Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-priv local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Open vulnerable kernel-mode driver interface
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted request triggering OOB write
  4. Execution
    Corrupt adjacent kernel memory
  5. Persist
    Execute code in kernel context
  6. Impact
    Escalate to SYSTEM/root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access to a system with the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (or Virtual GPU Manager) installed and the attacker already holding low-level privileges (PR:L) - e.g., an authenticated local user, a compromised low-privileged process, or code running inside a sandbox with driver access. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and the flaw is reachable against default driver installations across the affected GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, Tesla, and vGPU product lines on both Windows and Linux. The principal limiting factor is that exploitation is not remote: the attacker must first obtain code execution on the target host, and successful escalation requires developing a reliable kernel memory-corruption exploit; it cannot be triggered over the network or by a purely remote unauthenticated actor.

Impact

This is a locally-exploitable kernel-mode out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver, with a vendor/NVD CVSS 3.1 vector of AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.8, High). The signals are internally consistent: local attack vector, low complexity, and only low privileges required (an existing local user or sandboxed process), with no user interaction - a textbook local privilege-escalation primitive where a memory-corruption bug in a kernel driver yields SYSTEM/root. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the supplied data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; exploitation would currently require an attacker to develop a working kernel exploit, which is non-trivial. Real-world priority is moderate-to-high rather than emergency: the local-only vector means it is not remotely wormable and is not an initial-access bug, but on the enormous installed base of NVIDIA drivers it is a valuable second-stage escalation and sandbox-escape tool, so it should be patched on a standard prioritized cadence. No key signals conflict - the CVSS local vector matches the 'kernel mode layer' description; the main gap is the absence of exploitability telemetry (EPSS/KEV/POC all missing), so risk is inferred from the impact profile rather than observed exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows or Linux host with NVIDIA drivers installed (e.g., a standard user, a compromised service account, or code escaped into a restricted sandbox) issues crafted requests/ioctls to the vulnerable kernel-mode driver interface to trigger the out-of-bounds write. By shaping adjacent kernel memory, they corrupt kernel structures to execute code at the kernel privilege level, escalating to SYSTEM/root or crashing the system for denial of service. No public exploit code is identified in the available data, so weaponization would require custom kernel-exploit development.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

A locally-triggered out-of-bounds write in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver kernel-mode layer lets an attacker who already holds low-level privileges on a Windows or Linux host corrupt kernel memory, with the potential for code execution in kernel context, escalation of privileges, denial of service, information disclosure and data tampering. The affected driver ships by default across the GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, Tesla and Virtual GPU Manager product lines, so any host with a current NVIDIA driver installed is in scope, but exploitation is not remote: an attacker must first obtain code execution on the target (an authenticated local user, a compromised low-privileged process, or sandboxed code with driver access) and then develop a reliable kernel corruption exploit. CVE-2026-47548 carries a vendor/NVD CVSS 3.1 vector of AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.8, High); no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to update the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver to the patched release named in the vendor advisory; the provided intelligence does not specify an exact fixed driver version, so consult the NVIDIA product-security advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 (mirrored at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47548) and apply the corresponding Windows/Linux driver branch for each affected line - GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, Tesla and the Virtual GPU Manager - noting that vGPU hosts require the matching host driver plus a guest-driver update and typically a maintenance window. Until patched, treat this as a privilege-escalation hardening problem rather than a network exposure: because exploitation requires pre-existing local low-level access (PR:L, AV:L), the effective compensating controls are to minimize who and what can reach the GPU device interface. Restrict local logon and interactive access on multi-tenant or shared GPU hosts, remove unnecessary local accounts, and confine untrusted workloads (browsers, containers, sandboxed CI jobs) away from direct access to /dev/nvidia* devices on Linux or the NVIDIA device objects on Windows, since a sandbox that can open the driver is inside the exploit surface; the trade-off is reduced functionality for GPU-accelerated applications that genuinely need direct driver access. Where GPU passthrough or vGPU is used, isolate tenants so a guest cannot escalate onto the host, and consider temporarily withholding GPU passthrough from untrusted guest VMs. On Windows, enable Hypervisor-Protected Code Integrity and, where feasible, Memory Integrity/VBS to raise the bar for kernel payload execution, accepting the driver-compatibility and performance overhead this introduces. Monitor for unexpected driver crashes, bugchecks or repeated GPU device open attempts from non-graphics processes as possible exploitation telemetry, and re-verify patch status against the vendor bulletin rather than assuming the absence of a published version number means no fix is available.

Affected VersionsENISA

Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Virtual GPU Manager 580.159.01(All versions prior to and including vGPU 19.5)
Virtual GPU Manager 582.51(All versions prior to and including vGPU 19.5)
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
Virtual GPU Manager 596.38(All versions prior to and including vGPU 20.1)
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
Virtual GPU Manager 595.71.03(All versions prior to and including vGPU 20.1)
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is classified as CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) and resides in the kernel mode layer of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver, the privileged component that services requests from user-mode graphics and compute clients through its device interface. Because the driver runs in ring 0, a write past the end of an allocated kernel buffer can be shaped into arbitrary memory corruption, which is why the integrity and confidentiality impacts are both rated High in a single vulnerable component (S:U). The assessed vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H: the attack is local (AV:L), requires the attacker to already possess low-level privileges such as an authenticated user or compromised process (PR:L), needs no user interaction (UI:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L) once that access is obtained. CPE data enumerates nvidia:geforce, nvidia:rtx,_quadro,_nvs and nvidia:tesla with wildcard version ranges, indicating the affected population spans consumer GeForce, professional RTX/Quadro/NVS, datacenter Tesla and the Virtual GPU Manager (vGPU) hypervisor-side component, on both Windows and Linux. The limiting factor is not network reachability - the driver interface is local - but the difficulty of turning a driver-level out-of-bounds write into a reliable, non-crashing exploit.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Kernel-mode OOB write reachable by a low-privileged local user with no interaction yields full code execution, so AV:L/PR:L/UI:N with C:H/I:H/A:H, scope unchanged within the OS.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE HIGH
Red Hat 7.8 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an attacker could cause an out-of-bounds write. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity flaw in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver kernel-mode component affects the GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, Tesla, and Virtual GPU Manager product lines shipped by default on Windows and Linux hosts, allowing an attacker who already holds low-level access on a machine to corrupt kernel memory and potentially seize full control of the operating system. Because NVIDIA drivers are pervasive across engineering workstations, virtual desktop infrastructure, AI/ML compute nodes, and laptops, the exposure footprint spans a large share of the estate. No vendor patch is currently available and no public exploit has been identified, so leadership should treat this as a managed risk requiring interim hardening and close vendor monitoring rather than an immediate emergency, while recognizing that any host where a low-privileged user or compromised process can reach the driver is a candidate for full system compromise.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary local administrative rights; restrict which users and processes can interact with the NVIDIA GPU driver on shared, VDI/vGPU, and multi-tenant hosts; apply application allowlisting and sandboxing to constrain untrusted code; monitor kernel and driver activity with EDR for privilege-escalation or memory-corruption indicators; and segment or isolate high-value GPU compute systems until a vendor fix is available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 93% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GPU drivers span consumer GeForce, RTX/Quadro workstation, and Tesla/vGPU datacenter fleets
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy