Skip to main content

NVIDIA Display Driver EUVDEUVD-2026-90159

| CVE-2026-47538 MEDIUM
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)
2026-09-30 nvidia GHSA-5f39-rw2r-m97m
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege local access on host
  2. Delivery
    Invoke affected GPU firmware interface
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt firmware/kernel memory
  5. Impact
    Execute code / escalate / tamper / DoS

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access to a Windows or Linux host running an affected NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla) AND high existing privileges (PR:H - effectively administrator/root or an equivalently privileged context able to reach the firmware interface). No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no network path exists (AV:L). The primary limiting factors are the high-privilege prerequisite, which confines exploitation to attackers who already control the host at an elevated level, and the local-only attack surface, which rules out remote exploitation entirely.

Impact

Real-world risk is moderate, not urgent. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U, base 6.7) is the dominant signal and it is internally consistent: exploitation is local-only and requires HIGH privileges, so this is a privilege-bounded firmware flaw, not a remotely reachable one. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input, so there is no evidence of active or imminent exploitation. The 'RCE' tag overstates reachability - with AV:L there is no network vector, so any code execution is strictly local. The PR:H requirement is the key mitigating factor: an attacker must already hold high privileges (effectively administrator/root on the host) to reach the vulnerable firmware path, which dramatically shrinks the realistic attacker population and caps this as a local escalation/tamper issue rather than a mass-exploitable one. High CIA impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) keeps severity meaningful where the precondition is met. Net: a genuine but lower-priority patch item - high product footprint, low exploitation likelihood, high privilege barrier.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local attacker who already possesses high privileges on a Windows or Linux host with an affected NVIDIA GPU driver crafts input that reaches the vulnerable firmware code path, triggering an out-of-bounds write. The memory corruption is then leveraged to execute code in a firmware/kernel context, escalate beyond the current privilege boundary, tamper with data, or crash the device. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and no network vector exists.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

An out-of-bounds write in the firmware component of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux lets a local attacker who already holds administrator or root privileges corrupt memory, with potential outcomes spanning code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, information disclosure and data tampering. Rated CVSS 6.7 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, CWE-787), the flaw affects GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS and Tesla products; exploitation requires local access to the host plus high existing privileges, and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, so real-world risk is moderate rather than urgent. No user interaction is required and there is no network attack path, which rules out remote exploitation entirely.

RemediationAI

The authoritative fix path is the NVIDIA product-security bulletin at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861, which lists the corrected GPU Display Driver builds for the affected GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS and Tesla branches; exact patched driver version numbers were not included in the data provided for this analysis, so administrators should consult that bulletin (and the NVD entry at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47538) to identify the specific release for each platform rather than assuming a generic "latest driver" version, then upgrade Windows and Linux hosts accordingly. Because exploitation requires local access plus administrator or root privileges (PR:H), the highest-value compensating controls are privilege hygiene and host hardening: reduce the number of accounts with local administrative/root rights, remove or tightly scope interactive logon for service and automation accounts that have kernel-level access, and audit for processes able to reach the GPU firmware interface. Where immediate driver upgrades are impractical - for example on validated data-center Tesla nodes or certified professional workstations with locked-down driver stacks - pair the temporary deferral with host-level containment such as enabling Virtualization-based Security / Hypervisor-protected Code Integrity on Windows or kernel lockdown and module-signature enforcement on Linux, which raises the bar for turning a firmware memory-corruption primitive into full code execution at the cost of some performance overhead and occasional third-party driver compatibility issues. Traditional network defenses (firewalls, port blocking, WAF rules) provide no coverage here because the vector is strictly local with no network path, so effort should be redirected toward privileged-access review, driver version inventory and patch tracking rather than perimeter controls.

Affected VersionsENISA

GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The issue is a classic memory-safety defect (CWE-787, out-of-bounds write) residing in the GPU Display Driver's firmware layer rather than in a user-facing service or network daemon. The supplied CPE strings enumerate affected product families across multiple driver branches: nvidia:geforce, nvidia:rtx,_quadro,_nvs, and nvidia:tesla, each appearing repeatedly, indicating that the firmware image is shipped across several driver release trains and hardware generations for both Windows and Linux. Because the write occurs below the normal application boundary, a successful trigger can corrupt firmware/driver-managed memory and cascade into kernel- or firmware-level control-flow abuse, which is why the impact vector rates confidentiality, integrity and availability all as High. The attack surface is strictly local (AV:L) with no user-interaction requirement (UI:N) and scope unchanged (S:U), and the CVSS vector's PR:H means the attacker must already operate in a privileged context - effectively administrator or root, or an equivalently privileged process able to reach the firmware interface. That privilege prerequisite, combined with the absence of any remote or adjacent vector, is the dominant constraint on the severity of this bug and explains the moderate 6.7 score despite the High CIA impact.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Firmware path is reachable only locally (AV:L) by an already high-privileged actor (PR:H), no user interaction, with full CIA impact from the OOB write within an unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE HIGH
Red Hat MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the firmware where an attacker could cause an out-of-bounds write. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GeForce/RTX/Quadro/NVS/Tesla drivers span consumer, workstation, and datacenter GPUs
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy