Skip to main content

NVIDIA Display Driver EUVDEUVD-2026-90162

| CVE-2026-47543 MEDIUM
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-09-30 nvidia GHSA-p38c-9qfh-9wqh
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege local account
  2. Delivery
    Craft malformed input to kernel-mode driver
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper input validation flaw
  4. Execution
    Achieve kernel code execution or crash
  5. Impact
    Escalate privileges / DoS / disclose kernel memory

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access with HIGH privileges (PR:H) - the attacker must already be an administrator/root-equivalent user on a host running the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows or Linux (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla). No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no special product feature toggle is named; the trigger is submitting improperly validated input to the kernel-mode driver layer. The dominant limiting factor is the PR:H prerequisite: an unprivileged local user or a remote attacker cannot reach this directly, so real-world risk is confined to scenarios where a high-privilege account or process is compromised and used to attack the kernel (e.g., sandbox/kernel-integrity bypass in hardened or multi-tenant GPU hosts).

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 6.7) is internally consistent and describes a LOCAL, HIGH-privilege vulnerability, not a remote one - despite the 'RCE' tag, network exploitation is not possible (AV:L). The most important limiting signal is PR:H: an attacker must already hold high/administrative privileges on the host before triggering the flaw, which sharply reduces net escalation value and places this below the many PR:L siblings in NVIDIA bulletin 5861. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. There are no conflicting signals in the vector itself; the main conflict is between the marketing-style 'RCE' tag and the actual local-only vector - verify that this is local kernel-mode driver abuse, not remote code execution. Overall this is a moderate-severity, defense-in-depth kernel driver bug rather than a top-priority emergency: real for hardened multi-tenant/workstation environments but gated by the PR:H precondition.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has high/administrative privileges on a Windows or Linux system with NVIDIA GPU drivers installed submits malformed input to the kernel-mode driver layer, which fails to validate it properly. The resulting memory/state corruption is leveraged for kernel-level code execution, privilege escalation into the kernel context, or a driver/system crash. No public exploit code is known, and exploitation requires prior high-privilege local access.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Improper input validation in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver kernel-mode layer allows a local high-privileged attacker to achieve code execution, denial of service, privilege escalation, information disclosure, or data tampering. Affected products include GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla drivers on Windows and Linux. Exploitation requires administrator or root-equivalent access (PR:H), so risk is limited to scenarios where a high-privilege account is already compromised; no public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified at time of analysis; monitor NVIDIA's product security page at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 for a patched driver release. Until a fix is available, restrict administrator and root privileges to trusted users, as exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H). Additionally, consider implementing application whitelisting and endpoint detection to monitor for privilege escalation attempts. In multi-tenant or sandboxed environments, isolate GPU workloads to reduce the risk of kernel-level compromise. Once a patch is released, apply it promptly according to NVIDIA's instructions.

Affected VersionsENISA

RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the kernel-mode layer of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver, which handles low-level operations for graphics and compute workloads. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) indicates that the driver fails to adequately validate input before processing it, potentially leading to memory corruption or logic errors. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms that the attack requires local access and high privileges (administrator/root), with no user interaction. Affected products per CPE include NVIDIA GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla driver families. Despite the 'RCE' tag, the local attack vector (AV:L) means this cannot be exploited remotely over a network.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Kernel-mode driver reachable only locally (AV:L) by an already high-privileged user (PR:H); no interaction (UI:N); improper input validation yields full local CIA impact within the same system scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE HIGH
Red Hat 6.7 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

VIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an attacker could cause improper input validation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GeForce/RTX/Quadro/Tesla drivers deployed across vast Windows and Linux install base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy