AppLockZ CVE-2025-68711
LOWAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain physical device access
-
DeliveryTrigger advertisement or browser deep-link intent
-
ExploitNavigate exposed Android activity route
-
ExecutionDismiss or bypass AppLockZ overlay
-
PersistAccess PIN-protected target app
-
ImpactExfiltrate displayed sensitive data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Alternate path authentication
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Physical possession of the target Android device is the mandatory prerequisite (CVSS AV:P confirms this explicitly). The device must have AppLockZ 4.2.11 installed and actively configured with PIN lock enabled on at least one target application. No authentication is required from the attacker (PR:N per CVSS vector) - the bypass exploits a design flaw, not a credential weakness. Exploitation is further limited by: the device screen must be accessible to the attacker (i.e., the Android OS-level screen lock must already be bypassed or the device must be handed over in an unlocked state); the target protected app must be reachable via an advertisement SDK or browser intent, meaning not all AppLockZ-protected apps may be equally exposed. The vulnerability does not function remotely, cannot be triggered over a network, and has no impact on Android's native authentication layer. |
| Impact | The overall risk is low, supported by multiple converging signals. The CVSS base score is 2.4 (Low) with an attack vector of Physical (AV:P), meaning exploitation is gated by physical possession of the target device - a significant limiting factor in most threat models. The CVSS confidentiality impact is rated Low (C:L) with no integrity or availability impact, further bounding the blast radius. The EPSS score of 0.04% at the 11th percentile confirms near-zero observed exploitation activity in the wild. There is no CISA KEV listing. No verified CVE-specific POC is confirmed, though the researcher's GitHub repository (github.com/actuator/applock.passwordfingerprint.applockz) likely contains proof-of-concept material consistent with a research disclosure. The tags 'Privilege Escalation' and 'Information Disclosure' are technically accurate but should not inflate risk assessment - they apply within a narrow physical-access scenario. For enterprise environments where shared or kiosk devices run AppLockZ, risk may be elevated above the generic CVSS score; for typical personal devices, physical access implies the attacker already has meaningful control. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with brief unattended physical access to an Android device running AppLockZ 4.2.11 triggers a browser deep-link or advertisement intent that launches an exposed activity within a protected app, causing the AppLockZ overlay to be displaced or bypassed without prompting PIN or fingerprint verification. The attacker then accesses the previously locked app (such as Chrome with stored credentials or a banking app) and can read sensitive data. No network connectivity, special tools, or elevated privileges are required beyond physical possession of the unlocked device. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 27, 2026
Physical-access PIN lock bypass in AppLockZ 4.2.11 for Android exposes protected applications to unauthorized access without valid credentials. The root cause is architectural: the lock mechanism is implemented as a UI overlay rather than through Android's secure authentication APIs, leaving it vulnerable to circumvention via exposed activity routes reachable through advertisement or browser intents. An attacker with physical possession of the device can navigate cascading interface flows to evade lockscreen verification and access apps protected by AppLockZ (e.g., Chrome), resulting in information disclosure. No active exploitation is confirmed in CISA KEV, and the EPSS score of 0.04% reflects minimal real-world exploitation probability at this time.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch has been identified at the time of this analysis. Users relying on AppLockZ 4.2.11 for sensitive app protection should consider uninstalling the application and replacing it with Android's native app-pinning feature (Settings > Security > App Pinning) or a solution that integrates with Android's BiometricPrompt or KeyguardManager APIs, which cannot be bypassed via overlay dismissal. As a compensating control, enabling Android's full-disk encryption and strong device screen lock (PIN, pattern, or biometric) at the OS level reduces the value of AppLockZ bypass since the OS lock must be defeated first. Restricting physical access to the device (MDM-enforced lockdown policies) also neutralizes this attack vector entirely. Security teams should monitor the researcher's disclosure repository at https://github.com/actuator/applock.passwordfingerprint.applockz/blob/main/CVE-2025-68711 for any vendor response or patch release updates.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AppLockZ implements its locking mechanism as an Android UI overlay - a window drawn on top of the target app - rather than invoking Android's AccountManager, BiometricPrompt, or KeyguardManager secure authentication APIs. This architectural choice (CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel) means that any intent-reachable activity or navigation path that can dismiss or bypass the overlay layer circumvents the lock entirely. Android's intent system allows external triggers - including advertisement SDKs and browser deep-link intents - to launch exposed activities within apps. If AppLockZ's overlay can be interrupted or an underlying activity brought to foreground via such intents, the protection vanishes without any credential check occurring. The CPE data provided (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a) is unresolved and offers no additional product version signal beyond the description itself.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
AppLockZ App Lock and Fingerprint Lock (applock.passwordfingerprint.applockz) 4.2.11 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android's secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents, an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome). This results in information disclosure and privilege escalation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub
Exploit-DB