Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver malicious link to authenticated Hive user
-
DeliveryVictim clicks and loads attacker content in browser
-
ExploitJavaScript reads unprotected session cookie (CWE-1004)
-
ExecutionExfiltrate cookie to attacker server
-
PersistAuthenticate to Hive as victim
-
ImpactPivot to internal services or exploit container misconfiguration
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A02:2025 - Security Misconfiguration
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security HttpOnly cookie flag
|
| Exploitation Conditions | User interaction is required - a victim must visit or interact with attacker-controlled content while authenticated to HCL Hive, satisfying the UI:R metric. No privileges are required on the attacker side (PR:N), but the attacker must be able to deliver malicious JavaScript into the victim's browser context, typically via XSS, phishing, or a malicious link. The cookie exposure (CWE-1004) is a server-side misconfiguration present in default or common Hive deployments; no special non-default configuration is required for the cookie flag to be missing. The broader lateral movement and container breakout conditions are not fully specified in available data - it is unknown whether those require additional misconfigurations, elevated permissions inside the platform, or specific deployment topologies. Exploitation is limited by the requirement for user interaction and by the need for an XSS delivery vector or equivalent JavaScript execution opportunity. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 5.4 Medium, with C:L and I:L, understates the potential blast radius described - lateral movement and container breakout are not Low-impact outcomes. This discrepancy suggests either the CVSS was scoped narrowly to the cookie flag issue alone, or the broader infrastructure weaknesses were assessed separately. EPSS data is absent from the provided intelligence, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. The UI:R requirement reduces opportunistic exploitation risk, but a targeted phishing campaign or watering-hole scenario could realistically satisfy it. The PR:N metric confirms no authentication is needed on the attacker side, widening the potential attacker pool. Any organization running HCL Hive in an environment where users access it via browser - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in rybnik would find this relevant - should treat the lateral movement and container breakout claims seriously pending vendor clarification on scope, as those outcomes are disproportionate to a 5.4 score. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a phishing email or malicious link targeting a Hive user, embedding content that triggers execution of JavaScript in the Hive application context. Because session cookies lack the HttpOnly flag, the injected script reads the victim's authentication token via document.cookie and exfiltrates it to an attacker-controlled server. The attacker then uses the stolen session to authenticate as the victim within Hive, potentially pivoting to internal services or exploiting the described container misconfiguration for deeper network access. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 25, 2026
Missing HttpOnly cookie flags in HCL Hive expose session tokens and sensitive credentials to client-side script access, enabling session hijacking when combined with cross-site scripting. The CVE description cites broader infrastructure weaknesses - lateral movement, container breakout, and internal communications exposure - suggesting CWE-1004 is one root cause within a cluster of related configuration flaws. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and no KEV listing exists, but the network-accessible attack surface with no privilege requirement (beyond user interaction) makes this relevant for any internet-exposed Hive deployment.
RemediationAI
Consult the HCL vendor advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0133342 for patched version information, as no exact fix version is provided in available intelligence. Patch available per vendor advisory should be applied as the primary remediation. As a compensating control pending patch deployment, configure web application firewall rules to block reflected and stored XSS vectors targeting the Hive application, which is the most likely delivery mechanism for cookie theft via CWE-1004. Additionally, implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header restricting script sources to reduce XSS exploit surface; note this may require testing to avoid breaking legitimate Hive UI functionality. For the container breakout and lateral movement concerns cited in the description, enforce network segmentation between Hive containers and internal infrastructure, and audit container runtime permissions for unnecessary privilege escalations - these mitigations are independent of the patch and address the broader infrastructure weaknesses described.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-1004 (Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag) describes a class of misconfiguration where session or authentication cookies are set without the HttpOnly attribute, making them readable by JavaScript. In browser environments, this allows any injected or malicious client-side script to exfiltrate the cookie via document.cookie. HCL Hive, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hive:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, is an enterprise collaboration and workflow platform from HCL Software. The wildcard version in the CPE string indicates HCL has not scoped the affected range to specific releases, suggesting broad version impact. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) is consistent with a browser-based cookie theft scenario requiring a victim to interact with attacker-controlled content. The broader description of container breakout and lateral movement suggests the cookie exposure may act as an initial foothold enabling deeper infrastructure compromise.
Know when Hive gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
UI:R confirmed by browser-based cookie theft model; C:L and I:L reflect session token exposure without direct system-level impact from the cookie flag flaw alone.
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL Hive is affected by multiple infrastructure and network configuration vulnerabilities, which could lead to unauthorized lateral movement, container breakout, and sensitive data exposure within internal communications.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Signing cookies is an application security feature that adds a digital signature to cookie data to verify its authentici
Path traversal in adenhq Hive versions up to 0.11.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files via
This vulnerability in Apache Hive JDBC driver 0.7.1 to 2.3.2 allows carefully crafted arguments to be used to bypass the
The authorization framework in Apache Hive 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, on clusters protected by Ranger
Content Security Policy weakness in HCL Hive Telco Observability's Keycloak authentication component allows remote attac
In Apache Hive 2.3.3, 3.1.0 and earlier, local resources on HiveServer2 machines are not properly protected against mali
Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). R
The LDAP implementation in HiveServer2 in Apache Hive before 1.0.1 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1, as used in IBM InfoSphere Big
netius prior to 1.17.58 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulnerability is
SQL injection vulnerability in Hive Metastore Server (HMS) when processing delete column statistics requests via the Thr
Apache Hive 2.1.x before 2.1.2, 2.2.x before 2.2.1, and 2.3.x before 2.3.1 expose an interface through which masking pol
In Apache Hive 2.3.3, 3.1.0 and earlier, Hive "EXPLAIN" operation does not check for necessary authorization of involved
EUVD-2026-65469
GHSA-5h4h-m82c-fgmf
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB