Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIntercept or steal admin session token
-
DeliveryAdmin logs out of HCL IEM console
-
ExploitSession token persists server-side
-
ExecutionAttacker replays stolen token in HTTP request
-
ImpactUnauthorized admin access retained
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that an attacker first obtain a valid HCL IEM admin session token through a separate technique (e.g., network interception on an unencrypted or improperly secured channel, browser-based XSS, or physical access to a logged-in workstation). The victim administrator must have an active session that the attacker has already captured; the attacker cannot create this session themselves. The vulnerability is specifically triggered by the post-logout persistence of that token - the admin must have logged out (or had their session deleted) for the session-fixation aspect to be relevant. The CVSS UI:R metric confirms that user interaction (the admin's login creating the session) is a prerequisite. Limiting factors include: High Attack Complexity (AC:H) reflecting the token-theft prerequisite, Required User Interaction (UI:R), and scope limited to the HCL IEM admin interface only. The vulnerability does not allow unauthenticated initial access; it extends an already-stolen session beyond its intended validity. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 score of 3.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) is consistent with the actual exploitation complexity: an attacker must first obtain a valid session token - a non-trivial prerequisite - and then exploit the window between the victim's logout and server-side token expiration (if it ever expires). The High Attack Complexity and Required User Interaction correctly suppress the score. Confidentiality impact is Limited (C:L), with no integrity or availability impact noted. No EPSS score is available and this CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, meaning no confirmed active exploitation exists at time of analysis. Real-world risk is further constrained by HCL IEM's relatively narrow enterprise deployment footprint. The vulnerability is a real but low-urgency issue: it requires chaining with a prior token-theft technique to be exploitable, and its impact is confined to unauthorized persistence in an existing admin session rather than initial compromise. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker monitoring a network segment (or exploiting a prior XSS vulnerability in the IEM interface) captures an active session cookie belonging to an administrator. The administrator then logs out of the IEM console. Because the server-side session is not invalidated, the attacker replays the captured cookie in subsequent HTTP requests and continues to access administrative functions as if still authenticated. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 27, 2026
Session invalidation failure in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) v1.3 and v1.4 allows session tokens to persist as valid after an admin explicitly logs out or an administrator deletes the session. An attacker who has previously captured a valid session token - through network interception, XSS, or other means - can replay that token post-logout to retain unauthorized access to admin-level functionality. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS/KEV data are not available for this CVE.
RemediationAI
Consult the HCL vendor advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0131777 (KB0131777) for official patch or upgrade guidance; a specific fixed version is not independently confirmed from the available data beyond what the vendor discloses there. As a compensating control, administrators should enforce short absolute session timeouts at the application or reverse-proxy layer to limit the window during which a stale token remains usable - note this may affect legitimate long-running administrative workflows. Additionally, restricting access to the HCL IEM admin interface to trusted network segments or VPN reduces exposure to token interception. Audit session token revocation logic in any custom integrations with the IEM API, as those may also be affected by the incomplete logout path.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is an IT operations event management platform by HCL Software, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hcl_iem:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The root cause is classified under CWE-557 (Concurrency Issues with Locks), framed by the vendor as an 'Admin Session Concurrency Vulnerability,' suggesting the session lifecycle management does not atomically invalidate all server-side session references upon logout - likely a race condition or incomplete session teardown path when concurrent admin sessions exist. In practice, the behavioral outcome resembles CWE-613 (Insufficient Session Expiration): the session token issued at login is not authoritatively revoked server-side, so replaying it after logout continues to yield authenticated access. Affected versions are v1.3 and v1.4 per EUVD-2025-210806.
Know when Hcl Iem gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
AC:H reflects mandatory prior token theft; UI:R because victim admin session must exist; C:L for limited session data exposure only.
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is affected by an Admin Session Concurrency Vulnerability. it may allows user sessions to remain active after logout or session deletion.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2025-210806
GHSA-vf69-7295-r5qp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB