RCE

SSRF policy bypass in jshookmcp 0.3.1 allows an authenticated MCP client with network domain access to probe internal RFC 1918 and reserved addresses that are explicitly blocked by all other network tools on the same server. The `network_icmp_probe` and `network_traceroute` handlers call `resolveHostname` directly without invoking the central `resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget` guard, creating an inconsistent enforcement boundary. No CISA KEV listing exists, but proof-of-concept test code demonstrating the bypass via the `handleCallTool` dispatch path is included in the GitHub advisory (GHSA-c5r6-m4mr-8q5j), confirming exploitability without external traffic.

Remote code execution in Ray (the distributed compute/ML framework) before version 2.56.0 lets attackers run arbitrary code by feeding a malicious tar archive to the WebDataset reader. The read_webdataset() datasource invokes pickle.loads() on .pkl/.pickle entries and torch.load() with weights_only=False on .pt/.pth entries with no validation, so code executes inside every Ray remote worker that processes the archive. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the fix is available in Ray 2.56.0 and the issue is documented in a GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-hhrp-gw25-jr43) and a VulnCheck advisory.

Authenticated remote code execution in JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras (firmware 4.8.30.57701411) lets a logged-in attacker plant a shell script in writable JFFS2 persistent storage and invoke it via popen() through the authenticated Anyka config HTTP endpoint, yielding reboot-surviving persistent RCE. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by VulnCheck), though there is no confirmed active exploitation in CISA KEV. The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.7 reflects high attack complexity offset by full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Authenticated remote code execution in JAIOTlink C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP cameras (firmware 4.8.30.57701411) lets a logged-in attacker run arbitrary OS commands via the HTTP PUT NetSDK/Factory SetMAC endpoint. The Wireless parameter is only partially validated by sscanf(), so a value shaped as a valid MAC prefix followed by a semicolon and shell payload survives validation and is passed unsanitized into an echo command run through system(). Publicly available exploit code exists (VulnCheck), and CVSS 4.0 rates it 8.7 (High); no public exploit identified in CISA KEV, so this is not confirmed actively exploited.

Unauthenticated blind SQL injection in Control Web Panel (CWP) before 0.9.8.1225 lets remote attackers inject arbitrary SQL through the userRes POST parameter of the user endpoint, and because CWP's MySQL connection runs with root privileges the flaw escalates to full remote code execution via INTO DUMPFILE. Attackers write a PHP webshell into the web-accessible roundcube logs directory and execute commands as the cwpsvc account. Publicly available exploit code exists and a vendor patch has been released; this is a network, no-authentication, low-complexity issue (CVSS 4.0 9.3).

Code injection in the Wikimedia Foundation Timeline extension (EasyTimeline) allows authenticated wiki editors to execute arbitrary server-side code via crafted timeline syntax processed by the Perl-based EasyTimeline.Pl script and its PHP integration layer Timeline.Php. The vulnerability stems from CWE-94 improper code generation control, where user-supplied timeline markup is passed to the backend Perl interpreter without sufficient sanitization, enabling remote code execution on the MediaWiki server. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the RCE tag and network-accessible attack vector make this a high-priority patching target for any publicly editable or semi-public MediaWiki instance.

Local code execution and privilege escalation in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge (Linux) stems from unsafe handling of dynamically managed code resources, rooted in an insecure deserialization flaw (CWE-502). A low-privileged local user who can influence the data or model artifacts Megatron Bridge loads can achieve arbitrary code execution, escalate privileges, tamper with data, and disclose information. NVIDIA self-reported the issue with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Local privilege escalation and code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux stems from unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled input (CWE-502), allowing a low-privileged local user to achieve arbitrary code execution, tamper with data, and disclose information. NVIDIA reported the flaw with no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was provided. Megatron Bridge is an ML/LLM training framework, so impact centers on shared GPU/training hosts rather than internet-facing services.

Deserialization of untrusted data in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux allows a low-privileged local attacker to achieve code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure. Megatron Bridge is NVIDIA's model-interoperability tooling used to convert and load large-language-model checkpoints in the Megatron/PyTorch training stack, where unsafe object deserialization (CWE-94) lets attacker-controlled serialized data run arbitrary code in the process context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the CVSS 7.8 (High) rating with full C/I/A impact makes it a meaningful risk on shared or multi-tenant ML infrastructure.

Arbitrary code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux stems from improper control of code generation (CWE-94), allowing an attacker who convinces a user to process a malicious artifact to run code in the context of the training/inference workload. Successful exploitation can escalate privileges, tamper with data, and disclose information. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV; the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/UI:R) indicates local access with user interaction is required.

Insecure deserialization in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux (CWE-502) lets an attacker who supplies a crafted serialized object achieve code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure when a local user loads that data. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) shows the attack is local and hinges on the victim opening attacker-controlled content, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Megatron Bridge is a specialized NVIDIA library for bridging large-language-model training frameworks, so exposure is concentrated in ML/AI training and research environments rather than general enterprise fleets.

Arbitrary code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge on Linux arises from unsafe reflection (CWE-470), where externally-controlled input selects which classes or code resources are dynamically loaded. A local attacker who convinces a user to load a crafted artifact (e.g., a malicious model, checkpoint, or configuration) can trigger code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux arises from unsafe deserialization of untrusted data (CWE-502), allowing an attacker who tricks a user into loading a crafted serialized object to execute code, escalate privileges, tamper with data, and disclose information. The flaw affects the Megatron Bridge model-conversion/training tooling and is locally exploitable but hinges on victim interaction (UI:R). No public exploit code has been identified and the issue is not in CISA KEV, so there is currently no evidence of active exploitation.

Arbitrary code execution and privilege escalation in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge on Linux arises from unsafe deserialization of untrusted data, allowing a local attacker who convinces a user to load a malicious serialized object to run code, tamper with data, and disclose information. NVIDIA (the reporting vendor) rates it 7.8 (High); the CVSS vector requires local access and user interaction, so exploitation is not remote-unauthenticated. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Arbitrary code execution in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge (all versions per the NVIDIA advisory) arises from unsafe deserialization of untrusted data (CWE-502), where an attacker supplies a crafted serialized object — typically a malicious model checkpoint or configuration artifact — that a user loads locally, yielding code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.8 (High) with a local vector requiring user interaction (AV:L/UI:R) and no attacker privileges. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV; no EPSS score was provided.

Deserialization of untrusted data in NVIDIA Megatron Bridge for Linux (CWE-502) can lead to arbitrary code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, and information disclosure when a user loads attacker-controlled data. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) indicates a local attack requiring the victim to open or process a malicious artifact — consistent with unsafe deserialization of a model checkpoint, config, or serialized object. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV; EPSS was not provided.

Unauthenticated remote code execution as SYSTEM affects Hyland PACSgear MediaWriter 5.2.1, which exposes an unauthenticated .NET Remoting TCP service (PacsgearMediaServerEngine.dll) on port 9000. Remote attackers abuse the MarshalByRefObject unmarshalling technique against the default ObjectURIs (RemoteObj/UIRemoteObj) to gain an arbitrary file read/write primitive, then chain it with DLL hijacking to execute code as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by VulnCheck), making this a high-priority issue despite no CISA KEV listing at time of analysis.

Out-of-bounds write in the command interface of NVIDIA ConnectX SmartNICs and BlueField DPUs allows a local user holding virtual function (VF) access - typically a tenant inside a guest VM - to corrupt device memory via crafted input and potentially achieve arbitrary code execution on the network device itself. Because the CVSS scope is Changed (S:C), a successful exploit crosses the VF isolation boundary and threatens the host and other tenants, making this a serious multi-tenant/cloud isolation-breakout risk. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Hyland PACSgear PACS Scan 5.2.1 lets remote attackers gain SYSTEM-level control of medical imaging servers by abusing an exposed .NET Remoting TCP service (PGImageExchQueue.exe) on port 22222. The exposed service grants arbitrary file read/write with no authentication, which is chained with a DLL hijack in the PGImageExchangeQueueSvc.exe service to run code as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by VulnCheck); there is no public exploit identified as actively exploited, as it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Out-of-bounds write in the command interface of NVIDIA ConnectX network adapters and BlueField DPUs allows a local user holding an assigned virtual function (VF) to corrupt device memory via crafted input, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution on the device itself. Because the flaw sits at the firmware command interface reachable from a SR-IOV guest, a successful exploit crosses the guest/device trust boundary (CVSS scope-changed, base 9.0) and can compromise the host that owns the adapter. This is a vendor-reported issue with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing.

Privilege escalation and container escape in NVIDIA Container Toolkit for Linux (and the GPU Operator that bundles it) stem from a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition that can lead to arbitrary code execution, privilege escalation, and data tampering across a scope boundary. A low-privileged attacker who can win the race may break out of the intended isolation boundary of GPU-enabled containers. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV; NVIDIA is the reporting source via its product-security advisory 5850.

Arbitrary file write in the Feast Feature Server's `/save-document` endpoint lets an unauthenticated remote attacker write attacker-controlled JSON to the host filesystem, bypassing the endpoint's path restrictions to overwrite application configuration or startup scripts. Because no credentials are required (CVSS 9.1, PR:N), any network-reachable attacker can corrupt system integrity, cause denial of service through disk exhaustion, or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw also ships in Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI), which bundles Feast; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV.

Privilege escalation to full account takeover in pretix (open-source event ticketing) and its payment integration plugins (Stripe, pretix-mollie, pretix-oppwa, pretix-bitpay, pretix-payone, pretix-secuconnect, pretix-sofort, pretix-saferpay) lets an authenticated backend operator become any user and read any data in the system. The flaw chains three weaknesses: a signed-session-parameter transport path with no scope validation, a signing-oracle reuse of the same key/salt in an unrelated Referer-obfuscation redirect, and the admin "act on behalf of" impersonation feature. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis (CVSS 4.0 carries E:U, exploit unproven), but the vendor fixed all affected components in releases published 2026-07-01.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/lru_sort: handle ctx allocation failure DAMON_LRU_SORT allocates the damon_ctx object for its kdamond in its init function. damon_lru_sort_enabled_store() wrongly assumes the allocation will always succeed once tried. If the damon_ctx allocation was failed, therefore, code execution reaches to damon_commit_ctx() while 'ctx' is NULL. As a result, it dereferences the NULL 'ctx' pointer. Avoid the NULL dereference by returning -ENOMEM if 'ctx' is NULL.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/reclaim: handle ctx allocation failure Patch series "mm/damon/{reclaim,lru_sort}: handle ctx allocation failures". DAMON_RECLAIM and DAMON_LRU_SORT could dereference NULL pointers if their damon_ctx object allocations fail. The bugs are expected to happen infrequently because the allocations are arguably too small to fail on common setups. But theoretically they are possible and the consequences are bad. Fix those. The issues were discovered [1] by Sashiko. This patch (of 2): DAMON_RECLAIM allocates the damon_ctx object for its kdamond in its init function. damon_reclaim_enabled_store() wrongly assumes the allocation will always succeed once tried. If the damon_ctx allocation was failed, therefore, code execution reaches to damon_commit_ctx() while 'ctx' is NULL. As a result, it dereferences the NULL 'ctx' pointer. Avoid the NULL dereference by returning -ENOMEM if 'ctx' is NULL.

Zip slip (relative path traversal) in ClearML's StorageManager._extract_to_cache() allows a network-positioned attacker to write arbitrary files to the host filesystem, with confirmed RCE potential via cron job injection, SSH authorized_keys overwrite, or web shell deployment. Affected are all versions up to and including 1.16.5; the official CVSS score of 2.4 with I:L severely understates the real-world impact given the documented RCE paths. No KEV listing and no EPSS data were provided, but the presence of a public bounty report and a confirmed fix commit indicates the issue is verified. The fix is available in version 2.1.6.

