Hcl Software
Monthly
Denial of service in HCL DFXAnalytics version 3.0 and below allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash or hang the application by supplying oversized input that overflows a fixed-size memory buffer. The flaw stems from missing input-length validation and carries an availability-only impact (CVSS 7.5, AV:N/PR:N); there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.24%), though CISA SSVC rates the weakness as automatable with partial technical impact.
Cleartext-adjacent data exposure in HCL DFXAnalytics (version 3.0 and below) stems from continued support for the deprecated TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 protocols, whose known cryptographic weaknesses let a suitably positioned attacker intercept and potentially decrypt session traffic. The flaw is an information-disclosure/confidentiality issue reported by HCL; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is very low (0.14%, 3rd percentile). SSVC scores exploitation as none and automatable as no, indicating a real but low-urgency hardening issue rather than an actively targeted vulnerability.
Account takeover in HCL DFXAnalytics version 3.0 and below allows a remote attacker to intercept and alter server HTTP responses to defeat client-side authentication or authorization checks and gain unauthorized access to targeted user accounts. HCL rated the flaw critical (CVSS 9.8), but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low at 0.16% (6th percentile), with CISA's SSVC framework marking exploitation as none and technical impact as only partial. The weakness class is authentication bypass (CWE-294), where trust in unverified/manipulable response data lets an attacker forge an authenticated state.
Internal IP address disclosure in HCL DFXAnalytics (version 3.0 and below) exposes internal network topology data embedded within the application's server responses, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to enumerate internal infrastructure for reconnaissance. The issue was reported by HCL and carries a vendor CVSS of 8.2, though it maps to a CWE-200 information exposure with no integrity or availability impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS risk is low (0.16%, 6th percentile), and CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none and non-automatable.
Session cookie exposure in HCL DFXAnalytics (version 3.0 and below) occurs because authentication-generated cookies are issued without the 'secure' attribute, permitting the browser to transmit them over unencrypted HTTP. A network-positioned attacker able to observe or coerce cleartext traffic can capture session tokens or credentials and impersonate the victim. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.17%, 7th percentile), and CISA SSVC records no known exploitation.
Authentication bypass in HCL DFXServer allows remote unauthenticated attackers to reach specific API endpoints directly and perform unauthorized actions without valid credentials, because the application never verifies authentication status on those routes. The primary impact is high confidentiality exposure with limited integrity impact (CVSS 8.2), and the flaw was self-reported by HCL. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authentication bypass in HCL DFXServer lets an unauthenticated remote attacker intercept and tamper with the server's authentication responses to be granted access as a legitimate user without presenting valid credentials. Rated CVSS 8.2 (high) with CWE-294 (Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay), the flaw exposes confidential application data to any network-reachable attacker. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
HCL MyXalytics is susceptible to a low-severity denial-of-service condition via unrestricted character input in user-facing fields. Authenticated users can submit arbitrarily long strings into application inputs, potentially degrading system performance or availability due to absent input-length controls. No public exploit code exists and no active exploitation has been observed; the vendor CVSS score of 3.5 (Low) reflects limited real-world impact.
Content spoofing in HCL MyXalytics (CWE-451) enables an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to inject manipulated content into the application's user interface, causing it to appear as though the content originates from a trusted source. The vulnerability requires victim interaction - a user must view the attacker-influenced page - and carries a CVSS 3.5 (Low) base score, reflecting its constrained impact on integrity only with no confidentiality or availability effects. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; the primary real-world concern is phishing and social engineering facilitated through the spoofed interface.
Improper input validation in HCL MyXalytics allows an authenticated low-privileged user to submit malicious or unexpected data through the application, causing unintended system behavior or minor integrity-affecting outcomes. The CVSS vector (PR:L/UI:R/I:L) indicates exploitation requires both an authenticated session and user interaction, with impact limited to low-level integrity modification and no confidentiality exposure. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
Session invalidation failure in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) v1.3 and v1.4 allows session tokens to persist as valid after an admin explicitly logs out or an administrator deletes the session. An attacker who has previously captured a valid session token - through network interception, XSS, or other means - can replay that token post-logout to retain unauthorized access to admin-level functionality. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS/KEV data are not available for this CVE.
Session tokens in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) versions 1.3 and 1.4 persist as valid on the server after a user logs out or an account is deleted, allowing an attacker who has previously captured a legitimate session token to replay it and maintain unauthorized access beyond the intended session lifecycle. The root cause is CWE-613 (Insufficient Session Expiration), where server-side session records are not destroyed upon logout or account removal. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 6.4 Medium score reflects meaningful constraints on exploitation including high attack complexity and required user interaction.
Missing HttpOnly cookie flags in HCL Hive expose session tokens and sensitive credentials to client-side script access, enabling session hijacking when combined with cross-site scripting. The CVE description cites broader infrastructure weaknesses - lateral movement, container breakout, and internal communications exposure - suggesting CWE-1004 is one root cause within a cluster of related configuration flaws. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and no KEV listing exists, but the network-accessible attack surface with no privilege requirement (beyond user interaction) makes this relevant for any internet-exposed Hive deployment.
HCL Hive's software supply chain governance weaknesses expose the application to risk from vulnerable, unmaintained, or malicious third-party dependencies incorporated into its build or runtime environment. The flaw (CWE-1104) reflects insufficient vetting of upstream components, meaning existing dependencies may carry unpatched CVEs or could serve as an introduction vector for malicious code. With a CVSS of 4.2 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R), exploitation is constrained by high attack complexity and user interaction requirements; no public exploit and no CISA KEV listing were identified at time of analysis.
HCL Hive exposes sensitive host environment information through a network-accessible information disclosure flaw, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers - under high attack complexity conditions - to collect reconnaissance data about the underlying system. The CVSS 3.7 (Low) score reflects both the constrained confidentiality impact and the high exploitation complexity. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
Missing or insecure Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) expose the application to unauthorized cross-origin browser interactions. The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N vector indicates that a highly privileged IEM user must be socially engineered into visiting a malicious page while authenticated, allowing an attacker's script to read IEM responses or issue limited requests on the victim's behalf. No active exploitation has been confirmed and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.
Privilege escalation in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows an authenticated, high-privileged attacker to access resources beyond their original authorization boundary, achieving confidentiality impact against protected data. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-272 (Least Privilege Violation) with a Changed scope in CVSS, indicating the attacker can reach resources outside their normal privilege domain within the application. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; the EPSS signal was not provided.
Race condition (CWE-362) in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) exposes a timing window that a remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit to modify shared resources, producing high integrity impact. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.9 reflects the offsetting effect of high attack complexity (AC:H), which limits opportunistic exploitation to adversaries capable of precise timing control. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is known at time of analysis.
Insufficient audit logging in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows an authenticated low-privilege network user to perform workflow actions that are not captured in security logs, breaking observability for incident response teams. All versions of IEM are affected per the wildcard CPE, and the CVSS Scope:Changed metric indicates the logging gap propagates impact to downstream audit platforms or SIEMs that depend on IEM event data. No public exploit code exists and CISA has not listed this in the KEV catalog; the primary risk is forensic and compliance-oriented rather than direct system compromise.
Insufficient audit logging in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows authenticated network users to probe privilege boundaries and conduct reconnaissance without generating detectable log entries. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) confirms any low-privileged authenticated user can exploit this over the network with no complexity barrier. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; this is a vendor-self-reported issue with no EPSS data or KEV listing.
Indirect prompt injection in HCL AION v2.5.0 enables authenticated network attackers to embed HTML markup into AI-generated rendered output, which may then be displayed to other platform users and trigger unintended browser behavior. Classified under CWE-1427 - a category specific to AI/LLM output sanitization failures - the vulnerability carries a vendor-assigned CVSS 4.3 Medium rating reflecting limited confidentiality impact and an authentication prerequisite. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
Insufficient server-side input validation in HCL AION v2.1.0 allows a low-privileged, adjacent-network attacker to submit crafted input that bypasses validation controls, resulting in limited confidentiality disclosure via a scope change to a dependent component. Exploitation requires user interaction, constraining opportunistic use. No public exploit code exists and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog at time of analysis.
JavaScript hijacking in HCL AION v2.1.0 exposes sensitive data from dynamic JavaScript responses to attacker-controlled pages under specific network and user interaction conditions. The vulnerability arises because JSON or JavaScript-formatted responses from AION can be referenced cross-origin by a malicious page, enabling data capture via classic JS hijacking techniques. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the low CVSS score of 3.7 reflects high attack complexity and constrained impact scope.
Insufficient anti-automation controls on certain HCL AION v2.1.0 endpoints allow scripted or automated requests to bypass rate limiting and challenge mechanisms from an adjacent network position. The CVSS vector (AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H) indicates exploitation requires adjacent network access, elevated attack complexity, low-privileged credentials, and user interaction - substantially limiting opportunistic exploitation. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, though the CWE-307 root cause represents a well-understood attack class with available tooling in other contexts.
HCL iControl v3.2.0 exposes sensitive data in transit by advertising support for deprecated TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 protocol versions, which lack modern cryptographic protections. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) indicates a network-reachable flaw requiring high attack complexity - consistent with a man-in-the-middle positioning requirement for exploitation. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing exist at time of analysis, placing this in the medium-priority tier despite its network exposure, though organizations with regulatory requirements around cryptographic standards (PCI-DSS, NIST SP 800-52) should treat remediation as mandatory.
Missing granular access control in HCL iControl v3.2.0 exposes administrator-level functionality to unauthorized users over the network. Regular-privilege users can bypass authorization checks to view or access admin-scoped features, resulting in a limited confidentiality impact. No public exploit code exists and no CISA KEV listing is present; however, the 'Authentication Bypass' tag and the network-accessible vector mean the exposure is reachable without physical proximity, though the high attack complexity (AC:H) constrains opportunistic exploitation.
Improper error handling in HCL iControl 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 exposes sensitive information through verbose error messages triggered by common fault conditions - out of memory events, null pointer exceptions, database unavailability, network timeouts, and system call failures. CWE-209 classifies this as generation of error messages containing sensitive information, meaning stack traces, internal paths, configuration data, or environment details may be disclosed to a network-accessible observer who can trigger or observe these fault states. CVSS scores this at 3.7 (Low), reflecting high attack complexity and limited confidentiality impact; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
HCL iControl versions 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 expose authentication-related sensitive data through browser autocomplete functionality on login forms, classified under CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials). Valid usernames, email addresses used for login, and account identifiers can be surfaced by the browser's autocomplete engine to subsequent users on shared workstations or kiosk environments. No active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS score of 3.7 accurately reflects a low-severity, opportunistic information disclosure issue rather than a remotely exploitable critical flaw.
HCL iControl versions 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 expose internal configuration files to local access due to improper web server or application hardening, classified under CWE-497 (Exposure of Sensitive System Information). Local actors without any privileges can read configuration data that should be restricted, potentially revealing sensitive system details usable for follow-on attacks. No public exploit or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS score of 4.0 (Medium) reflects the limited local attack surface.
Verbose API error responses in HCL iControl 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 leak internal endpoint names, request parameters, error codes, and authentication status directly to unauthenticated network clients. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) confirms network-accessible, unauthenticated exposure but with high attack complexity - specific error-triggering conditions must be crafted. No public exploit exists and this is not in CISA KEV; however, the disclosed metadata constitutes meaningful reconnaissance leverage that can lower the cost of subsequent targeted attacks against the platform.
HCL iControl versions 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 publicly expose internal configuration files due to inadequate web server or application hardening, mapping to CWE-15 (External Control of System or Configuration Setting). The misconfiguration allows attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration data that may contain credentials, internal paths, service endpoints, or other operational details usable for further lateral movement or privilege escalation. No active exploitation has been confirmed in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis.
HCL DFXAnalytics exposes internal file system paths and directory structure through unhandled error messages, system logs, or debugging output rendered by the application dashboard. All versions are affected per the wildcard CPE, and the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms unauthenticated remote attackers can trivially trigger and read this disclosure with no special configuration. No public exploit code exists and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; however, the leaked path information materially aids reconnaissance for chained attacks against the underlying server environment.
Missing HSTS header in HCL DFXAnalytics exposes authenticated sessions to protocol downgrade and man-in-the-middle attacks by network-positioned adversaries. All versions per the CPE wildcard are affected, and the application fails to include the Strict-Transport-Security response header, leaving browsers without enforcement of HTTPS-only communication. No active exploitation has been identified (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code is known, consistent with the low CVSS score of 3.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery exposure in HCL DFXAnalytics arises because session cookies generated during authentication are issued without the SameSite attribute, allowing browsers to attach them to cross-origin requests. An attacker who can lure an authenticated victim to a malicious page may issue forged state-changing requests that the server honors under the victim's identity, provided the application also lacks Anti-CSRF token validation - a condition the CVE description explicitly names as the decisive amplifying factor. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog; real-world risk is further constrained by modern browser defaults (Chrome 80+ and Firefox apply SameSite=Lax by default), high attack complexity, and the required user interaction.
Login replay vulnerability in HCL DFXAnalytics enables a remote attacker in a man-in-the-middle network position to capture and retransmit valid authentication messages, gaining unauthorized access as a legitimate user. The application lacks message-freshness enforcement - no timestamps or nonce mechanisms are applied to bound the validity window of authentication data, a design gap classified under CWE-294. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; the combination of high attack complexity and mandatory user interaction substantially limits realistic exploitation scope.
Unauthenticated API access in HCL DFXServer exposes application endpoints to any network-reachable user without identity verification. The missing access control allows interactions with protected functionality - including read and write operations - from a browser or client that holds no valid session or credentials. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing have been identified at time of analysis, though the CVSS 6.3 medium score and PR:N vector confirm that authentication is not required to reach the affected endpoints.
Reflected cross-site scripting in HCL Notes 12.0.2FP5HF8 enables unauthenticated network attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser sessions of targeted users who interact with malicious links. The CVSS 4.0 vector (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H) signals high downstream impact on victim sessions - including potential session hijacking, credential theft, and unauthorized action execution within the Notes web environment. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
Unrestricted file upload in HCL ZIE for Web (Z and I Emulator) version 16.0 allows remote attackers to upload a web shell that can yield arbitrary command execution on the server, but only when the server is configured to execute uploaded code and the file lands inside the Webroot. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.8, yet CISA's SSVC framework rates exploitation as 'none' and not automatable with only partial technical impact, and EPSS sits at just 0.34% (26th percentile). No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
HCL iControl's web interface fails to automatically expire user sessions after inactivity, leaving authenticated session tokens valid indefinitely until explicit logout. An attacker who obtains a valid session token - through interception or unattended browser access - can reuse it to access the application and read data. CVSS rates this Low (3.1) reflecting high attack complexity and limited confidentiality impact; no public exploit exists and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
HCL BigFix Service Management is vulnerable to improper root filesystem configuration, allowing high-privileged authenticated users with user interaction to make unauthorized modifications to critical system components. The vulnerability requires administrative privileges and user consent (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R), resulting in limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. No active exploitation has been publicly reported.
Credential exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 leaves credentials insufficiently protected for a brief window while the application communicates with an internal backend service, which an attacker who can capture that traffic could reuse to authenticate to the backend. The flaw was self-reported by HCL and carries a CVSS 7.5 (confidentiality-only) rating; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is negligible (0.03%, 8th percentile). CISA's SSVC framing rates exploitation as none and the issue as not automatable, indicating low immediate urgency.
HCL BigFix Service Management fails to sanitize spreadsheet data (CSV, XLS, XLSX) before export, allowing authenticated users to inject formulas or malicious content that executes when recipients open the files in spreadsheet applications. An attacker with legitimate service management access can craft payloads in data fields that, when exported and opened by targeted users, may exfiltrate information or trigger unintended actions-though modern Excel versions mitigate this with untrusted content warnings. CVSS 4.6 reflects moderate risk limited to authenticated users and required user interaction (opening the file).
HCL BigFix Service Management fails to strip EXIF metadata from uploaded images, allowing authenticated users to inadvertently expose sensitive location information and other metadata embedded in image files. The vulnerability requires user interaction (image upload and viewing) but poses a direct confidentiality risk to organizations handling location-sensitive imagery through the application.
HCL BigFix Service Management contains unauthenticated-accessible directories that are not linked in the user interface but can be reached through direct URL access, enabling authenticated users with low privileges to disclose sensitive information or access restricted functionality. The vulnerability requires authenticated access, user interaction, and higher-than-average attack complexity; active exploitation status has not been confirmed.
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows authenticated users with sufficient privileges to perform unauthorized actions or access sensitive data through malicious web requests. The vulnerability requires user interaction (such as clicking a malicious link) and affects confidentiality but not integrity or availability, resulting in a CVSS score of 2.6. No active exploitation has been publicly reported.
Denial of service in HCL DFXAnalytics version 3.0 and below allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash or hang the application by supplying oversized input that overflows a fixed-size memory buffer. The flaw stems from missing input-length validation and carries an availability-only impact (CVSS 7.5, AV:N/PR:N); there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.24%), though CISA SSVC rates the weakness as automatable with partial technical impact.
Cleartext-adjacent data exposure in HCL DFXAnalytics (version 3.0 and below) stems from continued support for the deprecated TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 protocols, whose known cryptographic weaknesses let a suitably positioned attacker intercept and potentially decrypt session traffic. The flaw is an information-disclosure/confidentiality issue reported by HCL; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is very low (0.14%, 3rd percentile). SSVC scores exploitation as none and automatable as no, indicating a real but low-urgency hardening issue rather than an actively targeted vulnerability.
Account takeover in HCL DFXAnalytics version 3.0 and below allows a remote attacker to intercept and alter server HTTP responses to defeat client-side authentication or authorization checks and gain unauthorized access to targeted user accounts. HCL rated the flaw critical (CVSS 9.8), but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low at 0.16% (6th percentile), with CISA's SSVC framework marking exploitation as none and technical impact as only partial. The weakness class is authentication bypass (CWE-294), where trust in unverified/manipulable response data lets an attacker forge an authenticated state.
Internal IP address disclosure in HCL DFXAnalytics (version 3.0 and below) exposes internal network topology data embedded within the application's server responses, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to enumerate internal infrastructure for reconnaissance. The issue was reported by HCL and carries a vendor CVSS of 8.2, though it maps to a CWE-200 information exposure with no integrity or availability impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS risk is low (0.16%, 6th percentile), and CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none and non-automatable.
Session cookie exposure in HCL DFXAnalytics (version 3.0 and below) occurs because authentication-generated cookies are issued without the 'secure' attribute, permitting the browser to transmit them over unencrypted HTTP. A network-positioned attacker able to observe or coerce cleartext traffic can capture session tokens or credentials and impersonate the victim. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.17%, 7th percentile), and CISA SSVC records no known exploitation.
Authentication bypass in HCL DFXServer allows remote unauthenticated attackers to reach specific API endpoints directly and perform unauthorized actions without valid credentials, because the application never verifies authentication status on those routes. The primary impact is high confidentiality exposure with limited integrity impact (CVSS 8.2), and the flaw was self-reported by HCL. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Authentication bypass in HCL DFXServer lets an unauthenticated remote attacker intercept and tamper with the server's authentication responses to be granted access as a legitimate user without presenting valid credentials. Rated CVSS 8.2 (high) with CWE-294 (Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay), the flaw exposes confidential application data to any network-reachable attacker. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
HCL MyXalytics is susceptible to a low-severity denial-of-service condition via unrestricted character input in user-facing fields. Authenticated users can submit arbitrarily long strings into application inputs, potentially degrading system performance or availability due to absent input-length controls. No public exploit code exists and no active exploitation has been observed; the vendor CVSS score of 3.5 (Low) reflects limited real-world impact.
Content spoofing in HCL MyXalytics (CWE-451) enables an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to inject manipulated content into the application's user interface, causing it to appear as though the content originates from a trusted source. The vulnerability requires victim interaction - a user must view the attacker-influenced page - and carries a CVSS 3.5 (Low) base score, reflecting its constrained impact on integrity only with no confidentiality or availability effects. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; the primary real-world concern is phishing and social engineering facilitated through the spoofed interface.
Improper input validation in HCL MyXalytics allows an authenticated low-privileged user to submit malicious or unexpected data through the application, causing unintended system behavior or minor integrity-affecting outcomes. The CVSS vector (PR:L/UI:R/I:L) indicates exploitation requires both an authenticated session and user interaction, with impact limited to low-level integrity modification and no confidentiality exposure. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
Session invalidation failure in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) v1.3 and v1.4 allows session tokens to persist as valid after an admin explicitly logs out or an administrator deletes the session. An attacker who has previously captured a valid session token - through network interception, XSS, or other means - can replay that token post-logout to retain unauthorized access to admin-level functionality. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS/KEV data are not available for this CVE.
Session tokens in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) versions 1.3 and 1.4 persist as valid on the server after a user logs out or an account is deleted, allowing an attacker who has previously captured a legitimate session token to replay it and maintain unauthorized access beyond the intended session lifecycle. The root cause is CWE-613 (Insufficient Session Expiration), where server-side session records are not destroyed upon logout or account removal. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 6.4 Medium score reflects meaningful constraints on exploitation including high attack complexity and required user interaction.
Missing HttpOnly cookie flags in HCL Hive expose session tokens and sensitive credentials to client-side script access, enabling session hijacking when combined with cross-site scripting. The CVE description cites broader infrastructure weaknesses - lateral movement, container breakout, and internal communications exposure - suggesting CWE-1004 is one root cause within a cluster of related configuration flaws. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and no KEV listing exists, but the network-accessible attack surface with no privilege requirement (beyond user interaction) makes this relevant for any internet-exposed Hive deployment.
HCL Hive's software supply chain governance weaknesses expose the application to risk from vulnerable, unmaintained, or malicious third-party dependencies incorporated into its build or runtime environment. The flaw (CWE-1104) reflects insufficient vetting of upstream components, meaning existing dependencies may carry unpatched CVEs or could serve as an introduction vector for malicious code. With a CVSS of 4.2 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R), exploitation is constrained by high attack complexity and user interaction requirements; no public exploit and no CISA KEV listing were identified at time of analysis.
HCL Hive exposes sensitive host environment information through a network-accessible information disclosure flaw, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers - under high attack complexity conditions - to collect reconnaissance data about the underlying system. The CVSS 3.7 (Low) score reflects both the constrained confidentiality impact and the high exploitation complexity. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
Missing or insecure Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) expose the application to unauthorized cross-origin browser interactions. The CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N vector indicates that a highly privileged IEM user must be socially engineered into visiting a malicious page while authenticated, allowing an attacker's script to read IEM responses or issue limited requests on the victim's behalf. No active exploitation has been confirmed and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.
Privilege escalation in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows an authenticated, high-privileged attacker to access resources beyond their original authorization boundary, achieving confidentiality impact against protected data. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-272 (Least Privilege Violation) with a Changed scope in CVSS, indicating the attacker can reach resources outside their normal privilege domain within the application. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; the EPSS signal was not provided.
Race condition (CWE-362) in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) exposes a timing window that a remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit to modify shared resources, producing high integrity impact. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.9 reflects the offsetting effect of high attack complexity (AC:H), which limits opportunistic exploitation to adversaries capable of precise timing control. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is known at time of analysis.
Insufficient audit logging in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows an authenticated low-privilege network user to perform workflow actions that are not captured in security logs, breaking observability for incident response teams. All versions of IEM are affected per the wildcard CPE, and the CVSS Scope:Changed metric indicates the logging gap propagates impact to downstream audit platforms or SIEMs that depend on IEM event data. No public exploit code exists and CISA has not listed this in the KEV catalog; the primary risk is forensic and compliance-oriented rather than direct system compromise.
Insufficient audit logging in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows authenticated network users to probe privilege boundaries and conduct reconnaissance without generating detectable log entries. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) confirms any low-privileged authenticated user can exploit this over the network with no complexity barrier. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; this is a vendor-self-reported issue with no EPSS data or KEV listing.
Indirect prompt injection in HCL AION v2.5.0 enables authenticated network attackers to embed HTML markup into AI-generated rendered output, which may then be displayed to other platform users and trigger unintended browser behavior. Classified under CWE-1427 - a category specific to AI/LLM output sanitization failures - the vulnerability carries a vendor-assigned CVSS 4.3 Medium rating reflecting limited confidentiality impact and an authentication prerequisite. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
Insufficient server-side input validation in HCL AION v2.1.0 allows a low-privileged, adjacent-network attacker to submit crafted input that bypasses validation controls, resulting in limited confidentiality disclosure via a scope change to a dependent component. Exploitation requires user interaction, constraining opportunistic use. No public exploit code exists and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog at time of analysis.
JavaScript hijacking in HCL AION v2.1.0 exposes sensitive data from dynamic JavaScript responses to attacker-controlled pages under specific network and user interaction conditions. The vulnerability arises because JSON or JavaScript-formatted responses from AION can be referenced cross-origin by a malicious page, enabling data capture via classic JS hijacking techniques. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the low CVSS score of 3.7 reflects high attack complexity and constrained impact scope.
Insufficient anti-automation controls on certain HCL AION v2.1.0 endpoints allow scripted or automated requests to bypass rate limiting and challenge mechanisms from an adjacent network position. The CVSS vector (AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H) indicates exploitation requires adjacent network access, elevated attack complexity, low-privileged credentials, and user interaction - substantially limiting opportunistic exploitation. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, though the CWE-307 root cause represents a well-understood attack class with available tooling in other contexts.
HCL iControl v3.2.0 exposes sensitive data in transit by advertising support for deprecated TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 protocol versions, which lack modern cryptographic protections. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) indicates a network-reachable flaw requiring high attack complexity - consistent with a man-in-the-middle positioning requirement for exploitation. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing exist at time of analysis, placing this in the medium-priority tier despite its network exposure, though organizations with regulatory requirements around cryptographic standards (PCI-DSS, NIST SP 800-52) should treat remediation as mandatory.
Missing granular access control in HCL iControl v3.2.0 exposes administrator-level functionality to unauthorized users over the network. Regular-privilege users can bypass authorization checks to view or access admin-scoped features, resulting in a limited confidentiality impact. No public exploit code exists and no CISA KEV listing is present; however, the 'Authentication Bypass' tag and the network-accessible vector mean the exposure is reachable without physical proximity, though the high attack complexity (AC:H) constrains opportunistic exploitation.
Improper error handling in HCL iControl 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 exposes sensitive information through verbose error messages triggered by common fault conditions - out of memory events, null pointer exceptions, database unavailability, network timeouts, and system call failures. CWE-209 classifies this as generation of error messages containing sensitive information, meaning stack traces, internal paths, configuration data, or environment details may be disclosed to a network-accessible observer who can trigger or observe these fault states. CVSS scores this at 3.7 (Low), reflecting high attack complexity and limited confidentiality impact; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
HCL iControl versions 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 expose authentication-related sensitive data through browser autocomplete functionality on login forms, classified under CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials). Valid usernames, email addresses used for login, and account identifiers can be surfaced by the browser's autocomplete engine to subsequent users on shared workstations or kiosk environments. No active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS score of 3.7 accurately reflects a low-severity, opportunistic information disclosure issue rather than a remotely exploitable critical flaw.
HCL iControl versions 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 expose internal configuration files to local access due to improper web server or application hardening, classified under CWE-497 (Exposure of Sensitive System Information). Local actors without any privileges can read configuration data that should be restricted, potentially revealing sensitive system details usable for follow-on attacks. No public exploit or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS score of 4.0 (Medium) reflects the limited local attack surface.
Verbose API error responses in HCL iControl 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 leak internal endpoint names, request parameters, error codes, and authentication status directly to unauthenticated network clients. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) confirms network-accessible, unauthenticated exposure but with high attack complexity - specific error-triggering conditions must be crafted. No public exploit exists and this is not in CISA KEV; however, the disclosed metadata constitutes meaningful reconnaissance leverage that can lower the cost of subsequent targeted attacks against the platform.
HCL iControl versions 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 publicly expose internal configuration files due to inadequate web server or application hardening, mapping to CWE-15 (External Control of System or Configuration Setting). The misconfiguration allows attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration data that may contain credentials, internal paths, service endpoints, or other operational details usable for further lateral movement or privilege escalation. No active exploitation has been confirmed in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis.
HCL DFXAnalytics exposes internal file system paths and directory structure through unhandled error messages, system logs, or debugging output rendered by the application dashboard. All versions are affected per the wildcard CPE, and the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms unauthenticated remote attackers can trivially trigger and read this disclosure with no special configuration. No public exploit code exists and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; however, the leaked path information materially aids reconnaissance for chained attacks against the underlying server environment.
Missing HSTS header in HCL DFXAnalytics exposes authenticated sessions to protocol downgrade and man-in-the-middle attacks by network-positioned adversaries. All versions per the CPE wildcard are affected, and the application fails to include the Strict-Transport-Security response header, leaving browsers without enforcement of HTTPS-only communication. No active exploitation has been identified (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code is known, consistent with the low CVSS score of 3.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery exposure in HCL DFXAnalytics arises because session cookies generated during authentication are issued without the SameSite attribute, allowing browsers to attach them to cross-origin requests. An attacker who can lure an authenticated victim to a malicious page may issue forged state-changing requests that the server honors under the victim's identity, provided the application also lacks Anti-CSRF token validation - a condition the CVE description explicitly names as the decisive amplifying factor. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog; real-world risk is further constrained by modern browser defaults (Chrome 80+ and Firefox apply SameSite=Lax by default), high attack complexity, and the required user interaction.
Login replay vulnerability in HCL DFXAnalytics enables a remote attacker in a man-in-the-middle network position to capture and retransmit valid authentication messages, gaining unauthorized access as a legitimate user. The application lacks message-freshness enforcement - no timestamps or nonce mechanisms are applied to bound the validity window of authentication data, a design gap classified under CWE-294. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV; the combination of high attack complexity and mandatory user interaction substantially limits realistic exploitation scope.
Unauthenticated API access in HCL DFXServer exposes application endpoints to any network-reachable user without identity verification. The missing access control allows interactions with protected functionality - including read and write operations - from a browser or client that holds no valid session or credentials. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing have been identified at time of analysis, though the CVSS 6.3 medium score and PR:N vector confirm that authentication is not required to reach the affected endpoints.
Reflected cross-site scripting in HCL Notes 12.0.2FP5HF8 enables unauthenticated network attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser sessions of targeted users who interact with malicious links. The CVSS 4.0 vector (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H) signals high downstream impact on victim sessions - including potential session hijacking, credential theft, and unauthorized action execution within the Notes web environment. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
Unrestricted file upload in HCL ZIE for Web (Z and I Emulator) version 16.0 allows remote attackers to upload a web shell that can yield arbitrary command execution on the server, but only when the server is configured to execute uploaded code and the file lands inside the Webroot. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.8, yet CISA's SSVC framework rates exploitation as 'none' and not automatable with only partial technical impact, and EPSS sits at just 0.34% (26th percentile). No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.
HCL iControl's web interface fails to automatically expire user sessions after inactivity, leaving authenticated session tokens valid indefinitely until explicit logout. An attacker who obtains a valid session token - through interception or unattended browser access - can reuse it to access the application and read data. CVSS rates this Low (3.1) reflecting high attack complexity and limited confidentiality impact; no public exploit exists and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV.
HCL BigFix Service Management is vulnerable to improper root filesystem configuration, allowing high-privileged authenticated users with user interaction to make unauthorized modifications to critical system components. The vulnerability requires administrative privileges and user consent (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R), resulting in limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. No active exploitation has been publicly reported.
Credential exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 leaves credentials insufficiently protected for a brief window while the application communicates with an internal backend service, which an attacker who can capture that traffic could reuse to authenticate to the backend. The flaw was self-reported by HCL and carries a CVSS 7.5 (confidentiality-only) rating; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is negligible (0.03%, 8th percentile). CISA's SSVC framing rates exploitation as none and the issue as not automatable, indicating low immediate urgency.
HCL BigFix Service Management fails to sanitize spreadsheet data (CSV, XLS, XLSX) before export, allowing authenticated users to inject formulas or malicious content that executes when recipients open the files in spreadsheet applications. An attacker with legitimate service management access can craft payloads in data fields that, when exported and opened by targeted users, may exfiltrate information or trigger unintended actions-though modern Excel versions mitigate this with untrusted content warnings. CVSS 4.6 reflects moderate risk limited to authenticated users and required user interaction (opening the file).
HCL BigFix Service Management fails to strip EXIF metadata from uploaded images, allowing authenticated users to inadvertently expose sensitive location information and other metadata embedded in image files. The vulnerability requires user interaction (image upload and viewing) but poses a direct confidentiality risk to organizations handling location-sensitive imagery through the application.
HCL BigFix Service Management contains unauthenticated-accessible directories that are not linked in the user interface but can be reached through direct URL access, enabling authenticated users with low privileges to disclose sensitive information or access restricted functionality. The vulnerability requires authenticated access, user interaction, and higher-than-average attack complexity; active exploitation status has not been confirmed.
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows authenticated users with sufficient privileges to perform unauthorized actions or access sensitive data through malicious web requests. The vulnerability requires user interaction (such as clicking a malicious link) and affects confidentiality but not integrity or availability, resulting in a CVSS score of 2.6. No active exploitation has been publicly reported.