Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain on-path/MitM network position
-
DeliveryPresent cert with known-compromised trusted key
-
ExploitBigFix validates server against stale bundle
-
ExecutionImpersonate server and tamper downloaded files
-
ImpactDeliver malicious/altered content to host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a BigFix Platform installation still using a Mozilla CA certificate bundle dated before 2026/10/20 (fixed bundle ships with BES Support v1520+). The attacker must (1) occupy an on-path / man-in-the-middle position on the network between BigFix and the remote servers it validates, and (2) possess or use a server certificate whose private key is among the known-compromised keys that the outdated bundle still trusts. Exploitation only occurs when the application validates a server and downloads files (the UI:R/user-or-app-triggered condition). Limiting factors: the stale-bundle precondition, the required privileged on-path position, and the dependency on a specific compromised-key certificate all substantially raise the bar (reflected in AC:H); it is not exploitable against installations already on the 2026/10/20+ bundle. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity transport-security flaw, not an urgent priority. The vendor CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 6.8) is internally coherent with the description: AV:N reflects a network-based on-path attacker, PR:N means no credentials are needed, but AC:H and UI:R correctly capture that the attacker must already occupy a privileged on-path position AND possess a certificate whose private key is among the known-compromised set still trusted by the stale bundle, while the victim application must perform a server validation/download. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC reference are present in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or available exploit code. The vuln.today Decision label is 'this_month' (not act_now/emergency), which aligns with the high-complexity, no-active-exploitation picture: patch on a normal cycle rather than treat as a fire. Signals are consistent - no conflict between CVSS, decision label, and exploitation signals - so this reads as a genuine but conditional, non-widespread risk rather than a high-CVSS-but-overstated issue or a low-CVSS-but-dangerous one. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds a man-in-the-middle position on the network path between a BigFix Platform component and a remote server presents a TLS certificate signed with a known-compromised private key that the outdated (pre-2026/10/20) Mozilla CA bundle still trusts. BigFix accepts the impersonated server as legitimate and the attacker substitutes or tampers with files the application downloads. No public exploit code or PoC reference is provided in the input, so no public exploit is identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 24, 2026
BigFix Platform installations that still ship a Mozilla CA certificate bundle (PEM) dated before 2026/10/20 continue to trust certificates whose private keys are known to be compromised, so an attacker holding an on-path position can impersonate the remote servers BigFix validates and tamper with the files the application downloads. Successful exploitation requires that stale bundle to be present, a privileged man-in-the-middle position, and a certificate chained to one of the compromised keys, which is why the assessed severity is moderate rather than urgent (CVSS 3.1 base 6.8, AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R). No public exploit code or PoC reference was identified at time of analysis, and the flaw does not affect installations already running the 2026/10/20 or later bundle shipped with BES Support v1520 and above.
RemediationAI
Deploy the updated Mozilla CA certificate bundle dated 2026/10/20 or later, which HCL distributes starting with BES Support v1520; upgrading content to BES Support v1520+ is the resolution the vendor states for this issue (KB0134758, https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134758). Operators should verify the effective bundle date after the content update rather than assuming it, since the vulnerable condition is the date of the bundle actually in use. The provided sources do not describe a workaround, and the vendor's stated position is that the stale bundle must be replaced; until the update is applied, the exposure is limited to validations performed under a certificate whose private key is among the compromised set, and remediation should be scheduled on the this_month cadence indicated by the priority data rather than treated as an emergency.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
BigFix Platform performs TLS server validation against a bundled Mozilla CA certificate store distributed as a PEM file rather than relying solely on the operating system trust store. That design means the trust anchors age with the product's content release cycle: when a CA or leaf certificate is publicly disclosed as having a compromised private key, it must be removed from the bundle, and any installation whose bundle predates that removal still accepts chains built on the revoked material. The provided data assigns no CWE; the root-cause class is use of stale trust anchors in the validation path, i.e. the client-side trust decision is made against an outdated list rather than a current one. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) confirms the attack is network-reachable and needs no credentials, but the High attack complexity reflects the combination of preconditions: the outdated bundle must be in use, the attacker must sit on-path between BigFix and the validated servers, and a certificate matching a compromised key must be available. The UI:R component corresponds to validation and file download being triggered by user or application action, and the scope is unchanged with high confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact, matching server impersonation plus download tampering rather than service disruption.
Know when Bigfix Platform gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
On-path position plus a specific compromised-key certificate give AC:H; no credentials needed (PR:N); the app must perform a validated download (UI:R); confidentiality and integrity of downloaded content are impacted, availability is not.
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
BigFix Platform uses Mozilla CA certificate bundle (PEM). Versions of the bundle dated before 2026/10/20 still trust certificates whose private keys have been compromised. When BigFix Platform validates servers using such a bundle, an on-path attacker can impersonate remote servers and tamper with files downloaded by the application. The issue is resolved by using bundle version 2026/10/20 or later. The fixed bundle is available starting from BES Support v1520.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Bigfix Platform
View allIBM BigFix Platform 9.5 could allow any authenticated user to upload any file to any location on the server with root pr
IBM BigFix Platform could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a use-after-free ra
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix 9.2 and 9.5) does not require that users should have strong passwords by default
IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute f
IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 could allow an attacker to query the relay remotely and gather information about the upd
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicio
Local privilege escalation in HCL BigFix Platform on Windows allows authenticated users with low privileges to access cr
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on Session Token vulnerability that could potentially lead to Remote Code Execution (R
An integer overflow in xerces-c++ 3.2.3 in BigFix Platform allows remote attackers to cause out-of-bound access via HTTP
IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute mal
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager could allow a user under special circumstances to inject commands that would be executed wit
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), thi
EUVD-2026-109219
GHSA-x7j6-r59g-9w4v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB