Monthly
TuxGuitar versions before 2.1.0 will load and instantiate an attacker-supplied Java class contained in a crafted .tg tablature file, executing that class's constructor (and static initializer) with the privileges of the TuxGuitar process when the user opens the file. The document sets the gervil.soundbank.path property to an on-disk archive - the .tg file itself qualifies - whose META-INF/services/javax.sound.midi.Soundbank entry names a class bundled in that same archive, and the bundled Gervill media.sound.JARSoundbankReader loads it through an unverified URLClassLoader. The CVSS 4.0 vector is AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P with a score of 8.5 (unauthenticated, no non-default configuration required), but the payload must be delivered as a document the victim opens, so real-world priority is moderated by that delivery model; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is fixed in 2.1.0.
Remote code execution in the Theme-one The Grid WordPress plugin through version 2.8.1 allows network attackers to inject code or commands via the plugin's grid-generation code path, with the supplied CVSS:3.1 vector indicating AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N (unauthenticated and no user interaction per the vector, though the exact endpoint and authentication prerequisite should be verified in the Patchstack advisory). The provided vector rates this as 10.0 Critical with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, while our independent assessment adjusts scope from Changed to Unchanged but still considers impact High. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no KEV or EPSS data was provided.
Remote code execution in Markdown Preview Enhanced (a Visual Studio Code Markdown preview extension) before 0.8.29 lets a malicious repository run operating-system commands as the victim's account the moment the victim opens a Markdown file from that repository. The extension automatically evaluates repository-controlled .crossnote/config.js and .crossnote/parser.js files through vm.runInNewContext, and prototype-chain traversal escapes the Node.js host realm to reach the Function constructor and the process object - no further interaction and no module-scoped require are needed, and both the configuration-evaluation and parser-hook paths are affected. The vector requires local placement of the repository plus user interaction (opening the file), so it is not mass-exploitable over the network against a default install; there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The issue is fixed in Markdown Preview Enhanced 0.8.29, which bundles crossnote 0.9.30.
Arbitrary file access and operating-system command execution in Stirling-PDF prior to 2.13.2 are reachable by an authenticated administrator who uploads a crafted SQL file to POST /api/v1/database/import-database on instances running the default H2 database backend with security mode enabled. DatabaseService.validateSqlContent() splits the normalized input on semicolons and accepts a statement if it merely contains an allowed keyword, so dangerous H2 constructs such as FILE_READ, CSVWRITE and CREATE ALIAS slip past the whitelist and execute when RUNSCRIPT processes the import; the demonstrated chain writes attacker-controlled startup files to a user-site location and triggers the application's Python interpreter to load them, yielding command execution as the JVM service account. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects network reachability with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact and a scope change, but PR:H means the attacker must already hold administrative privileges and non-H2 deployments are unaffected; no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the issue is fixed in version 2.13.2.
Code injection in the VillaTheme Salevo WooCommerce plugin for WordPress (woo-boost-sales) affects all releases through 1.3.0 and lets a remote attacker reach a code-generation sink within the plugin, with the assessor's scoring indicating high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability. The underlying vulnerability class is CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code), and the Patchstack advisory tags the issue as potential remote code execution; there is no confirmed actively exploited status (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis. Exploitation requires the plugin to be installed and active on a WooCommerce site, which meaningfully narrows the realistic attack surface; the exact vulnerable function, endpoint or parameter is not disclosed, and the published CVSS vector (PR:N) conflicts with the assessor's vector (PR:L), so the precise authentication precondition is not fully resolved from available data.
Authenticated attackers holding high-privilege administrative access to the PAN-OS management interface can execute arbitrary code with root privileges on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). The underlying weakness is a code-injection flaw (CWE-94) in the management plane that is network-reachable with low attack complexity, but the realistic attacker population is narrow because CVSS PR:H requires the adversary to already possess an authenticated high-privilege session, and Palo Alto's recommended practice of limiting management access to trusted internal IP addresses largely neutralizes the exposure. Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access are explicitly not impacted, and no CISA KEV entry or public exploit code is identified in the available data at time of analysis.
Code injection in the VillaTheme 'Email Template Customizer for WooCommerce' WordPress plugin, affecting versions up to and including 1.3.4, lets an attacker influence the content/code generated by the plugin's email template handling, carrying a high confidentiality impact (C:H) with low integrity impact in our assessment. The supplied advisory vector claims unauthenticated, no-interaction exploitation (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, 7.5), but our independent assessment revises this to PR:L (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N), meaning a privilege prerequisite cannot be ruled out and the unauthenticated claim is unverified. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV entry were identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied; exposure is limited to WordPress sites running WooCommerce with this specific plugin active.
Remote code execution in the affiliate-toolkit WordPress plugin (versions before 3.9.1) lets an authenticated user holding the Contributor role or higher submit a template body that the plugin's bundled templating engine compiles and runs as PHP, giving full server-side code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Any WordPress site running an affected version is exposed, and because Contributors are unprivileged content authors, sites with open author self-registration or large multi-author teams carry the greatest practical risk; no end-user interaction is required. Publicly available exploit code exists (documented via WPScan) and the EPSS score is low at roughly 0.18% (8th percentile), with no indication of confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) and no SSVC exploitation signal, so this rates as a moderate-but-real priority for sites that actually run the plugin.
Code injection in TeamPlus Messenger allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trick a user into interacting with crafted content, injecting and executing arbitrary JavaScript; after the user confirms a Windows security warning, arbitrary code executes with the victim's privileges. The CVSS 4.0 vector scores 8.6 (High) with UI:A, gated by two distinct user actions: interacting with the malicious content and then accepting an OS-level security prompt. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in TeamPlus Messenger for Windows lets an unauthenticated attacker deliver a crafted link that injects and executes arbitrary JavaScript inside the client, escalating to native code execution with the privileges of the logged-in user once the victim opens the link and confirms a Windows security warning dialog. Rated CVSS 4.0 base 8.6 (High) and mapped to CWE-94, the flaw's practical severity is gated by two mandatory victim actions - following the malicious link and accepting the Windows prompt - so only users who both act are compromised, and execution is confined to user-level privileges rather than SYSTEM or administrative rights. At the time of analysis no public exploit code was identified and the issue was not listed in CISA KEV; only TWCERT/CC advisory references are available, and no vendor patched version is specified in the provided data.
TuxGuitar versions before 2.1.0 will load and instantiate an attacker-supplied Java class contained in a crafted .tg tablature file, executing that class's constructor (and static initializer) with the privileges of the TuxGuitar process when the user opens the file. The document sets the gervil.soundbank.path property to an on-disk archive - the .tg file itself qualifies - whose META-INF/services/javax.sound.midi.Soundbank entry names a class bundled in that same archive, and the bundled Gervill media.sound.JARSoundbankReader loads it through an unverified URLClassLoader. The CVSS 4.0 vector is AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P with a score of 8.5 (unauthenticated, no non-default configuration required), but the payload must be delivered as a document the victim opens, so real-world priority is moderated by that delivery model; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is fixed in 2.1.0.
Remote code execution in the Theme-one The Grid WordPress plugin through version 2.8.1 allows network attackers to inject code or commands via the plugin's grid-generation code path, with the supplied CVSS:3.1 vector indicating AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N (unauthenticated and no user interaction per the vector, though the exact endpoint and authentication prerequisite should be verified in the Patchstack advisory). The provided vector rates this as 10.0 Critical with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, while our independent assessment adjusts scope from Changed to Unchanged but still considers impact High. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no KEV or EPSS data was provided.
Remote code execution in Markdown Preview Enhanced (a Visual Studio Code Markdown preview extension) before 0.8.29 lets a malicious repository run operating-system commands as the victim's account the moment the victim opens a Markdown file from that repository. The extension automatically evaluates repository-controlled .crossnote/config.js and .crossnote/parser.js files through vm.runInNewContext, and prototype-chain traversal escapes the Node.js host realm to reach the Function constructor and the process object - no further interaction and no module-scoped require are needed, and both the configuration-evaluation and parser-hook paths are affected. The vector requires local placement of the repository plus user interaction (opening the file), so it is not mass-exploitable over the network against a default install; there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The issue is fixed in Markdown Preview Enhanced 0.8.29, which bundles crossnote 0.9.30.
Arbitrary file access and operating-system command execution in Stirling-PDF prior to 2.13.2 are reachable by an authenticated administrator who uploads a crafted SQL file to POST /api/v1/database/import-database on instances running the default H2 database backend with security mode enabled. DatabaseService.validateSqlContent() splits the normalized input on semicolons and accepts a statement if it merely contains an allowed keyword, so dangerous H2 constructs such as FILE_READ, CSVWRITE and CREATE ALIAS slip past the whitelist and execute when RUNSCRIPT processes the import; the demonstrated chain writes attacker-controlled startup files to a user-site location and triggers the application's Python interpreter to load them, yielding command execution as the JVM service account. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects network reachability with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact and a scope change, but PR:H means the attacker must already hold administrative privileges and non-H2 deployments are unaffected; no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the issue is fixed in version 2.13.2.
Code injection in the VillaTheme Salevo WooCommerce plugin for WordPress (woo-boost-sales) affects all releases through 1.3.0 and lets a remote attacker reach a code-generation sink within the plugin, with the assessor's scoring indicating high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability. The underlying vulnerability class is CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code), and the Patchstack advisory tags the issue as potential remote code execution; there is no confirmed actively exploited status (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis. Exploitation requires the plugin to be installed and active on a WooCommerce site, which meaningfully narrows the realistic attack surface; the exact vulnerable function, endpoint or parameter is not disclosed, and the published CVSS vector (PR:N) conflicts with the assessor's vector (PR:L), so the precise authentication precondition is not fully resolved from available data.
Authenticated attackers holding high-privilege administrative access to the PAN-OS management interface can execute arbitrary code with root privileges on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). The underlying weakness is a code-injection flaw (CWE-94) in the management plane that is network-reachable with low attack complexity, but the realistic attacker population is narrow because CVSS PR:H requires the adversary to already possess an authenticated high-privilege session, and Palo Alto's recommended practice of limiting management access to trusted internal IP addresses largely neutralizes the exposure. Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access are explicitly not impacted, and no CISA KEV entry or public exploit code is identified in the available data at time of analysis.
Code injection in the VillaTheme 'Email Template Customizer for WooCommerce' WordPress plugin, affecting versions up to and including 1.3.4, lets an attacker influence the content/code generated by the plugin's email template handling, carrying a high confidentiality impact (C:H) with low integrity impact in our assessment. The supplied advisory vector claims unauthenticated, no-interaction exploitation (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, 7.5), but our independent assessment revises this to PR:L (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N), meaning a privilege prerequisite cannot be ruled out and the unauthenticated claim is unverified. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV entry were identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied; exposure is limited to WordPress sites running WooCommerce with this specific plugin active.
Remote code execution in the affiliate-toolkit WordPress plugin (versions before 3.9.1) lets an authenticated user holding the Contributor role or higher submit a template body that the plugin's bundled templating engine compiles and runs as PHP, giving full server-side code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Any WordPress site running an affected version is exposed, and because Contributors are unprivileged content authors, sites with open author self-registration or large multi-author teams carry the greatest practical risk; no end-user interaction is required. Publicly available exploit code exists (documented via WPScan) and the EPSS score is low at roughly 0.18% (8th percentile), with no indication of confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) and no SSVC exploitation signal, so this rates as a moderate-but-real priority for sites that actually run the plugin.
Code injection in TeamPlus Messenger allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trick a user into interacting with crafted content, injecting and executing arbitrary JavaScript; after the user confirms a Windows security warning, arbitrary code executes with the victim's privileges. The CVSS 4.0 vector scores 8.6 (High) with UI:A, gated by two distinct user actions: interacting with the malicious content and then accepting an OS-level security prompt. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
Remote code execution in TeamPlus Messenger for Windows lets an unauthenticated attacker deliver a crafted link that injects and executes arbitrary JavaScript inside the client, escalating to native code execution with the privileges of the logged-in user once the victim opens the link and confirms a Windows security warning dialog. Rated CVSS 4.0 base 8.6 (High) and mapped to CWE-94, the flaw's practical severity is gated by two mandatory victim actions - following the malicious link and accepting the Windows prompt - so only users who both act are compromised, and execution is confined to user-level privileges rather than SYSTEM or administrative rights. At the time of analysis no public exploit code was identified and the issue was not listed in CISA KEV; only TWCERT/CC advisory references are available, and no vendor patched version is specified in the provided data.