Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privilege local account
-
DeliveryCraft malformed input to kernel-mode driver
-
ExploitTrigger improper input validation flaw
-
ExecutionAchieve kernel code execution or crash
-
ImpactEscalate privileges / DoS / disclose kernel memory
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires local access with HIGH privileges (PR:H) - the attacker must already be an administrator/root-equivalent user on a host running the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows or Linux (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla). No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no special product feature toggle is named; the trigger is submitting improperly validated input to the kernel-mode driver layer. The dominant limiting factor is the PR:H prerequisite: an unprivileged local user or a remote attacker cannot reach this directly, so real-world risk is confined to scenarios where a high-privilege account or process is compromised and used to attack the kernel (e.g., sandbox/kernel-integrity bypass in hardened or multi-tenant GPU hosts). |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 6.7) is internally consistent and describes a LOCAL, HIGH-privilege vulnerability, not a remote one - despite the 'RCE' tag, network exploitation is not possible (AV:L). The most important limiting signal is PR:H: an attacker must already hold high/administrative privileges on the host before triggering the flaw, which sharply reduces net escalation value and places this below the many PR:L siblings in NVIDIA bulletin 5861. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. There are no conflicting signals in the vector itself; the main conflict is between the marketing-style 'RCE' tag and the actual local-only vector - verify that this is local kernel-mode driver abuse, not remote code execution. Overall this is a moderate-severity, defense-in-depth kernel driver bug rather than a top-priority emergency: real for hardened multi-tenant/workstation environments but gated by the PR:H precondition. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has high/administrative privileges on a Windows or Linux system with NVIDIA GPU drivers installed submits malformed input to the kernel-mode driver layer, which fails to validate it properly. The resulting memory/state corruption is leveraged for kernel-level code execution, privilege escalation into the kernel context, or a driver/system crash. No public exploit code is known, and exploitation requires prior high-privilege local access. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Improper input validation in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver kernel-mode layer allows a local high-privileged attacker to achieve code execution, denial of service, privilege escalation, information disclosure, or data tampering. Affected products include GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla drivers on Windows and Linux. Exploitation requires administrator or root-equivalent access (PR:H), so risk is limited to scenarios where a high-privilege account is already compromised; no public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified at time of analysis; monitor NVIDIA's product security page at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 for a patched driver release. Until a fix is available, restrict administrator and root privileges to trusted users, as exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H). Additionally, consider implementing application whitelisting and endpoint detection to monitor for privilege escalation attempts. In multi-tenant or sandboxed environments, isolate GPU workloads to reduce the risk of kernel-level compromise. Once a patch is released, apply it promptly according to NVIDIA's instructions.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability resides in the kernel-mode layer of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver, which handles low-level operations for graphics and compute workloads. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) indicates that the driver fails to adequately validate input before processing it, potentially leading to memory corruption or logic errors. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms that the attack requires local access and high privileges (administrator/root), with no user interaction. Affected products per CPE include NVIDIA GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla driver families. Despite the 'RCE' tag, the local attack vector (AV:L) means this cannot be exploited remotely over a network.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Kernel-mode driver reachable only locally (AV:L) by an already high-privileged user (PR:H); no interaction (UI:N); improper input validation yields full local CIA impact within the same system scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).
CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia
DescriptionCVE.org
VIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an attacker could cause improper input validation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-90162
GHSA-p38c-9qfh-9wqh
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB