Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify service exposing APScheduler serializer
-
DeliveryCraft JSON or CBOR payload referencing gadget class
-
ExploitSubmit payload to deserialization endpoint
-
Executionunmarshal_object imports module and instantiates class
-
Persist__setstate__ executes attacker-controlled logic
-
ImpactAchieve RCE in worker process
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target application actively deserializes attacker-reachable input through APScheduler's JSONSerializer or CBORSerializer - typically a job store, broker, or HTTP/queue endpoint that accepts JSON or CBOR payloads from an untrusted boundary and passes them into unmarshal_object. No authentication or user interaction is needed at the serializer itself (CVSS PR:N/UI:N), but the limiting factor is application-level: APScheduler does not expose a network listener on its own, so vulnerability is contingent on the embedding application surfacing the serializer to remote input. Exploitation also requires that suitable gadget classes (with exploitable __setstate__ behavior) are importable in the target Python environment, which is generally true for production deployments that include common stdlib or third-party modules. |
| Impact | CVSS 9.8 with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H signals network-reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity exploitation yielding full CIA loss - consistent with a serializer-side RCE primitive. Public POC availability (the linked gist) raises practical risk, yet EPSS sits at only 0.06% (19th percentile) and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, indicating it is not yet seeing broad opportunistic exploitation. The realistic threat is gated by whether a deployed application actually accepts external JSON/CBOR APScheduler payloads, which APScheduler itself does not expose by default - the CPE is unspecified (n/a) and EUVD lists 'n/a n/a' for affected versions, so the practical blast radius depends heavily on downstream integrators. Net: treat as high priority for any service known to pass untrusted input into APScheduler's serializers, but lower priority for internal-only schedulers that only deserialize trusted job stores. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker identifies a web service that reads scheduled-job payloads from an exposed queue, webhook, or REST endpoint and hands them to APScheduler's JSONSerializer or CBORSerializer. They submit a crafted payload referencing a Python class whose __setstate__ has side effects (for example a subprocess or os-module gadget) with attacker-controlled state, and unmarshal_object imports the module, instantiates the class, and triggers code execution in the worker process; the published gist at gist.github.com/nedlir/11fb77f35a59cbba73392a086b02a9c6 provides working payload construction. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 20, 2026
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deserialize attacker-controlled data via the bundled JSONSerializer or CBORSerializer. The unmarshal_object routine dynamically imports modules and invokes __setstate__ on arbitrary classes, letting an attacker pivot an untrusted payload into code execution; publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS remains low at 0.06% (19th percentile).
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - neither the references nor EUVD enumerate a fixed version, so monitor https://github.com/agronholm/apscheduler for an upstream release and pin to it once published. As compensating controls, stop using JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer for any data store or transport that can receive untrusted input: switch to a serializer wrapped around a strict allowlist of permitted class paths, or move the job store to a backend the attacker cannot write to (for example a database protected by application-layer auth rather than a shared message bus). If you must keep the current serializers, place an authenticated, integrity-checked transport (mTLS or HMAC-signed payloads) in front of any endpoint that ultimately calls unmarshal_object - note this only shifts trust to the signing key and does not fix the underlying class-instantiation primitive. Audit application code for any path that feeds external HTTP, queue, or RPC bodies into APScheduler deserialization and gate it behind input validation until a patched release ships.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in pypi
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
APScheduler is a widely embedded Python library for scheduling deferred and recurring jobs, often used inside web backends, data pipelines, and microservices. Its JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer reconstruct Python objects by reading a class path from the payload, importing that module at runtime, instantiating the class, and feeding attacker-controlled state into __setstate__. This is a textbook CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data) flaw: although JSON and CBOR are themselves data-only formats, the surrounding unmarshal_object logic treats them as a serialization protocol that can resurrect arbitrary Python types, effectively reproducing the risk profile of pickle while masquerading as a 'safe' format.
Know when Python gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
The JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer in APScheduler (all versions including 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Insecure Deserialization. The unmarshal_object function allows for arbitrary class instantiation and state injection by dynamically importing modules and calling __setstate__ on any class available in the Python environment. An attacker can exploit this by submitting a specially crafted JSON or CBOR payload to an application using these serializers
Executive ViewAI
APScheduler, a widely-used Python task scheduling library, contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability affecting all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5 in its JSON and CBOR deserialization routines. With publicly available exploit code in circulation, any application using these vulnerable versions to process untrusted serialized data faces potential complete system compromise.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: (1) restrict or disable JSONSerializer and CBORSerializer if application does not require deserialization of untrusted data; (2) whitelist safe object types for deserialization; (3) isolate APScheduler instances from untrusted network sources via firewall rules or network segmentation; (4) enforce least-privilege runtime execution with dropped capabilities and resource limits in containerized deployments.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Kestra OSS (the open-source event-driven orchestration platform) prior to
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
Same weakness CWE-502 – Deserialization of Untrusted Data
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 12 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP3 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP4 | Fixed |
EUVD-2026-30947
GHSA-9cfw-f3f9-7mm7
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB