Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconVictim visits attacker-controlled HTML page
-
DeliverySeparate renderer vulnerability exploited
-
ExploitRenderer process compromised
-
InstallCraft malicious DevTools input
-
C2Trigger CWE-20 validation flaw in DevTools
-
ExecuteEscape Chrome sandbox
-
ImpactExecute code on host OS
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires two sequential conditions: first, the attacker must have already compromised the Chrome renderer process (a separate, preceding vulnerability is required); second, the victim user must interact with a crafted HTML page (UI:R), providing the entry point for the DevTools input validation flaw. DevTools must be accessible in the target Chrome installation - disabling DevTools via enterprise policy would eliminate this attack vector. Limiting factors include the renderer pre-compromise prerequisite (AC:H), required user interaction, and the necessity of a network-reachable victim. The CVSS vector PR:N indicates no authenticated session is needed from the attacker's perspective for the DevTools stage itself, but the renderer compromise prerequisite is a significant practical barrier. This is not a default-configuration remote unauthenticated exploit; it is a second-stage sandbox escape chained after a separate renderer vulnerability. |
| Impact | Despite a CVSS base score of 5.8 (Medium), the real-world risk is nuanced. The S:C (Scope Changed) metric confirms that successful exploitation breaches the Chrome sandbox - an impactful outcome. However, AC:H indicates high attack complexity: exploitation requires a prior renderer process compromise as a prerequisite, making this a second-stage payload rather than a standalone exploit. UI:R further constrains exploitability to scenarios where a victim visits a crafted HTML page. EPSS of 0.18% (8th percentile) confirms low observed exploitation in the wild, consistent with the chained-exploit requirement. No CISA KEV listing is present. The C:L/I:L/A:L impact triplet assigned by Google reflects a conservative view of the sandbox escape scope - notably, a full sandbox escape could plausibly achieve higher host-level impact than these metrics suggest; defenders should not assume the escape is harmless. This is a genuine medium-priority issue: critical for users in targeted threat scenarios but unlikely to see mass automated exploitation due to AC:H and the renderer pre-compromise requirement. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already achieved renderer process compromise - for example, via a separate memory corruption bug in Chrome's JavaScript engine - serves the victim a crafted HTML page that triggers malicious DevTools interactions. The insufficient input validation in DevTools processes the attacker-controlled renderer data without proper sanitization, allowing the attacker to break out of Chrome's sandbox and execute code at the host OS privilege level. No public exploit or proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 30, 2026
Sandbox escape in Google Chrome DevTools prior to version 151.0.7922.72 requires a pre-compromised renderer process and user interaction with a crafted HTML page to break out of the browser sandbox. The root cause is insufficient input validation (CWE-20) in the DevTools component, where attacker-controlled input from the renderer is not properly sanitized before being processed. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing is present at time of analysis; EPSS is 0.18%, indicating low observed exploitation pressure despite the meaningful impact of a successful sandbox escape.
RemediationAI
Update Google Chrome to version 151.0.7922.72 or later, available via the Chrome stable channel update announced at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html. Chrome typically auto-updates; users should verify their version at chrome://settings/help and force an update if needed. As a compensating control pending update, disabling or restricting access to Chrome DevTools in managed enterprise environments (via the DevToolsDisabled policy) would eliminate the vulnerable attack surface but at the cost of removing developer and diagnostic functionality. Organizations running Chromium-based embedded browsers should track the upstream Chromium fix referenced at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/524029061 and apply vendor-specific patches accordingly.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Google Chrome's multi-process security architecture isolates web content inside a sandboxed renderer process. DevTools - Chrome's built-in developer tooling - bridges the renderer and the browser process, processing data and commands that may originate from web content. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) in DevTools means that data arriving from the renderer is accepted without adequate sanitization or bounds checking, allowing a compromised renderer to send crafted inputs that influence privileged DevTools logic. The affected component is identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covering all Chrome versions prior to 151.0.7922.72. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C reflects the scoped impact - a successful exploit crosses security boundaries from the sandboxed renderer into the broader system context, hence S:C.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
AC:H reflects mandatory renderer pre-compromise; S:C captures sandbox escape; C/I/A:L follows vendor's conservative scoping of the escape's host impact.
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Related Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome 151 Security Vulnerabilities
View all 80Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allSame technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-50639
GHSA-gc7w-qpqq-h9x5
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB