Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious Chrome extension
-
DeliverySocial-engineer user to install
-
ExploitSend crafted input over extension IPC
-
ExecutionTrigger input-validation flaw
-
PersistEscape extension sandbox
-
ImpactExecute in browser process context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to install a malicious, attacker-crafted Chrome extension - this user-interaction step (UI:R) is the primary limiting factor and is not a default condition. The malicious extension must then supply crafted input that Chrome's Extensions component fails to validate, triggering the sandbox escape. Limiting factors: the target must run a Chrome desktop build below 151.0.7922.72, must be persuaded to install the extension (blocked outright in environments enforcing an extension allowlist or Web Store-only policy), and no authentication to any service is needed but attacker code must execute inside the browser via the installed extension. There is no remote unauthenticated drive-by path against a default install without the extension-installation action. |
| Impact | The signals conflict sharply and should temper the headline number. NVD's 9.6 is driven by S:C plus C:H/I:H/A:H and PR:N, but PR:N is technically true only because Chrome imposes no in-app privilege - real exploitation still requires the victim to install a malicious extension (UI:R), a substantial social-engineering barrier. Chromium's own rating is Medium, EPSS is very low at 0.13% (3rd percentile), and CISA SSVC lists Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, all pointing to low likelihood of opportunistic, at-scale attacks. The one signal that agrees with high severity is SSVC Technical Impact: total, consistent with a full sandbox escape. Net: this is a legitimately serious code-execution-class bug but not an urgent internet-wide emergency - the 9.6 overstates real-world risk relative to the required user action and absence of exploitation. Patch on normal Chrome auto-update cadence rather than as an emergency out-of-band action, unless extension governance is weak in your environment. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker publishes or distributes a seemingly benign browser extension and, through phishing or a lure site, convinces a target to install it; once running, the extension sends crafted, improperly validated input across an extension API/IPC boundary to escape the sandbox and gain execution with the browser process's privileges. No public POC has been identified, and the required extension-install step makes this best suited to targeted rather than mass exploitation. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 03, 2026
Sandbox escape in Google Chrome desktop prior to 151.0.7922.72 allows an attacker who tricks a user into installing a malicious extension to break out of the renderer/extension sandbox via a crafted extension exploiting insufficient input validation. The flaw was reported internally by the Chrome team and carries an NVD CVSS of 9.6, though Chromium rates the security severity only Medium and SSVC shows no known exploitation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. A vendor patch is available, and exploitation hinges on the significant precondition of the victim installing an attacker-controlled extension.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: update Google Chrome to 151.0.7922.72 or later per the Chrome Stable channel advisory (https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html); confirm the update landed via chrome://settings/help and relaunch, since the fix only takes effect after restart. Because the attack requires a malicious extension, the highest-value compensating control is extension governance: enforce an enterprise ExtensionInstallAllowlist / ExtensionInstallBlocklist (set the blocklist to '*' and allowlist only vetted IDs) and disable installation of extensions from outside the Chrome Web Store, which prevents sideloaded or attacker-supplied CRX files at the cost of blocking unvetted productivity extensions users may want. Restricting extension installation to admins and enabling Chrome auto-update / keeping the browser current further reduces exposure; these controls have minimal side effects beyond added extension-approval overhead. Prioritize normal patch cadence given the low EPSS and no observed exploitation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability lives in Chrome's Extensions subsystem, which runs extension logic (background service workers, content scripts, and extension pages) inside a security sandbox intended to isolate untrusted extension code from the browser broker process and the host OS. The root cause is CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation): the extension IPC/API surface fails to sufficiently validate untrusted input supplied by a crafted extension, letting that input drive privileged code paths outside the sandbox boundary. A sandbox escape here means malicious extension-controlled code can influence the higher-privileged browser process, which is why NVD marks Scope as Changed (S:C). The single affected product per CPE is cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* across all desktop channels below the fixed build.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Delivery is network-borne but the attack hinges on the user installing a malicious extension (UI:R); no app privilege is needed (PR:N), and the sandbox escape changes scope (S:C) with full C/I/A loss.
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome versions prior to 151.0.7922.72 contain a critical sandbox escape vulnerability enabling code execution with user privileges. Exploitation requires social engineering-tricking users into installing a malicious extension-but successful attacks could compromise endpoint security entirely. Organizations must patch to reduce exposure despite the current low real-world exploitation probability.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Related Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Multiple Security Flaws
View all 80Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allSame technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-50699
GHSA-m2g4-4j4w-r7q3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB