Skip to main content

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor CVE-2026-16661

| EUVDEUVD-2026-62730 HIGH
Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190)
2026-08-19 ibm GHSA-xx9m-vc9m-c7wp
8.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain service-level FSP credentials
  2. Delivery
    Connect to FSP management interface
  3. Exploit
    Craft malicious mailbox message
  4. Execution
    Trigger integer overflow in mailbox handler
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary code in host firmware runtime
  6. Impact
    Achieve full control of managed Power system

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer overflow checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires authenticated service-level access to the IBM Flexible Service Processor (FSP) - a privileged management credential tier above standard HMC administrator access, typically held by IBM hardware support engineers or automation systems with explicit service-level authorization. The attack is directed at the service processor mailbox interface specifically, meaning the attacker must be able to submit mailbox messages to the FSP, which requires either physical console access, FSP Ethernet port connectivity, or access via an HMC with service-level credentials. The CVSS AV:L reflects that FSP access is logically local to the management plane rather than directly internet-exposed. Exploitation is limited by: (1) requirement for PR:H service-level FSP credentials (not standard admin), (2) FSP network ports typically isolated on a dedicated management VLAN, (3) no user interaction vector means no phishing-based delivery, and (4) only specific firmware versions in streams FW950, FW1060, FW1110, and FW1120 are affected. Systems running firmware outside these affected ranges or already patched to the fixed levels are not vulnerable.

Impact

The CVSS 8.2 score reflects the high impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) and scope change but is partially moderated by the local attack vector (AV:L) and high privilege requirement (PR:H). In practice, service-level FSP access is typically restricted to hardware administrators, IBM support engineers, and automated management platforms - this is not a broadly accessible attack surface. That said, in environments where FSP network management ports (dedicated 1GbE FSP ports) are accessible from internal networks without strong segmentation, the 'local' attack vector is effectively network-reachable by any internal actor who can authenticate at the service level. No EPSS data was provided; given the specialized access requirements and enterprise-only deployment footprint, opportunistic mass exploitation is unlikely, but targeted attacks by a compromised privileged insider or via a compromised management network represent a credible threat. The absence of CISA KEV listing and no confirmed POC lowers urgency compared to KEV-listed firmware vulnerabilities (e.g., BMC flaws in Baseboard Management Controllers). The primary risk is targeted: a threat actor who already has foothold in the management network and service-level credentials could use this to achieve persistent, firmware-level control below the OS - extremely difficult to detect and remediate. SSVC assessment: exploitation status is 'none publicly known'; automatable is 'no' (requires authenticated privileged access); technical impact is 'total' (full system compromise). SSVC priority is likely 'scheduled' patching rather than immediate emergency response for most organizations.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained service-level credentials for the FSP - either through credential theft, insider access, or compromise of an IBM Hardware Management Console (HMC) - connects to the service processor management interface and sends a crafted mailbox message designed to trigger an integer overflow in the firmware's mailbox-handling routine. The overflow corrupts firmware memory or redirects execution flow, granting the attacker arbitrary code execution within the host firmware runtime, from which they can manipulate partition configurations, disable security controls, or install persistent firmware-level implants that survive OS reinstallation. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Remote code execution in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor firmware versions FW950 through FW1120 allows an attacker with authenticated service-level access to the Flexible Service Processor (FSP) to execute arbitrary code in the host firmware runtime and gain full control of the managed Power system. An integer overflow (CWE-190) in the service processor mailbox interface is the root cause, with CVSS scope change (S:C) reflecting that exploitation breaks out from the FSP boundary into the broader host firmware and managed-system context. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis; however, the combination of complete C/I/A impact and scope change makes this a high-priority patch target for any organization running affected IBM Power hardware.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-released firmware patch per the IBM advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283237, which provides specific target fix levels for each affected firmware stream (FW950, FW1060, FW1110, FW1120). The advisory should be consulted for the exact patched firmware identifiers, as IBM designates fix levels by stream. While awaiting patching, compensating controls include strictly restricting network access to FSP management ports (dedicated FSP Ethernet and HMC communication paths) via firewall rules and VLAN isolation - this limits the attack surface to only physically present or VPN-authenticated administrators. Disabling or revoking service-level FSP accounts for non-essential personnel reduces the pool of potential attackers. Organizations should audit who holds service-level FSP credentials and rotate those credentials as a precaution. Note that firmware patching on IBM Power Systems requires a system IPL (Initial Program Load / reboot) and coordinated maintenance windows, which may require scheduling for high-availability environments.

Affected VersionsENISA

PowerVM Hypervisor FW1060.00 ≤FW1060.80
PowerVM Hypervisor FW950.00 ≤FW950.H2
PowerVM Hypervisor FW1110.00 ≤FW1110.30
PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM PowerVM is the Type-1 hypervisor running on IBM POWER processor-based servers (POWER9, POWER10). The Flexible Service Processor (FSP) is a dedicated service processor embedded in IBM Power Systems hardware that provides out-of-band management, firmware updates, and system monitoring - functionally analogous to BMC/iLO/iDRAC on x86 platforms but deeply integrated with PowerVM. The vulnerability resides in the service processor mailbox interface, which is the inter-component communication channel between the FSP and the host partition firmware. CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound) indicates that an attacker can craft mailbox messages that trigger arithmetic overflow in the firmware's message-handling logic, corrupting memory or control flow to achieve code execution within the host firmware runtime environment. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:powervm_hypervisor covering firmware streams FW950, FW1060, FW1110, and FW1120. Because the exploit crosses from the FSP's management domain into the host firmware runtime, the CVSS scope change (S:C) is accurate and correctly reflects privilege escalation across a security boundary.

Know when Powervm Hypervisor gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.2 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.2 HIGH

AV:L and PR:H confirmed by FSP service-level access requirement; S:C reflects firmware-to-host-runtime boundary crossing with full C/I/A impact on managed system.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can exploit this vulnerability, allowing arbitrary code to be executed in the host firmware runtime, giving full control over the managed system, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor firmware versions FW950-FW1120 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability allowing authenticated attackers to seize complete control of Power virtualization infrastructure. This directly compromises the availability and integrity of any systems relying on affected hardware platforms. Patching all impacted firmware is required to prevent loss of operational control over critical compute resources.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 97% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise hypervisor limited to IBM Power Systems hardware
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +41
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2022-34331 CRITICAL
9.8 Nov 11

After performing a sequence of Power FW950, FW1010 maintenance operations a SRIOV network adapter can be improperly conf

CVE-2021-38917 CRITICAL
9.1 Dec 10

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW860, FW940, and FW950 could allow an attacker that gains service access to the FSP can read and

CVE-2026-18821 HIGH
8.8 Aug 19

Remote code execution in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor partition firmware exposes Power Systems environments during network boo

CVE-2026-17414 HIGH
8.8 Aug 19

Network boot exploitation in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across firmware branches FW950, FW1060, FW1110, and FW1120 allows an

CVE-2023-30438 HIGH
8.8 May 17

An internally discovered vulnerability in PowerVM on IBM Power9 and Power10 systems could allow an attacker with privile

CVE-2026-17091 HIGH
8.4 Aug 19

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across four firmware trains (FW950 through FW1120) exposes an integer overflow (CWE-190) in its h

CVE-2026-11885 HIGH
8.4 Jul 30

OS memory integrity compromise and hypervisor denial of service in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor (firmware FW950, FW1060, and F

CVE-2023-30440 HIGH
7.9 May 23

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW860.00 through FW860.B3, FW950.00 through FW950.70, FW1010.00 through FW1010.50, FW1020.00 thro

CVE-2023-25683 HIGH
7.5 Jun 15

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW950.00 through FW950.71, FW1010.00 through FW1010.40, FW1020.00 through FW1020.20, and FW1030.0

CVE-2026-18871 HIGH
7.3 Aug 19

Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor's host firmware configuration parsing allows authenticated service

CVE-2026-17097 MEDIUM
6.7 Aug 19

IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across firmware branches FW950 through FW1120 exposes a flaw in the hypervisor call (hcall) inter

CVE-2026-17028 MEDIUM
6.5 Aug 19

Partition firmware in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across firmware streams FW950 through FW1120 is vulnerable to a denial-of-s

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy