Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain unprivileged local access on GPU host
-
DeliveryInvoke vulnerable kernel-mode driver interface
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds write in kernel memory
-
ExecutionCorrupt kernel structures / hijack control flow
-
ImpactEscalate to SYSTEM/root or crash host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local access to a machine running an affected NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla families) on Windows or Linux, plus the ability to run code at low/standard user privilege (PR:L) to reach the kernel-mode driver interface. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no special non-default configuration is called out - the vulnerable kernel mode layer is part of the standard driver install. What limits exploitation is the local-only attack vector (AV:L): the attacker must already have a foothold on the host; this cannot be triggered remotely. The 'Guest Driver' tag suggests virtualized/vGPU or guest-VM driver deployments are also in scope, which is relevant for GPU-accelerated VDI and datacenter environments. |
| Impact | This is a genuine, high-priority local privilege-escalation class flaw despite lacking sensational signals. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects a locally-exploitable, low-complexity, low-privilege kernel-mode out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) with full high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The local attack vector (AV:L) and requirement for existing low-privilege access (PR:L) mean this is not a remote/wormable threat - it is a post-access escalation primitive, which is why the score is 7.8 rather than critical. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. There is no SSVC data supplied. The signals are internally consistent (local kernel OOB write → PR:L, S:U, full CIA impact), so there is no CVSS-versus-description conflict to flag. NVIDIA GPU driver kernel flaws are historically attractive to LPE exploit developers and are frequently chained after initial access (e.g., from a sandboxed process or a foothold on a GPU-equipped workstation/server), so while raw exploitation probability data is absent, the practical risk to affected fleets is real and warrants prompt patching. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local attacker who already has an unprivileged foothold on a Windows or Linux host with a vulnerable NVIDIA GPU driver issues crafted requests to the kernel-mode driver, triggering an out-of-bounds write in kernel memory. By controlling the overwritten kernel data, they corrupt kernel structures to escalate to SYSTEM/root, achieve kernel code execution, or crash the machine. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, and exploitation requires prior local access and low-level privileges. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver kernel-mode layer allows a user with standard privileges to trigger an out-of-bounds write in kernel memory, potentially achieving kernel-level code execution, denial of service, information disclosure and data tampering. The affected driver branches span NVIDIA GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS and Tesla families on both Windows and Linux, and the 'Guest Driver' tag indicates virtualized/vGPU and guest-VM driver deployments are also in scope, which matters for GPU-accelerated VDI and datacenter estates. Exploitation is constrained to the host: the CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.8), so an attacker must already have a foothold and the ability to run code as a low-privileged local user; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is to update to the patched NVIDIA driver branch published in NVIDIA's product-security advisory for 2026 at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 - the exact fixed driver version is not enumerated in the available data, so administrators must confirm the corresponding Windows/Linux driver release for each affected family (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, Tesla, and the guest/vGPU driver) against that bulletin before closing the ticket. Because the attack vector is local (AV:L) with low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction, the practical compensating controls are host-hardening ones rather than network controls: enforce least-privilege so untrusted local code cannot run on GPU-enabled workstations or VDI guests, restrict who can log into GPU nodes, and treat driver updates as a fleet-wide maintenance item since the vulnerable layer ships with the standard driver install and disabling it is not a viable option. In virtualized and VDI deployments the guest driver is the exposure point, so update both hypervisor-host drivers and guest-VM drivers, and note that withholding the update means accepting a kernel memory-corruption surface reachable by any local user; there is no known network-facing mitigation or feature toggle that removes the vulnerability short of patching. At the time of analysis there is no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation, so prioritization can follow standard high-risk local privilege-escalation patching cadence rather than emergency response.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in the kernel mode layer of NVIDIA's GPU display driver. Display drivers expose a privileged kernel interface (ioctl/escape handlers) that user-mode components and applications call to allocate GPU resources, map memory and submit commands; low-privileged processes can reach this interface without any special configuration, since the vulnerable layer is part of a standard driver install. The root cause class is improper validation of a user-supplied length, index or offset, so that a driver write lands past the end of an allocated kernel buffer. Because the corruption occurs in kernel context, a successful primitive translates into memory corruption of kernel structures, yielding arbitrary kernel writes that can be leveraged for elevation of privileges to SYSTEM/root, kernel or system crashes (DoS), leakage of kernel memory contents, and modification of protected data. The linked CPE entries map to four NVIDIA driver product lines - geForce, rtx,_quadro,_nvs and tesla - across Windows and Linux builds, and the 'Guest Driver' tag specifically flags the vGPU/guest driver variant used inside virtual machines, meaning the same kernel interface is present in guest operating systems under GPU passthrough or vGPU virtualization.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local low-privilege user triggers a kernel-mode out-of-bounds write with no user interaction, yielding kernel code execution and full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).
CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia
DescriptionCVE.org
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where a user could cause an out-of-bounds write. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.
Articles & Coverage 4
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity privilege-escalation flaw in NVIDIA's GPU Display Driver affects GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS and Tesla products on both Windows and Linux, including virtualized vGPU and guest-VM deployments, allowing anyone who already holds an ordinary local account on a workstation, GPU server or VDI host to reach kernel-level control of that system. Because no vendor fix is available yet, GPU-accelerated desktop, VDI and datacenter estates remain exposed to data tampering, information disclosure and denial of service until NVIDIA ships a corrected driver. Leadership should treat this as a driver patch-management and shared-GPU tenancy risk rather than an external perimeter threat, since exploitation requires an existing foothold and local code execution.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary local interactive accounts on GPU-bearing workstations, GPU servers and VDI hosts; restrict local/console logon so only trusted administrators can run code on those systems; deploy application allowlisting to block unapproved executables in user context; enable EDR kernel-mode monitoring and alerting for driver abuse and privilege-escalation behavior; isolate multi-tenant vGPU and guest-VM workloads and tightly control GPU passthrough to trusted tenants; maintain tested backups and recovery for affected GPU hosts; and adopt the vendor driver update immediately once NVIDIA publishes it.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Same weakness CWE-787 – Out-of-bounds Write
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-90097
GHSA-qv7q-pg3p-9vx9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB