IBM Langflow
CVE-2026-8859
CRITICAL
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
AC:H because Save-to-File must be enabled and the victim flow must hit an attacker-controlled server; PR:L for flow-author access; C:L since a write primitive yields only indirect confidentiality; I:H/A:H for arbitrary write and S:C for host-level reach.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest component. A path traversal vulnerability exists when the "Save to File" feature is enabled, where filenames extracted from HTTP response Content-Disposition headers are not sanitized before being joined to the temporary directory path. An attacker controlling an external HTTP server can supply crafted filename values containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../), enabling arbitrary file writes to locations accessible by the Langflow process.
AnalysisAI
Arbitrary file write in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an attacker who controls an external HTTP server plant files at attacker-chosen paths on the Langflow host. The flaw lives in the APIRequest component's 'Save to File' feature, which trusts filenames from a response Content-Disposition header without sanitizing path traversal sequences, so a malicious server response can escape the temporary directory and write to any location the Langflow process can reach. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires the APIRequest component's 'Save to File' feature to be explicitly enabled (a non-default setting), and a Langflow flow that issues an HTTP request to a server the attacker controls or can poison - the attacker must sit on that upstream endpoint to inject a malicious Content-Disposition filename containing '../' sequences. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | IBM's CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 9.9) reflects a network-reachable, low-privilege, scope-changing file write with full CIA impact - an arbitrary write primitive that commonly escalates to remote code execution by overwriting code, startup scripts, or configuration. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker stands up (or compromises) an HTTP endpoint that a Langflow flow's APIRequest component is configured to call with 'Save to File' enabled. When the flow fetches the URL, the attacker's response includes a Content-Disposition header such as filename="../../app/startup.py", causing Langflow to write attacker-supplied content outside the temp directory and potentially achieve code execution on the next process load. … |
| Remediation | Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the fixed IBM Langflow OSS release referenced at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278924 (exact fixed version not stated in the provided data; confirm the target version in the advisory before upgrading and do not assume a version number). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours, audit all deployments of Langflow 1.0.0-1.10.0 across your infrastructure and identify systems requiring immediate updates. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
More in Langflow Oss
View allUnauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom
Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary code by planting a mali
Authenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any logged-in user run arbitrary Pytho
Privilege escalation to remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated user to e
Arbitrary Python code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 (Langflow versions up to 1.9.2) allows authenti
Insecure deserialization (CWE-502) in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any party with access to the b
Arbitrary code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to run code on the ho
Authorization bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access protected
Improper authorization enforcement in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 lets unauthenticated remote attackers reach p
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 stems from broken webhook authentication
Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l
Same weakness CWE-22 – Path Traversal
View allSame technique Path Traversal
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today