Skip to main content

AppLockZ CVE-2025-68711

LOW
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel (CWE-288)
2026-05-26 mitre
2.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain physical device access
  2. Delivery
    Trigger advertisement or browser deep-link intent
  3. Exploit
    Navigate exposed Android activity route
  4. Execution
    Dismiss or bypass AppLockZ overlay
  5. Persist
    Access PIN-protected target app
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate displayed sensitive data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Alternate path authentication
Exploitation Conditions

Physical possession of the target Android device is the mandatory prerequisite (CVSS AV:P confirms this explicitly). The device must have AppLockZ 4.2.11 installed and actively configured with PIN lock enabled on at least one target application. No authentication is required from the attacker (PR:N per CVSS vector) - the bypass exploits a design flaw, not a credential weakness. Exploitation is further limited by: the device screen must be accessible to the attacker (i.e., the Android OS-level screen lock must already be bypassed or the device must be handed over in an unlocked state); the target protected app must be reachable via an advertisement SDK or browser intent, meaning not all AppLockZ-protected apps may be equally exposed. The vulnerability does not function remotely, cannot be triggered over a network, and has no impact on Android's native authentication layer.

Impact

The overall risk is low, supported by multiple converging signals. The CVSS base score is 2.4 (Low) with an attack vector of Physical (AV:P), meaning exploitation is gated by physical possession of the target device - a significant limiting factor in most threat models. The CVSS confidentiality impact is rated Low (C:L) with no integrity or availability impact, further bounding the blast radius. The EPSS score of 0.04% at the 11th percentile confirms near-zero observed exploitation activity in the wild. There is no CISA KEV listing. No verified CVE-specific POC is confirmed, though the researcher's GitHub repository (github.com/actuator/applock.passwordfingerprint.applockz) likely contains proof-of-concept material consistent with a research disclosure. The tags 'Privilege Escalation' and 'Information Disclosure' are technically accurate but should not inflate risk assessment - they apply within a narrow physical-access scenario. For enterprise environments where shared or kiosk devices run AppLockZ, risk may be elevated above the generic CVSS score; for typical personal devices, physical access implies the attacker already has meaningful control.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with brief unattended physical access to an Android device running AppLockZ 4.2.11 triggers a browser deep-link or advertisement intent that launches an exposed activity within a protected app, causing the AppLockZ overlay to be displaced or bypassed without prompting PIN or fingerprint verification. The attacker then accesses the previously locked app (such as Chrome with stored credentials or a banking app) and can read sensitive data. No network connectivity, special tools, or elevated privileges are required beyond physical possession of the unlocked device.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 27, 2026

Physical-access PIN lock bypass in AppLockZ 4.2.11 for Android exposes protected applications to unauthorized access without valid credentials. The root cause is architectural: the lock mechanism is implemented as a UI overlay rather than through Android's secure authentication APIs, leaving it vulnerable to circumvention via exposed activity routes reachable through advertisement or browser intents. An attacker with physical possession of the device can navigate cascading interface flows to evade lockscreen verification and access apps protected by AppLockZ (e.g., Chrome), resulting in information disclosure. No active exploitation is confirmed in CISA KEV, and the EPSS score of 0.04% reflects minimal real-world exploitation probability at this time.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at the time of this analysis. Users relying on AppLockZ 4.2.11 for sensitive app protection should consider uninstalling the application and replacing it with Android's native app-pinning feature (Settings > Security > App Pinning) or a solution that integrates with Android's BiometricPrompt or KeyguardManager APIs, which cannot be bypassed via overlay dismissal. As a compensating control, enabling Android's full-disk encryption and strong device screen lock (PIN, pattern, or biometric) at the OS level reduces the value of AppLockZ bypass since the OS lock must be defeated first. Restricting physical access to the device (MDM-enforced lockdown policies) also neutralizes this attack vector entirely. Security teams should monitor the researcher's disclosure repository at https://github.com/actuator/applock.passwordfingerprint.applockz/blob/main/CVE-2025-68711 for any vendor response or patch release updates.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

AppLockZ implements its locking mechanism as an Android UI overlay - a window drawn on top of the target app - rather than invoking Android's AccountManager, BiometricPrompt, or KeyguardManager secure authentication APIs. This architectural choice (CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel) means that any intent-reachable activity or navigation path that can dismiss or bypass the overlay layer circumvents the lock entirely. Android's intent system allows external triggers - including advertisement SDKs and browser deep-link intents - to launch exposed activities within apps. If AppLockZ's overlay can be interrupted or an underlying activity brought to foreground via such intents, the protection vanishes without any credential check occurring. The CPE data provided (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a) is unresolved and offers no additional product version signal beyond the description itself.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 2.4 LOW
AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Physical
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
May 27, 2026 - 21:22 NVD
2.4 (LOW)
CVE Published
May 26, 2026 - 00:00 nvd
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
May 26, 2026 - 00:00 nvd
LOW 2.4

DescriptionCVE.org

AppLockZ App Lock and Fingerprint Lock (applock.passwordfingerprint.applockz) 4.2.11 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android's secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents, an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome). This results in information disclosure and privilege escalation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 89% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

12
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +12
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy