Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure authenticated user or gain XSS foothold
-
ExploitAccess cookie lacking HttpOnly/Secure
-
ExecutionSteal or replay session token
-
ImpactPerform actions as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A02:2025 - Security Misconfiguration
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Secure cookie flag
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation is not standalone: it requires a pre-existing enabler against the BigFix Service Management web application - either an active XSS vector to read the HttpOnly-less session cookie, a cross-site attack page to abuse the missing SameSite attribute (CSRF), or an on-path/network-interception position to capture the cookie sent without the Secure flag over cleartext. Limiting factors per the vendor vector: an authenticated session must exist (PR:L), the victim must perform an action (UI:R), attack complexity is high (AC:H), and impact is confined to low-level confidentiality (C:L) with no integrity or availability effect. Requires an application deployed without hardened cookie attributes. |
| Impact | This is a low-priority, defense-in-depth weakness rather than a directly exploitable flaw. CWE-614 (missing cookie security attributes - SameSite, HttpOnly, Secure, restrictive Path) is an enabler: it does not itself grant access but lowers the barrier for other attacks (CSRF, session hijacking via XSS, session interception over cleartext). The vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N = 2.2) is deliberately conservative, reflecting that real impact requires a chained condition (an existing XSS, an on-path position, or a tricked user) and yields only low confidentiality loss. There is a notable internal tension: the description frames the consequences (CSRF, XSS-driven session hijacking, 'unauthorized access') as network/remote browser attacks, yet the vector asserts AV:L and AC:H with low privileges and user interaction - the AV:L assignment is questionable for cookie-borne CSRF/hijacking and should be verified against the vendor advisory. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept were provided; absence of these signals is consistent with a low-severity hardening issue unlikely to see opportunistic mass exploitation. Overall: genuine hygiene defect worth patching in routine cycles, not an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a cross-site scripting foothold in the BigFix Service Management web interface (or an on-path position on an unencrypted link) reads or replays an authenticated user's session cookie because HttpOnly/Secure are absent, then reuses it to act as that user. Alternatively, the missing SameSite attribute lets a malicious page issue cross-site requests that ride the victim's session (CSRF). No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026
Insecure cookie attribute configuration in HCL BigFix Service Management allows attackers to facilitate cross-site request forgery, session hijacking via cross-site scripting, and unauthorized access when a pre-existing enabler - such as an active XSS vector, a cross-site attack page, or an on-path network position - is present. This is a low-priority, defense-in-depth weakness rather than a directly exploitable flaw; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. The vulnerability requires an application deployed without hardened cookie attributes (missing Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite, and restrictive Path), and exploitation yields only low-level confidentiality impact.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Apply the vendor's guidance from the advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015. As compensating controls, configure the web application or its reverse proxy to set the Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite=Strict (or Lax if Strict breaks functionality) attributes on all session cookies, and restrict the cookie Path to the application's base path. Trade-offs: SameSite=Strict may break legitimate cross-site navigation or embedded content; Secure requires HTTPS termination and will prevent cookies from being sent over HTTP; HttpOnly prevents JavaScript access but can break client-side features that read cookies; a restrictive Path may break functionality if the application uses multiple subpaths. Deploy the application exclusively over HTTPS to mitigate on-path cookie capture. Additionally, address any existing XSS vulnerabilities to prevent session theft.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability class is CWE-614, which describes sensitive cookies (e.g., session tokens) transmitted over HTTPS without the Secure attribute. In HCL BigFix Service Management, session cookies are set without critical security attributes: Secure (so cookies may be sent over cleartext HTTP, enabling on-path interception), HttpOnly (so client-side scripts can read the cookie, enabling session theft via XSS), SameSite (so browsers include the cookie in cross-site requests, enabling CSRF), and restrictive Path (so the cookie is exposed to a broader set of endpoints than necessary). These weaknesses do not directly grant access; they require an additional attack vector such as an XSS flaw, a malicious cross-site page, or network interception to be exploited. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:hcl_bigfix_service_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates all versions are potentially affected. The independent assessment notes that exploitation requires a pre-existing enabler and that impact is limited to low confidentiality, consistent with the vendor's high attack complexity and user interaction requirement.
Know when Hcl Bigfix Service Management gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CSRF/XSS-assisted session hijacking is a remote browser attack (AV:N), needs a chained enabler and victim action (AC:H/UI:R), no attacker auth for CSRF (PR:N); only low confidentiality impact - diverges from vendor's AV:L/PR:L.
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Cookie Attribute Configuration vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to exploit missing security attributes such as SameSite, HttpOnly, Secure, and restrictive Paths, enabling Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), session hijacking via Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and unauthorized access.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Interception of unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an on-path attac
Stored cross-site scripting in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker persist malicious script inside the applic
Sustained brute-force attacks against the HCL BigFix Service Management v27 login interface are possible because the pro
Unrestricted file upload in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker submit a crafted file through the product's u
Server-side request forgery in the search functionality of HCL BigFix Service Management allows remote attackers to make
An exposed API endpoint in HCL BigFix Service Management returns sensitive internal database information to remote, unau
Information disclosure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve sensitive da
Inspection of publicly served JavaScript in BigFix Service Management lets unauthenticated remote users discover hidden
HCL BigFix Service Management exposes internal IP addresses through its own HTTP responses - response headers, error mes
Cross-tenant data exposure in HCL BigFix Service Management allows an authenticated user with a valid account in one ten
Input validation failures in HCL BigFix Service Management allow remote attackers to inject malformed data into the appl
HCL BigFix Service Management ships with a CORS misconfiguration (CWE-942) in which Origin headers are improperly valida
EUVD-2026-90878
GHSA-5f5p-47q4-96cg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB