Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconAttacker crafts malicious webpage with hidden form
-
DeliveryAttacker sends phishing email to BigFix SM user
-
ExploitUser clicks link while authenticated
-
InstallHidden form submits unauthorized request
-
C2BigFix SM accepts request using valid session
-
ExecuteUnauthorized action executes
-
ImpactSensitive data exposed or system state changed
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target user is currently authenticated to HCL BigFix Service Management with active session credentials. The attacker must use social engineering to convince the authenticated user to visit an attacker-controlled webpage or click a malicious link while logged into BigFix SM. The vulnerability only affects users with login privileges (PR:L in CVSS); unauthenticated users cannot be exploited. CSRF protections such as synchronization tokens or SameSite cookie attributes must be absent or misconfigured in the target deployment. The attack does not work if the user's browser enforces strict same-origin policies or if the user is accessing BigFix SM from a different domain than the attacker's website. |
| Impact | Despite the low CVSS score of 2.6, this vulnerability warrants attention in environments where BigFix SM is deployed for critical IT operations. The attack vector is network-based with high complexity (AC:H due to UI requirement and user action needed), and exploitation requires an authenticated attacker (PR:L). The CVSS vector shows limited confidentiality impact (C:L) with no integrity or availability impact. However, the requirement for user interaction significantly reduces real-world exploitation probability-an attacker must socially engineer an authenticated user to click a malicious link. The absence of EPSS data, POC availability, or CISA KEV listing suggests this is not actively exploited in the wild. Organizations should assess whether BigFix SM handles sensitive data; if it does, CSRF exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure or unauthorized administrative changes. The practical risk is moderate for environments with high user-facing functionality, but negligible for backend-only deployments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious webpage containing a hidden form that targets a sensitive BigFix SM endpoint (such as a configuration change or data export function). The attacker then tricks an authenticated BigFix SM administrator into visiting this webpage via a phishing email with a seemingly legitimate link. When the page loads, the hidden form automatically submits a request to BigFix SM using the administrator's authenticated session, performing an unauthorized action such as modifying IT policies or exporting sensitive configuration data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 06, 2026
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows authenticated users with sufficient privileges to perform unauthorized actions or access sensitive data through malicious web requests. The vulnerability requires user interaction (such as clicking a malicious link) and affects confidentiality but not integrity or availability, resulting in a CVSS score of 2.6. No active exploitation has been publicly reported.
RemediationAI
Apply the security patch released by HCL, available at the vendor advisory URL: https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0128144. Consult this advisory for the specific patched version applicable to your installation. Until patches can be deployed, implement compensating controls: enable SameSite cookie attributes (set to 'Strict' or 'Lax') on all BigFix SM session cookies to prevent CSRF attacks across cross-site scenarios; implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict form submissions to same-origin requests; educate users on avoiding suspicious links in emails or messages that claim to be from IT administration; and consider restricting access to BigFix SM administrative functions to internal networks only using firewall or VPN rules. Note that these controls do not fully eliminate the vulnerability and are temporary measures pending patch deployment.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CSRF vulnerabilities (CWE-352) occur when web applications accept state-changing requests without verifying that the request originated from the legitimate user. HCL BigFix Service Management, an IT service management platform, fails to implement proper anti-CSRF protections such as synchronization tokens or SameSite cookie attributes. An authenticated user with login privileges could be tricked into initiating unintended actions on the platform. The vulnerability affects all versions of the product according to the CPE specification (cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:bigfix_service_management_(sm):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), though patch versions may exist.
Know when Bigfix Service Management Sm gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
HHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Bigfix Service Management Sm
View allHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 ships with an outdated, vulnerable WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) ser
HCL BigFix Service Management (SX) is affected by a Broken Access Control vulnerability leading to privilege escalation.
HTTP request smuggling in HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) 23 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass front-
Credential exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 leaves credentials insufficiently protected for a b
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 ships with - or can be deployed in - a state where the host root filesyste
HCL BigFix Service Management contains unauthenticated-accessible directories that are not linked in the user interface
HCL BigFix Service Management lacks secure X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers, allowing browsers to perform MIME-type s
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) leaks sensitive information through improper error handling in its reporting module.
HCL BigFix Service Management exposes server banner information containing software versions and system details accessib
HCL BigFix Service Management Discovery accepts unencrypted HTTP traffic on port 80, allowing network-adjacent attackers
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) contains a Content Security Policy (CSP) header misconfiguration that enables cross-s
HCL BigFix Service Management fails to sanitize spreadsheet data (CSV, XLS, XLSX) before export, allowing authenticated
EUVD-2025-209687
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB