Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain root access in guest partition
-
DeliveryCraft malformed hypervisor call with invalid array index
-
ExploitSubmit hcall to PowerVM hypervisor interface
-
ExecutionTrigger improper index validation in hypervisor
-
PersistPermanently freeze virtual processor
-
ImpactForce platform-wide re-IPL affecting all guests
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Array index validation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires root (superuser) access to a guest partition running on a vulnerable IBM PowerVM firmware version (FW950.00 through FW950.H2, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, or FW1120.00). The attack is local to the guest partition (AV:L); the attacker cannot exploit this remotely without first compromising root on the guest. No special non-default configuration is required - the hypervisor call interface is a standard facility available to all guest partitions. The primary limiting factor is the requirement for guest root privilege, which constrains exploitation to authorized administrators or attackers who have already achieved full guest compromise. The attacker has no control over the location of any injected data in memory, limiting the utility of the integrity sub-impact for further exploitation. |
| Impact | The CVSS 7.3 score with AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H conveys a meaningful real-world risk in multi-tenant POWER environments, particularly where guest partitions are administered by parties distinct from the platform operator. The Availability:High rating is well-justified - a full platform re-IPL is a severe recovery action that disrupts all guests simultaneously, not just the attacker's partition. IBM's assigned PR:L merits scrutiny: the description explicitly requires root access to the guest partition, which aligns more closely with PR:H by conventional CVSS 3.1 interpretation, though IBM may be scoring from the hypervisor's trust boundary perspective, where any guest is inherently 'low privilege.' The Integrity:Low rating reflects the uncontrolled data injection scenario - while concerning architecturally, the absence of attacker control over the target memory location substantially limits exploitation of this sub-impact. No EPSS data is available for this CVE, and it is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, suggesting no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. In practice, risk is highest in shared infrastructure or cloud-like POWER environments; in single-tenant deployments where guest root and platform ownership align, the risk is significantly reduced to a privilege-escalation-adjacent concern. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A system administrator or attacker who has gained root access to a guest partition on a vulnerable IBM POWER system constructs a malformed hypervisor call with an out-of-bounds array index, triggering the CWE-129 flaw in the hcall handler. The hypervisor's improper validation causes an internal state corruption that permanently stalls the associated virtual processor, and the platform operator is forced to perform a full system re-IPL - taking all other co-resident guest partitions offline in the process. In some invocations of this scenario, the corruption pathway may also write a small amount of uncontrolled data into hypervisor or partition memory, though the attacker cannot direct where this lands. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across firmware branches FW950 through FW1120 exposes a flaw in the hypervisor call (hcall) interface that allows a root-privileged guest partition user to permanently freeze a virtual processor by issuing a specially crafted hypervisor call, requiring a full platform re-IPL to restore operation - a platform-wide denial of service affecting all co-resident guest partitions. In a subset of cases, exploitation may also result in a small amount of data being written into hypervisor or partition memory, creating a limited integrity impact with no attacker-controlled targeting. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; IBM has released a patch via its support portal.
RemediationAI
Apply the firmware fix identified in IBM's security advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283231. IBM has confirmed a patch is available; administrators should consult that advisory for the specific fixed firmware levels for each affected stream (FW950, FW1060, FW1110, FW1120). As a compensating control prior to patching, environments hosting untrusted or semi-trusted guest partitions should consider auditing and restricting which guest accounts hold root privileges, as exploitation explicitly requires guest root. In environments where guest partition administrators are fully trusted (single-tenant deployments), the practical risk window is narrow, but patching remains advisable given the platform-wide availability impact. No workaround that eliminates the vulnerable hcall pathway has been identified in available data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM PowerVM is an enterprise-grade Type-1 hypervisor for IBM POWER architecture systems, providing logical partitioning (LPAR) for AIX, IBM i, and Linux guests. Guest partitions interact with the hypervisor through a defined hypervisor call interface, analogous to system calls in a traditional OS. CWE-129 (Improper Validation of Array Index) is the root cause, indicating that the hypervisor fails to adequately validate an index or parameter value passed via the crafted hcall, potentially causing out-of-bounds memory access or internal state corruption. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects that the vulnerable component boundary is crossed - a guest partition action impacts the hypervisor itself, potentially affecting all partitions on the platform. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:powervm_hypervisor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* across firmware streams FW950, FW1060, FW1110, and FW1120.
Know when Powervm Hypervisor gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
Description explicitly requires guest root (PR:H); all other metrics match IBM's vector given local access, no complexity, and scope change to hypervisor.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the PowerVM hypervisor call interface. An attacker with root access to a guest partition can issue a specially crafted hypervisor call causing a virtual processor to become permanently unresponsive, requiring a full platform re-IPL to restore normal operation. In some cases this may also cause the guest to inject a small amount of data into hypervisor or partition memory with no attacker control over the target location. Successful exploitation results in an integrity and availability impact to the managed system.
Executive ViewAI
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor firmware versions FW950 through FW1120 contain a vulnerability that allows a malicious or compromised virtual machine with root access to freeze the underlying platform, causing complete denial of service and requiring emergency restart of all co-resident workloads. In shared infrastructure environments, this breaks fundamental VM isolation guarantees. Leadership should prioritize immediate patching to restore infrastructure resilience and prevent application outages.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
More in Powervm Hypervisor
View allAfter performing a sequence of Power FW950, FW1010 maintenance operations a SRIOV network adapter can be improperly conf
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW860, FW940, and FW950 could allow an attacker that gains service access to the FSP can read and
Remote code execution in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor partition firmware exposes Power Systems environments during network boo
Network boot exploitation in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across firmware branches FW950, FW1060, FW1110, and FW1120 allows an
An internally discovered vulnerability in PowerVM on IBM Power9 and Power10 systems could allow an attacker with privile
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across four firmware trains (FW950 through FW1120) exposes an integer overflow (CWE-190) in its h
OS memory integrity compromise and hypervisor denial of service in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor (firmware FW950, FW1060, and F
Remote code execution in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor firmware versions FW950 through FW1120 allows an attacker with authentic
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW860.00 through FW860.B3, FW950.00 through FW950.70, FW1010.00 through FW1010.50, FW1020.00 thro
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW950.00 through FW950.71, FW1010.00 through FW1010.40, FW1020.00 through FW1020.20, and FW1030.0
Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor's host firmware configuration parsing allows authenticated service
Partition firmware in IBM PowerVM Hypervisor across firmware streams FW950 through FW1120 is vulnerable to a denial-of-s
EUVD-2026-62870
GHSA-h5jm-cv9m-pvc4
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB