Skip to main content

HCL BigFix Service Management CVE-2025-31983

| EUVDEUVD-2025-209699 MEDIUM
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard (CWE-358)
2026-05-06 HCL GHSA-rmc9-985c-h9wg
4.6
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privilege user
  2. Delivery
    Submit malicious script in service request
  3. Exploit
    Script bypasses misconfigured CSP header
  4. Execution
    Execute in victim's browser context
  5. Persist
    Capture session token or credentials
  6. Impact
    Escalate privileges or lateral move

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Improperly implemented security check
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires four concrete conditions: (1) valid authenticated user account with at least read access to BigFix Service Management (PR:L in CVSS indicates low-privilege authentication), (2) ability to submit or modify data that will be reflected in other users' browsers (service requests, comments, or configuration fields), (3) a subsequent user with higher privileges must interact with (view, click on, or open) the injected content (UI:R), and (4) the CSP header must not block the injected script source or inline execution. The vulnerability is NOT exploitable against fully unauthenticated users or default deployments with authentication disabled. Attack complexity is marked as High (AC:H), implying the payload or delivery method requires specific conditions such as specific browser versions, JavaScript context isolation, or timing dependencies. Organizations with strong access controls, audit logging, and user training on phishing/social engineering have reduced realistic risk despite the authentication requirement.

Impact

CVSS score of 3.7 indicates low severity, driven by several mitigating factors: attack requires authentication (PR:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), user interaction (UI:R), and integrity impact is limited to information disclosure (C:L/I:N/A:L). However, CVSS does not fully capture the strategic risk. BigFix Service Management is deployed in enterprise environments where authenticated users (help desk staff, service managers, administrators) are common, reducing the PR:L barrier in practice. XSS in such platforms can lead to privilege escalation, lateral movement, or theft of API tokens and session credentials used for downstream system access. The combination of AC:H (suggesting a non-trivial exploit) and UI:R (requiring social engineering or accidental interaction) means exploitation is less probable than a raw CVSS score suggests, likely placing this in medium exploitation probability territory. No EPSS score provided, but the narrow attack surface (authenticated + user interaction required) and the fact that this is CSP misconfiguration rather than a memory safety bug suggest this is a lower-priority vulnerability unless the organization has insider threat concerns or high-value user accounts. KEV and POC status are not confirmed from available data, further suggesting limited real-world exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A malicious insider or compromised low-privilege user account (e.g., help desk agent) logged into BigFix Service Management crafts a malicious service request or comment containing JavaScript payload. Due to the CSP header misconfiguration, the payload is not blocked and executes in the context of other users' browsers when they view the request. The attacker captures session tokens or API credentials, then uses them to escalate privileges or pivot to connected systems managed by BigFix (servers, endpoints, and network devices).

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 06, 2026

HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) contains a Content Security Policy (CSP) header misconfiguration that enables cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. Authenticated users with low privileges can inject malicious scripts by exploiting insufficient CSP directives, potentially exposing sensitive information or hijacking user sessions. The vulnerability requires user interaction (UI:R) and operates in a non-global scope, limiting but not eliminating real-world risk.

RemediationAI

Immediate action requires applying the security patch from HCL Software. Users should review HCL support article KB0128144 for the specific patched version applicable to their deployment. The primary fix involves HCL updating CSP headers to enforce strict directives, eliminating 'unsafe-inline' script sources and limiting script-src to whitelisted, non-external origins. If an immediate patch is unavailable, implement compensating controls: configure a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block JavaScript injection patterns in request payloads and enforce Content-Security-Policy headers at the reverse proxy level with directives such as 'script-src self' and 'default-src self'. These controls reduce attack surface but may impact legitimate functionality if the application relies on inline scripts; coordinate with HCL support before deployment. Restrict access to BigFix Service Management administrative and authoring interfaces to trusted networks and apply rate-limiting and request validation on all user input fields.

Affected VersionsENISA

BigFix Service Management (SM) 23

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability stems from inadequate Content Security Policy (CSP) header configuration (CWE-358: Improperly Restricted Operations within Bounds of a Buffer), a web security control designed to prevent inline script injection and restrict script sources. BigFix Service Management, an enterprise IT service management platform typically deployed in security-sensitive environments, relies on CSP headers to defend against XSS attacks. When CSP headers are misconfigured-such as allowing 'unsafe-inline', overly permissive sources, or missing directives-attackers can inject JavaScript into the application context. The CPE indicates all versions of HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) are potentially affected, suggesting the misconfiguration is present across the product line until a patched version is released.

Know when Hcl gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 4.6 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Sep 30, 2026 - 22:23 NVD
LOW MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Sep 30, 2026 - 22:23 NVD
3.7 (LOW) 4.6 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionNVD

HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration vulnerability due to CSP header. This could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts increasing the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) and potential exposure of sensitive information.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 91% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

23
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +23
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

More in Hcl

View all
CVE-2025-31998 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 12

Information disclosure in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain sensi

CVE-2026-67100 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

SQL injection and cross-tenant data exposure flaws in HCL BigFix Service Management allow an attacker who can reach the

CVE-2025-59851 CRITICAL
9.8 May 06

HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier ship with outdated third-party libraries or sub-components that carry publicly known vu

CVE-2025-62319 CRITICAL
9.8 Mar 16

A Boolean-based SQL injection vulnerability exists in HCL Unica that allows remote attackers to manipulate backend datab

CVE-2025-59852 CRITICAL
9.1 May 06

HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier transmit sensitive data across the network without transport encryption, allowing anyon

CVE-2025-31951 HIGH
8.8 May 06

Command injection in HCL BigFix RunBookAI 11.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating syst

CVE-2025-52613 HIGH
8.8 May 06

HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 ships with an outdated, vulnerable WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) ser

CVE-2024-30151 HIGH
8.3 May 06

HCL BigFix Service Management (SX) is affected by a Broken Access Control vulnerability leading to privilege escalation.

CVE-2025-55262 HIGH
8.3 Mar 26

SQL injection in HCL Aftermarket DPC version 1.0.0 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to extract sensitive databas

CVE-2026-67102 HIGH
8.1 Sep 18

Broken access control in HCL BigFix Service Management lets a low-privileged authenticated user reach administrative scr

CVE-2025-59874 HIGH
8.1 Jun 04

Content Security Policy weakness in HCL Hive Telco Observability's Keycloak authentication component allows remote attac

CVE-2025-55261 HIGH
8.1 Mar 26

Missing functional level access control in HCL Aftermarket DPC version 1.0.0 enables privilege escalation attacks that c

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy