Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS CVE-2026-8635

| EUVDEUVD-2026-45270 CRITICAL
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-07-17 ibm GHSA-xxqg-9cxv-cq9v
9.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privileged account
  2. Delivery
    Manipulate database to set superuser role
  3. Exploit
    Escalate to superuser context
  4. Execution
    Invoke code execution component
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary system commands
  6. Impact
    Full host compromise as service account

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated Langflow account (CVSS PR:L) with network reachability to the Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.0 web service (AV:N); no user interaction and low complexity are needed once that access is held. The concrete prerequisite from the description is the ability to directly manipulate the underlying database to set the superuser role, which then unlocks arbitrary system command execution. Limiting factors: the attacker cannot be fully anonymous (some valid credentials or account are required), so risk is highest in multi-tenant, shared, or internet-exposed instances and in deployments that allow open/self-service registration; single-user or network-isolated instances behind a VPN materially reduce exposure.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) is internally consistent with the description: network reachable, low complexity, requires low (authenticated) privileges, no user interaction, scope change, and full CHI impact - yielding a critical 9.9. The one real gating factor is PR:L: an attacker must already be an authenticated Langflow user, which limits blast radius to environments where accounts are provisioned to untrusted or lower-trust users, or where credentials can be obtained. There is no EPSS score, no KEV listing, and no POC in the provided data, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified - this is a high-severity, patch-now issue on impact grounds, but there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation yet. The scope change (S:C) and full-compromise outcome make it a genuine priority rather than an inflated score, particularly for multi-tenant or internet-exposed Langflow deployments.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds or obtains any low-privileged Langflow account authenticates to the platform, then directly manipulates the backing database to promote their account to superuser. With superuser role they invoke Langflow's code/command execution capability to run arbitrary system commands, gaining a shell with the Langflow service account's permissions and full control of the host. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and low attack complexity (AC:L) with no required user interaction makes the chain straightforward once authenticated.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 17, 2026

Privilege escalation to remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated user to elevate their account to superuser by directly manipulating the underlying database, then execute arbitrary system commands and achieve full compromise of the host running the Langflow service. The flaw (CWE-94, code injection) carries a critical CVSS 9.9 with a scope change, meaning code runs with the Langflow service account's permissions beyond the vulnerable component. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but a vendor patch is available.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the fixed release referenced in IBM's advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278925; the input does not include an exact fixed version number, so confirm the target build from that advisory before upgrading. As compensating controls until patched, restrict Langflow to trusted, authenticated users only and disable or tightly limit self-service account creation, since exploitation requires an authenticated (PR:L) account; place the application behind a VPN or network ACL rather than exposing it to the internet to shrink the AV:N attack surface; lock down direct access to the backing database so application-facing accounts cannot manipulate privilege/role tables; and run the Langflow service under a least-privileged, non-root service account to reduce the impact of the S:C scope change and command execution. Note the trade-offs: disabling open registration and restricting database access may break automated onboarding or integrations that rely on that access.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.10.0

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Langflow OSS is an open-source, Python-based low-code framework for visually building LLM/AI agent workflows, where flow components can execute code and system-level operations. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected application across versions 1.0.0-1.10.0. The root cause is classified as CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / code injection): an authenticated user can alter privilege state directly in the backing database to gain superuser role, and that elevated context permits arbitrary command execution - a classic broken-authorization-into-code-execution chain typical of workflow platforms that expose code-running components to privileged roles.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 9.9 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Network-reachable service exploitable by any authenticated user (PR:L), no interaction, and DB-manipulation-to-RCE breaks out of the app context (S:C) with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical flaw allowing authenticated users to elevate themselves to administrator level and run unrestricted commands on the server, resulting in complete system compromise. The risk is immediate for organizations using these versions-any internal user or attacker with stolen credentials can take over the entire infrastructure and access all data. A vendor patch is available and must be deployed immediately to all affected systems.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 79% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source LLM/agent-building framework, but not universally deployed enterprise software
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Very High

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

CVE-2026-9135 CRITICAL
9.9 Jul 17

Arbitrary Python code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 (Langflow versions up to 1.9.2) allows authenti

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy