Skip to main content

NVIDIA DGX Spark EUVDEUVD-2026-65602

| CVE-2026-24262 HIGH
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)
2026-08-25 nvidia GHSA-p6fm-c6gf-c334
8.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain firmware-level or BMC admin access
  2. Delivery
    Craft out-of-bounds write payload
  3. Exploit
    Submit malicious input to firmware interface
  4. Execution
    Corrupt adjacent firmware memory structures
  5. Persist
    Cross firmware isolation boundary (scope change)
  6. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code or escalate privileges at OS/hypervisor level

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local access to the DGX Spark appliance and high operating privileges (mapped as PR:H in the CVSS vector), consistent with firmware-level or BMC administrative access - not ordinary OS user credentials. The attack is confined to local access (AV:L), meaning remote unauthenticated exploitation is not possible without a separate initial-access step. The vulnerability is in the system firmware itself; exploitation is not conditional on a specific optional feature being enabled, but does require the attacker to have a pathway to interact with firmware interfaces. Factors limiting exploitation: (1) high privilege prerequisite rules out unprivileged local users and remote unauthenticated attackers; (2) physical or network-based access to the out-of-band management interface is typically required; (3) DGX Spark appliances are generally deployed in controlled datacenter environments, not exposed to untrusted users.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 is driven primarily by the scope-change (S:C) and full CIA triad impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), which appropriately reflects how a firmware-level compromise can cascade into the host OS. However, the mandatory prerequisites of local access (AV:L) and high privileges (PR:H) substantially constrain the realistic attacker pool to those who already have administrative or firmware-management access to the appliance - insider threat, supply-chain tampering, or post-exploitation pivots are the most plausible paths. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from this source. There is no CISA KEV listing and no reported public exploit code, which together suggest this has not yet seen opportunistic exploitation. The absence of EPSS data is a meaningful gap: without it, prioritization must lean on contextual factors rather than empirical exploitation probability. The S:C component is the critical differentiator - any organization running DGX Spark nodes as shared AI infrastructure, where firmware compromise could laterally affect co-tenant workloads or the management plane, should treat this as a higher operational priority than the PR:H prerequisite alone might suggest.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained high-privilege local access to a DGX Spark node - through credential theft, insider access, or a prior privilege escalation from a lower-privileged OS account - crafts a malicious input to a firmware interface that triggers the out-of-bounds write. The corrupted firmware memory allows the attacker to redirect firmware execution flow, breaking out of the firmware's isolation boundary and gaining capabilities at a scope that can affect the host OS or management plane. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 25, 2026

Out-of-bounds write in NVIDIA DGX Spark system firmware permits a locally authenticated, highly privileged attacker to corrupt firmware memory in a way that crosses the firmware's isolation boundary into the broader system. Successful exploitation may yield arbitrary code execution, privilege escalation beyond the initial firmware context, denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering - all stemming from a single CWE-787 write primitive. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the scope-changing nature of the CVSS vector (S:C) elevates the potential blast radius significantly for affected AI compute infrastructure.

RemediationAI

Consult the NVIDIA Product Security advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5867 for authoritative patch guidance; no specific fixed firmware version number was present in the input data, so a patched release version cannot be independently confirmed from this analysis. While awaiting a confirmed patch, compensating controls should focus on restricting who can access firmware management interfaces: limit BMC/IPMI and UEFI configuration access to a dedicated, tightly controlled administrative role; enforce network segmentation so that out-of-band management interfaces (e.g., BMC LAN) are reachable only from a hardened jump host; audit and rotate firmware management credentials; and monitor for unauthorized firmware update operations via system event logs. These controls reduce the attacker's ability to reach the privileged local position required to trigger the vulnerability, without affecting normal DGX Spark AI workload operation.

Affected VersionsENISA

DGX Spark 0 to 1.110.12

Affected Packages

euvd dgx_spark_0_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

NVIDIA DGX Spark is a compact AI supercomputer appliance whose system firmware underpins all higher-level software layers, including the host OS and any hypervisor or container runtime. CWE-787 (Out-of-Bounds Write) at the firmware level means an attacker with sufficient privilege can write data past the bounds of a firmware buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures that may control execution flow or security policy enforcement. Because firmware executes at a privilege level below the operating system (typically Ring -2 or equivalent in UEFI/BMC contexts), a successful exploit here can undermine trust in all software running above it. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:nvidia:dgx_spark:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* carries a wildcard version field, indicating all known versions of the DGX Spark firmware are considered affected per NVD records.

Know when Dgx Spark gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 8.2 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.2 HIGH

Firmware OOB write demands high local privilege (PR:H, AV:L); no user interaction; scope change justified because firmware compromise can affect the host OS layer above it.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA DGX Spark contains a vulnerability in the system firmware, where a privileged attacker could be able to cause an out-of-bounds write. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

NVIDIA DGX Spark deployments face a high-severity firmware vulnerability (CVE-2026-24262, CVSS 8.2) that could permit locally authenticated privileged users to compromise AI compute systems through privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the scope-changing flaw poses significant risk to organizations' critical infrastructure. Leadership should prioritize immediate access restrictions and monitoring while awaiting patches.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement strict local access controls limiting DGX Spark service access to essential administrators; apply network segmentation to prevent lateral movement from firmware compromise; deploy host-based intrusion detection for firmware anomalies and unexpected privilege escalation; maintain verified offline firmware backups; establish continuous monitoring of system logs for privilege changes and unauthorized code execution; maintain active coordination with NVIDIA for patch availability.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Specialized AI compute appliance, limited to ML/HPC datacenter deployments
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +41
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy