Citrix Cloud
CVE-2025-66391
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain read-only Citrix Cloud account
-
DeliveryInitiate password-reset workflow for target user
-
ExploitSet attacker-controlled OTP email
-
ExecutionReceive one-time password
-
ImpactComplete reset and hijack account
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must already possess a valid Citrix Cloud identity with at least read-only access to the target tenant (CVSS PR:L) - this is the key limiting factor: it is not exploitable by fully unauthenticated outsiders. Given that foothold, no additional special configuration is required; the flaw is present in the default workflow-authorization behavior of the platform, exploited over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). Concretely, the abuse targets account-management workflows such as password reset, where the attacker supplies their own email address to receive the one-time password. Exploitation is bounded to tenants where read-only roles are granted to semi-trusted users, and SSVC marks it non-automatable, so it cannot be reliably mass-exploited. |
| Impact | The signals are mixed and warrant nuance. The supplied CVSS is 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H), reflecting network-reachable, low-complexity abuse by an already-authenticated low-privilege user with high impact. SSVC reinforces meaningful concern: Technical Impact is 'total' and exploit maturity is 'poc', but Automatable is 'no', meaning it cannot be reliably mass-exploited at scale and requires a valid read-only foothold per target tenant. EPSS is low (0.38%, 30th percentile) and the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, so despite the public PoC there is no confirmed active or widespread exploitation - consistent with a targeted, insider-or-post-compromise abuse pattern rather than internet-wide scanning. One caveat: the input's A:H (availability) is not clearly supported by the description, which centers on unauthorized initiation of write operations and OTP disclosure (confidentiality/integrity); the availability rating appears inflated. Net: a genuine and serious authorization flaw for any tenant that grants read-only access to semi-trusted users, but the PR:L prerequisite and non-automatable nature place it below drop-everything, internet-wide urgency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An organization grants a contractor or junior analyst a read-only Citrix Cloud role for monitoring. Using the publicly available PoC (github.com/mandeepsohal/CVE-2025-66391), that user initiates a password-reset workflow for a higher-privileged administrator account and specifies an attacker-controlled email as the OTP destination; upon receiving the one-time password they complete the reset and seize the admin account. Given AC:L and no user interaction, the action is straightforward once a valid read-only session exists. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026
Privilege escalation via broken access control in Citrix Cloud (through 2025-11-10) lets a user holding only read-only permissions initiate privileged write workflows they should be barred from. Because the platform enforces authorization at the wrong step, a low-privilege operator can, for example, kick off a password-reset flow and have the one-time password delivered to an attacker-controlled email address, enabling takeover of other accounts. Publicly available exploit code exists (MITRE-reported, GitHub PoC), though there is no evidence of active exploitation and the EPSS probability is low at 0.38% (30th percentile).
RemediationAI
Because Citrix Cloud is a vendor-operated SaaS platform, the authoritative fix is applied server-side by Citrix - Patch available per vendor advisory at the service level; no customer-installable version applies. Administrators should confirm with Citrix support or the Trust/Security portal that their tenant is running the corrected authorization logic (monitor https://citrix.cloud.com/ and Citrix security bulletins for the specific remediation notice, which was not present in the supplied references). As compensating controls until confirmation, audit and minimize read-only role assignments, revoke read-only access from untrusted or unnecessary users, and enable/review administrative activity logging to detect anomalous password-reset or workflow-initiation events; where possible require step-up MFA on account-recovery flows so a leaked OTP alone cannot complete takeover. Trade-off: tightening read-only grants may disrupt legitimate auditors or monitoring integrations, so scope changes to non-essential accounts first.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a CWE-284 Improper Access Control weakness in the Citrix Cloud management/identity platform, a multi-tenant SaaS console for administering Citrix DaaS, NetScaler, and related services. The defect is an authorization gap in the workflow state machine: the platform checks a user's role when a write operation is finalized but not when the workflow is initiated, so a read-only role can trigger the sensitive first step (e.g., issuing a password-reset OTP). The CPE data is uninformative (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*), which is expected for a vendor-hosted cloud service that has no versioned on-prem software artifact - the affected surface is the live Citrix Cloud tenant rather than a downloadable product build.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Requires a valid read-only account so PR:L; network/low-complexity with no UI; high confidentiality (OTP leak) and integrity (unauthorized writes/account takeover), but no direct availability impact so A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
In Citrix Cloud through 2025-11-10, an account with read-only access can trigger the beginning of a workflow for write operations, e.g., the system will send a one-time password to an attacker-controlled email address when the attacker attempts to reset the password of a user account.
Executive ViewAI
Citrix Cloud contains a critical access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-66391) where publicly available exploit code exists that allows read-only users to execute privileged administrative workflows, creating pathways for account takeover and lateral movement. The flaw bypasses role-based authorization controls at the platform level, rendering standard permission-based security insufficient to prevent exploitation. With no vendor patch currently available, immediate detection and mitigation measures are essential to protect account security and organizational access control integrity.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) minimize and rigorously audit read-only privileged accounts; (2) enforce multi-factor authentication for sensitive workflows including password-reset operations; (3) implement real-time monitoring and alerting on administrative workflow attempts by low-privilege accounts; (4) restrict read-only account usage through application of least-privilege role-based access control; (5) conduct daily audit reviews of privilege escalation attempts; (6) segment network access to Citrix Cloud administrative interfaces to authorized networks only.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB