Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malformed input payload
-
DeliveryInduce victim user interaction
-
ExploitSubmit unvalidated data to app
-
ExecutionInjection in downstream processing
-
ImpactLimited integrity impact
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R) - a legitimate user of HCL BigFix Service Management must submit or trigger the attacker-supplied malformed input, so this cannot be driven to completion by the attacker alone. The description does not name a specific feature, protocol, or configuration setting that must be enabled; the condition is that attacker-controlled input reaches an input-processing or downstream integration path that lacks adequate validation. Limiting factors: the impact is confined to integrity (I:L) with no confidentiality or availability effect, and the mandatory user-interaction requirement meaningfully reduces realistic exploitability versus a fully autonomous remote flaw. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-to-low real-world priority despite the CVSS:3.1 vector showing a network attack vector (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no privileges required (PR:N). Three factors substantially temper the raw signal: the base score is only 4.3 (Medium), the impact is limited to integrity with no confidentiality or availability effect (C:N/I:L/A:N), and successful exploitation requires user interaction (UI:R), meaning an attacker cannot act fully autonomously. No EPSS probability, CISA KEV listing, SSVC decision data, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or commoditized attack tooling - the signals that would elevate this above routine patching are absent rather than present. The description characterizes the flaw as improper input validation that 'could' enable injection or downstream processing errors, which is conditional and non-specific; combined with the low integrity-only impact, this reads as a limited input-handling weakness rather than a full code-execution issue. The 'Code Injection' tag should be treated cautiously - an I:L/C:N/A:N vector is inconsistent with true arbitrary code injection, which would normally carry higher impact; verify the actual sink and effect with HCL's advisory before prioritizing as code injection. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malformed input (e.g., a specially formed request or field value) and lures an authenticated or anonymous user of HCL BigFix Service Management to trigger it, since user interaction is required. The unvalidated data is processed by the application or passed to a downstream system, causing an injection condition or data-integrity error with limited impact and no confidentiality or availability loss. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026
Input validation failures in HCL BigFix Service Management allow remote attackers to inject malformed data into the application, potentially causing injection attacks or errors in downstream processing systems. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) indicates network-accessible, low-complexity, unauthenticated access, but exploitation requires user interaction, so an attacker cannot complete the attack alone. Impact is limited to low integrity with no confidentiality or availability effect, making this a moderate-to-low real-world priority; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply the fix from HCL. The provided reference points to the HCL advisory KB0134015 at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015; no exact patched version is specified in the input data, so obtain the fixed build or upgrade path directly from that advisory. Until patched, restrict network access to HCL BigFix Service Management to trusted users or networks; trade-off: this may block legitimate remote or distributed users. If HCL identifies affected input-processing or integration features, limit or disable unnecessary ones; trade-off: can break business workflows. Add server-side validation and sanitization at integration boundaries and monitor for malformed data; trade-off: requires development and operational effort and may produce false positives. Because exploitation requires user interaction, reinforce user awareness against submitting untrusted content; trade-off: this is non-technical and not a complete control. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, so prioritize patching according to HCL guidance and asset criticality.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is an improper input validation issue, tagged as Code Injection, in HCL BigFix Service Management. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hcl_bigfix_service_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* with no version range specified, meaning the provided data does not narrow affected versions. The root cause class is inadequate validation or sanitization of attacker-controlled input before it is processed by the application or passed to downstream integration or processing systems. The CVSS vector shows attack vector network, low complexity, no privileges required (PR:N), but user interaction required (UI:R); the only impact is low integrity, with no confidentiality or availability effect. The description does not name a specific feature, protocol, or configuration setting that must be enabled; the condition is that malicious input reaches an input-processing path lacking validation, and a legitimate user must submit or trigger that input. CWE was not provided, so the Code Injection tag is the primary classification available.
Know when Hcl Bigfix Service Management gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Remote (AV:N) and no auth (PR:N) per description of unvalidated remote input, but UI:R since injection requires a user to submit the crafted data; integrity-only (I:L).
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject unvalidated, malformed data into the application, enabling potential injection attacks or errors in downstream processing systems.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Interception of unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an on-path attac
Stored cross-site scripting in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker persist malicious script inside the applic
Sustained brute-force attacks against the HCL BigFix Service Management v27 login interface are possible because the pro
Unrestricted file upload in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker submit a crafted file through the product's u
Server-side request forgery in the search functionality of HCL BigFix Service Management allows remote attackers to make
An exposed API endpoint in HCL BigFix Service Management returns sensitive internal database information to remote, unau
Information disclosure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive da
Inspection of publicly served JavaScript in BigFix Service Management lets unauthenticated remote users discover hidden
HCL BigFix Service Management exposes internal IP addresses through its own HTTP responses - response headers, error mes
Cross-tenant data exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows an authenticated user with a valid account in one ten
HCL BigFix Service Management ships with a CORS misconfiguration (CWE-942) in which Origin headers are improperly valida
Administrative session hijacking in HCL BigFix Service Management Version 27 stems from the product allowing multiple si
EUVD-2025-211022
GHSA-gqfx-r7qp-x9jj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB