Skip to main content

NVIDIA Display Driver EUVDEUVD-2026-90154

| CVE-2026-47527 MEDIUM
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)
2026-09-30 nvidia GHSA-qgj8-vhf6-wwr2
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege local access
  2. Delivery
    Call vulnerable GPU firmware interface
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read
  4. Execution
    Leak memory or crash driver
  5. Impact
    Escalate or deny service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access to a system running an affected NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla) on Windows or Linux, with the attacker already holding HIGH privileges (PR:H) sufficient to invoke the vulnerable firmware code path - no remote vector and no user interaction. The flaw is in the GPU firmware layer reached via the driver. Note the GeForce 582.78 branch is limited to GPUs on NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architectures per the EUVD version notes; other listed branches are not architecture-restricted. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: local-only reach, the pre-existing high-privilege requirement, and that an out-of-bounds read most often produces a crash or memory disclosure rather than dependable code execution.

Impact

This is a genuine-but-moderate-priority local vulnerability, not a high-CVSS remote emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 6.7 Medium) is internally consistent with the description: local attack vector, low complexity, but requiring HIGH privileges (PR:H) on the host before the flaw can be reached. The 'RCE' tag overstates reach - with AV:L there is no network attack surface, so any code execution is local-only and gated behind existing high privilege. No EPSS score, CISA KEV entry, or public POC is present in the supplied data, and no SSVC decision block was provided; per precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Practical exploitation value is low because an attacker who already holds PR:H on the machine has limited additional to gain, and CWE-125 (out-of-bounds READ) more realistically yields a crash (DoS) or information disclosure than reliable arbitrary code execution, despite the vendor listing the full impact spectrum. Net: real and worth patching in managed fleets, but not a drop-everything issue given local-only access and the high-privilege precondition.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained high-privileged access on a workstation or GPU compute node (e.g., an administrator account or a privileged service context) invokes the vulnerable GPU firmware interface with crafted parameters, triggering an out-of-bounds read. This most plausibly leaks adjacent kernel/firmware memory or crashes the GPU driver stack (DoS); code execution is claimed by the vendor but is harder to achieve from an OOB read. No public exploit code is known at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Out-of-bounds read in the firmware component of NVIDIA GPU Display Drivers for Windows and Linux allows a local attacker who already holds high privileges (PR:H, per CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) to read memory beyond intended firmware buffer bounds, most plausibly resulting in memory disclosure or a driver/GPU crash, with the vendor also flagging the potential for code execution, escalation of privileges and data tampering. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.7; the attack path is local-only, requires no user interaction, and is gated behind pre-existing high privilege, which materially limits real-world exposure. No public exploit code has been identified for this issue and it is not in CISA KEV, so no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to the fixed driver version for your branch and product family as published by NVIDIA - GeForce branches at 610.57.04, 610.60, 615.71.09, 616.56, 595.91.07, and 580.178.04, with 582.78 applying only to Maxwell, Volta and Pascal GPUs; RTX/Quadro/NVS branches at 610.88, 596.86, 615.71.09, 610.57.04, 616.92, 580.178.04, 595.91.07 and 582.78; and Tesla branches at 615.71.09, 596.86, 610.57.04, 616.92, 610.88, 580.178.04 and 595.91.07. Confirm the exact branch-to-version mapping and any OS-specific (Windows vs. Linux) packaging against the NVIDIA advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 before deploying, since the same numeric version may correspond to different Windows and Linux packaging streams. Where immediate driver upgrades are not operationally feasible (for example, validated data-center or workstation images on Tesla/Quadro hardware), the principal compensating control is reducing the population that can reach firmware entry points: remove local administrator and kernel-level access from non-essential users, avoid exposing GPU devices (e.g., /dev/nvidia* on Linux or equivalent device handles) to untrusted or multi-tenant workloads, and isolate GPU-accelerated workloads in dedicated VMs or containers with device passthrough restricted to the hosting hypervisor. These controls carry real trade-offs - GPU passthrough restrictions break GPU-accelerated containers and virtual desktop sessions, and removing local admin rights can disrupt driver management and diagnostics tooling - so they should be treated as temporary measures until the fixed driver version is deployed. No vendor workaround that disables the vulnerable firmware path alone has been identified, and no public exploit code is known at time of analysis, so patching remains the primary and preferred remedy.

Affected VersionsENISA

GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) located in GPU firmware rather than in user-mode driver code, and it is reached through the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver on both Windows and Linux. Because the read occurs in the firmware layer, the driver provides the reachable interface through which a high-privileged local caller can drive the GPU into the vulnerable code path; the CPE data confirms the affected stacks span NVIDIA GeForce, the RTX/Quadro/NVS professional lines, and the Tesla (data-center) product families, indicating the same firmware defect is shared across consumer, workstation and server GPU branches. An OOB read of this class typically yields an information leak or a firmware/driver crash (denial of service) because the hardware faults on the invalid access; turning it into reliable code execution requires additional memory-corruption primitives that the vendor-advisory language anticipates but does not demonstrate. The CVSS temporal/environmental posture is unchanged from the assessed base vector, and the high integrity and confidentiality impact ratings reflect the sensitivity of GPU firmware and the memory it touches rather than a confirmed, demonstrated exploit chain.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Local firmware-driver interface reachable only with high privilege (AV:L, PR:H); low complexity, no UI; vendor asserts full C/I/A impact, so kept high though OOB read leans toward DoS/info-disc.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE HIGH
Red Hat 6.7 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the firmware where an attacker could cause an out-of-bounds read. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GeForce/RTX/Quadro/Tesla drivers are on a huge share of Windows/Linux GPU hosts
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy