Monthly
Arbitrary code execution in PraisonAI (praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 lets an attacker who can drop a Python file into a plugin directory run their own code. The plugin manager auto-discovers and executes any .py file found in project-level or user-home .praisonai/plugins/ directories at initialization, with no code signing, integrity checks, or sandboxing. VulnCheck reported it under CWE-94; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in PraisonAI before 4.6.78 lets attackers who control deployment configuration achieve arbitrary Python execution because the API-server deployment generator fails to safely encode the deploy.api.host and agents_file values before emitting them into generated Python source (CWE-94). Injected expressions run when the generated API server starts or handles requests, yielding full code execution in the server process. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis; the flaw was reported by VulnCheck and a vendor patch is available.
Stored server-side template injection in Grav's bundled Flex Objects plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-flex-objects) before 1.4.0 lets a low-privileged content author inject Twig code through the dynamic collection/object title frontmatter, which is passed unsanitized to template_from_string() and executed. Because the title path bypasses Grav's Security::cleanDangerousTwig() filter, an attacker can reach internal Grav services such as the scheduler and escalate arbitrary Twig evaluation to full remote command execution. Reported by VulnCheck with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 (High); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
jadx is a Dex to Java decompiler. Prior to 1.5.6, jadx inserts the android:versionName value from an AndroidManifest into the generated app/build.gradle Groovy template without proper sanitization when exporting a decompiled APK as an Android Gradle project. A malicious APK can break out of the string context so that opening or building the exported Gradle project executes attacker-controlled Groovy code on the victim machine. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.6.
Remote code execution in Aetopia Digital Asset Management (DAM) v1.0.0 is achievable through a server-side template injection flaw: attacker-controlled input in the 'name' and 'description' parameters of the Add/Update Project function is evaluated by the server-side template engine, letting an attacker run arbitrary code on the host. NVD scores this CVSS 9.8 (network, low complexity, no privileges required), and a public researcher writeup detailing the SSTI exists on the eslam3kl GitBook; however, there is no public exploit identified as weaponized code and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so it is not confirmed as actively exploited. Note the CVSS PR:N rating conflicts with the fact that Add/Update Project is normally an authenticated application feature.
Code injection (CWE-94) in Adobe ColdFusion 2023 (Update 21 and earlier) and ColdFusion 2025 (Update 10 and earlier) allows a low-privileged, network-adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user without any user interaction. Because the CVSS scope is changed, successful exploitation can extend impact beyond the vulnerable component to the underlying host. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the EPSS probability is low (0.43%, 35th percentile), but the near-maximum CVSS of 9.9 and Adobe's own PSIRT reporting make this a high-priority patch.
Post-authentication improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker as administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Local privilege elevation in Microsoft .NET Framework (and .NET 8.0/9.0 plus Visual Studio 2022/2026) via code injection (CWE-94) that lets an unauthorized attacker run code with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact after a victim is tricked into interacting with attacker-supplied content. Microsoft reported the issue and has shipped a patch; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation requires local access and user interaction (UI:R), which meaningfully limits mass-exploitation despite the high 7.8 CVSS score.
Incorrect equality comparison in CedarJava (cedar-java) versions before 4.9.0 causes EntityIdentifier.equals() to return true when comparing against null and false when comparing an object to itself, due to inverted null/self-reference branches. Cedar's actual authorization decisions are unaffected because they are computed in Rust from JSON, but integrators who call equals() on entity identifiers in their own Java logic may make incorrect trust or access decisions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issue is fixed in 4.9.0.
Remote code execution in the ServiceNow AI Platform allows an unauthenticated attacker, under certain (unspecified) circumstances, to execute arbitrary code within the ServiceNow platform, carrying a critical CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.5. ServiceNow has patched hosted instances directly and issued fixes to self-hosted customers and partners; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vendor states it is not currently aware of exploitation. The high CVSS complexity metric (AC:H) indicates the exploit is not trivially reproducible against arbitrary instances, tempering the otherwise maximal impact rating.
Arbitrary code execution in PraisonAI (praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 lets an attacker who can drop a Python file into a plugin directory run their own code. The plugin manager auto-discovers and executes any .py file found in project-level or user-home .praisonai/plugins/ directories at initialization, with no code signing, integrity checks, or sandboxing. VulnCheck reported it under CWE-94; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
Code injection in PraisonAI before 4.6.78 lets attackers who control deployment configuration achieve arbitrary Python execution because the API-server deployment generator fails to safely encode the deploy.api.host and agents_file values before emitting them into generated Python source (CWE-94). Injected expressions run when the generated API server starts or handles requests, yielding full code execution in the server process. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis; the flaw was reported by VulnCheck and a vendor patch is available.
Stored server-side template injection in Grav's bundled Flex Objects plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-flex-objects) before 1.4.0 lets a low-privileged content author inject Twig code through the dynamic collection/object title frontmatter, which is passed unsanitized to template_from_string() and executed. Because the title path bypasses Grav's Security::cleanDangerousTwig() filter, an attacker can reach internal Grav services such as the scheduler and escalate arbitrary Twig evaluation to full remote command execution. Reported by VulnCheck with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 (High); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
jadx is a Dex to Java decompiler. Prior to 1.5.6, jadx inserts the android:versionName value from an AndroidManifest into the generated app/build.gradle Groovy template without proper sanitization when exporting a decompiled APK as an Android Gradle project. A malicious APK can break out of the string context so that opening or building the exported Gradle project executes attacker-controlled Groovy code on the victim machine. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.6.
Remote code execution in Aetopia Digital Asset Management (DAM) v1.0.0 is achievable through a server-side template injection flaw: attacker-controlled input in the 'name' and 'description' parameters of the Add/Update Project function is evaluated by the server-side template engine, letting an attacker run arbitrary code on the host. NVD scores this CVSS 9.8 (network, low complexity, no privileges required), and a public researcher writeup detailing the SSTI exists on the eslam3kl GitBook; however, there is no public exploit identified as weaponized code and it is not listed in CISA KEV, so it is not confirmed as actively exploited. Note the CVSS PR:N rating conflicts with the fact that Add/Update Project is normally an authenticated application feature.
Code injection (CWE-94) in Adobe ColdFusion 2023 (Update 21 and earlier) and ColdFusion 2025 (Update 10 and earlier) allows a low-privileged, network-adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user without any user interaction. Because the CVSS scope is changed, successful exploitation can extend impact beyond the vulnerable component to the underlying host. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the EPSS probability is low (0.43%, 35th percentile), but the near-maximum CVSS of 9.9 and Adobe's own PSIRT reporting make this a high-priority patch.
Post-authentication improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker as administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Local privilege elevation in Microsoft .NET Framework (and .NET 8.0/9.0 plus Visual Studio 2022/2026) via code injection (CWE-94) that lets an unauthorized attacker run code with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact after a victim is tricked into interacting with attacker-supplied content. Microsoft reported the issue and has shipped a patch; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV. Exploitation requires local access and user interaction (UI:R), which meaningfully limits mass-exploitation despite the high 7.8 CVSS score.
Incorrect equality comparison in CedarJava (cedar-java) versions before 4.9.0 causes EntityIdentifier.equals() to return true when comparing against null and false when comparing an object to itself, due to inverted null/self-reference branches. Cedar's actual authorization decisions are unaffected because they are computed in Rust from JSON, but integrators who call equals() on entity identifiers in their own Java logic may make incorrect trust or access decisions. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issue is fixed in 4.9.0.
Remote code execution in the ServiceNow AI Platform allows an unauthenticated attacker, under certain (unspecified) circumstances, to execute arbitrary code within the ServiceNow platform, carrying a critical CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.5. ServiceNow has patched hosted instances directly and issued fixes to self-hosted customers and partners; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the vendor states it is not currently aware of exploitation. The high CVSS complexity metric (AC:H) indicates the exploit is not trivially reproducible against arbitrary instances, tempering the otherwise maximal impact rating.