Remote code execution in the UltraVNC repeater (through version 1.8.2.2) allows an unauthenticated attacker who can reach the built-in HTTP administration port (default TCP 80) to overflow a fixed 1000-byte global buffer and corrupt adjacent .bss globals, leading to arbitrary code execution on the host. The flaw lives in wi_senderr() and wi_replyhdr() in repeater/webgui/webutils.c, where the request URI is copied via unchecked sprintf before any authentication check runs. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 combined with pre-auth network reachability makes this a high-priority issue.

Remote code execution in the UltraVNC Viewer (all versions through 1.8.2.2) stems from an integer overflow in the RFB failure-response parser: a malicious or man-in-the-middle VNC server can send a reasonLen of 0xFFFFFFFF that wraps to 0 during buffer sizing, then stream 4 GiB into a 256-byte heap allocation. The flaw is reachable pre-authentication through connection-failure and auth-failure messages, so merely connecting a viewer to an attacker-controlled endpoint can corrupt the heap and potentially execute code as the user running the viewer. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the researcher confirmed a reliable heap-buffer-overflow write with AddressSanitizer.

Remote code execution in the UltraVNC Repeater (through version 1.8.2.2) allows an authenticated administrator to corrupt stack memory via the web GUI allow/deny rule parser, ultimately achieving code execution on the repeater host. The flaw (CWE-787, out-of-bounds write) is reachable only after admin login, but that barrier is significantly weakened when chained with CVE-2026-7839 (default password), which can hand an attacker the required credentials. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no EPSS/KEV data supplied, so this is currently a credentialed, chainable RCE rather than a confirmed mass-exploited threat.

Remote code execution in Pivotal CRM 6.6.4.08 (Aurea) arises from insecure deserialization in the Pivotal.Engine.Client.Services.Conversion.dll component, letting remote attackers run arbitrary code on the server. This is a bypass of the incomplete fix for CVE-2026-39253, and it remains exploitable on systems that only applied the earlier patch-ghi-15381-cwe-502-20251225.zip. No public exploit code has been identified, though public advisories exist for both this issue and its predecessor; EPSS is modest at 0.57% (43rd percentile) and it is not in CISA KEV.

SQL Injection vulnerability in GoAdminGroup GoAdmin (last release v1.2.26) allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the the __sort_type URL parameter on all /admin/info/{table} endpoints

Use after free in Audio in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's Chromoting (Chrome Remote Desktop) component on Linux, fixed in 150.0.7871.47, lets a remote attacker corrupt memory via crafted network traffic and potentially run arbitrary code. The flaw is a CWE-416 use-after-free reported by Google's internal Chrome security team; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV. Note a signal conflict: NVD scores this 9.8 (Critical) while Chromium itself rated the security severity 'Low', and EPSS is only 0.20% (10th percentile).

Use after free in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Use after free in PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted PDF file. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Remote code execution in Google Chrome desktop before 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the Scheduling component, letting a remote attacker run arbitrary code within the renderer sandbox when a victim opens a crafted HTML page. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV; EPSS is low at 0.21% (12th percentile). Google rates the Chromium security severity as Low despite the NVD CVSS of 8.8, reflecting that code execution is confined to the sandbox rather than the host.

Sandboxed remote code execution in Google Chrome desktop before 150.0.7871.47 lets a remote attacker run arbitrary code inside the renderer sandbox by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page, exploiting insufficient input validation in the WebAppInstalls component. Google rates the Chromium severity as Low because execution is contained within the sandbox and no escape is included, and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. EPSS is low (0.21%, 12th percentile) and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none.

Use after free in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Remote code execution in Google Chrome desktop versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 stems from insufficient policy enforcement in the WebHID component, letting a remote attacker who lures a victim to a crafted HTML page break out of intended HID access controls and run arbitrary code. Exploitation requires user interaction (visiting a malicious page) but no authentication, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; EPSS is low at 0.21% (12th percentile). Notably, Google rates the Chromium security severity as 'Low' while the NVD-style CVSS is 8.8, a discrepancy worth weighing when prioritizing.

Use after free in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Use after free in PageInfo in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Use after free in Bluetooth in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Use after free in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome's DevTools component (versions prior to 150.0.7871.47) lets a remote attacker run code inside the renderer sandbox after luring a victim into performing specific UI gestures with a malicious file. Rated Medium by Chromium but scored CVSS 7.5, the flaw stems from insufficient validation of untrusted input (CWE-20); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low at 0.24% (15th percentile).

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's V8 JavaScript engine (versions prior to 150.0.7871.47) allows a remote attacker to run arbitrary code inside the renderer sandbox by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page. Exploitation requires user interaction (visiting a malicious page) but no authentication, and the flaw carries a CVSS 8.8 with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.30%, 22nd percentile), indicating no evidence of widespread exploitation despite the high CVSS.

Use after free in Oilpan in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in Downloads in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Use after free in HTML in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Sandboxed remote code execution in Google Chrome's Cast Receiver component affects all desktop builds prior to 150.0.7871.47, where a use-after-free (CWE-416) can be triggered by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page. Google rates the Chromium severity as Medium because the resulting code execution is confined to the browser sandbox, though NVD scores it CVSS 8.8; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low at 0.27% (18th percentile).

Use-after-free in the Extensions component of Google Chrome before 150.0.7871.47 lets a remote attacker execute arbitrary code within the renderer sandbox when a victim opens a crafted HTML page. Chromium rated the security severity Medium, though the associated CVSS score is 8.8 (High) due to network vector and high impact; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low at 0.26%. Google has shipped a fixed Stable channel build.

Sandboxed remote code execution in Google Chrome for Android before 150.0.7871.47, stemming from a use-after-free in the Skia graphics library, lets a remote attacker run arbitrary code within the renderer sandbox by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page. Google rated the Chromium security severity as Medium, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; the EPSS score is low (0.26%, 17th percentile), and the bug is not on CISA KEV. Exploitation requires user interaction (visiting the malicious page) but no authentication.

Heap-based integer overflow in Google Chrome's Chromecast component allows an adjacent-network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution against browsers running versions prior to 150.0.7871.47. The flaw is reachable via crafted malicious network traffic and carries a high CVSS of 8.8; Google has shipped a stable-channel fix, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Chromium rates the underlying issue as Medium severity despite the high CVSS, reflecting the adjacency and interaction constraints.

Sandboxed remote code execution in the WebView component of Google Chrome for Android before 150.0.7871.47 lets a remote attacker run arbitrary code within the renderer sandbox when a victim loads a crafted HTML page. Rated CVSS 8.8 (network vector, no privileges, requires user interaction), the flaw is a CWE-416 use-after-free, but code execution is confined to the sandbox and would require a separate escape to reach the host. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low at 0.26% (17th percentile), indicating limited near-term mass-exploitation pressure despite the high base score.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome on Linux (versions prior to 150.0.7871.47) stems from a use-after-free in the Ozone platform layer, allowing a remote attacker who lures a victim into performing specific UI gestures on a crafted HTML page to execute arbitrary code in the browser context. Rated High by Chromium and CVSS 7.5, exploitation is gated by required user interaction and high attack complexity. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS probability is low at 0.26% (17th percentile).

Sandboxed arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome for iOS before 150.0.7871.47 lets an attacker who convinces a user to open a malicious file run code inside the browser's sandbox due to insufficient validation of untrusted input. Google rates the Chromium severity High and ships the fix in 150.0.7871.47; EPSS is low (0.15%, 4th percentile) and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The flaw requires user interaction (opening the file) and, per the description, the resulting execution is confined to the sandbox rather than the underlying OS.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome desktop before 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the Forms component, letting a remote attacker who lures a victim to a crafted HTML page corrupt memory and execute arbitrary code within the browser's renderer sandbox. Chromium rates the flaw High severity, CVSS 8.8, requiring only that the user visit a malicious page; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.26%, 17th percentile). A vendor patch is available in the June 2026 Stable channel release.

Arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome's DOM implementation lets a remote attacker run code within the renderer sandbox by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page. All desktop Chrome builds before 150.0.7871.47 are affected; Chromium rates the flaw High severity. No public exploit has been identified and EPSS probability is low (0.26%), but the vendor patch is already available and should be applied promptly.

Out-of-bounds read/write (use-after-free) in Google Chrome's GPU component lets a remote attacker who has already compromised the renderer process run arbitrary code - though still confined inside the sandbox - by serving a crafted HTML page to a Chrome build prior to 150.0.7871.47. Google rates the Chromium severity High and has shipped a fixed Stable-channel build; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS puts near-term exploitation probability at just 0.26%.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's Chromoting (Chrome Remote Desktop) component on Linux allows an adjacent-network attacker to run arbitrary code by sending malicious network traffic to a vulnerable client before version 150.0.7871.47. The flaw is a use-after-free memory-corruption issue rated High by Chromium and carries a CVSS 8.8. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, it is not in CISA KEV, and EPSS is low (0.24%, 15th percentile), indicating no observed exploitation activity yet.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome desktop versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the Canvas component, letting a remote attacker run arbitrary code within the renderer sandbox when a victim opens a crafted HTML page. The flaw carries a CVSS 8.8 (High) rating and requires user interaction (visiting a malicious page), but no authentication. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low at 0.26% (17th percentile).

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's Blink rendering engine (versions prior to 150.0.7871.47) allows a remote attacker to run arbitrary code inside the renderer sandbox by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page. The flaw is a use-after-free (CWE-416) rated High by Chromium and 8.8 (CVSS 3.1); it requires user interaction (visiting a malicious page) and no privileges. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, with a low EPSS of 0.26% (17th percentile).

Renderer-process remote code execution in Google Chrome desktop before 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the Input Method Editor (IME) component, letting a remote attacker run arbitrary code within the browser's sandbox when a victim visits a crafted HTML page. Rated High by Chromium and CVSS 8.8, it requires user interaction (visiting a page) but no authentication. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS score is low (0.26%, 17th percentile), indicating no evidence of widespread exploitation yet.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the browser's Import component, allowing a remote attacker who lures a victim into opening a malicious file and performing specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code. Rated High by Chromium and CVSS 7.5, the flaw has no public exploit identified at time of analysis and a low EPSS of 0.24% (15th percentile), consistent with its high attack complexity and required user interaction. A vendor patch is available in the June 2026 Stable channel update.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome for macOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the GFX (graphics) component, allowing a remote attacker to run arbitrary code after a victim opens a crafted HTML page. Chromium rates the severity High and the CVSS is 8.8, but exploitation requires user interaction (visiting a malicious page). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.26%, 17th percentile), indicating no observed weaponization yet.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome (Views UI component) prior to 150.0.7871.47 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page and inducing specific UI gestures that trigger a use-after-free. Rated High by Chromium and CVSS 7.5, the flaw is elevated in complexity by its requirement for user interaction, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; EPSS probability is low at 0.26%.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome on Windows before version 150.0.7871.47 allows an attacker to run arbitrary code by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page and getting them to perform specific UI gestures against the WebAppInstalls component. Chromium rates the flaw High severity; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS probability is low (0.26%, 17th percentile), indicating the attack is not yet broadly commoditized despite the serious impact.

Arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome desktop before 150.0.7871.47 arises from insufficient input validation in the Downloads component, letting a crafted Chrome extension break out of its intended sandbox constraints. An attacker who first convinces a victim to install a malicious extension can leverage the flaw to run arbitrary code, which Chromium rates High severity. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low (0.15%, 5th percentile), indicating no observed widespread exploitation.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome for Android before 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free in the Fullscreen component, letting a remote attacker who lures a victim to a crafted HTML page corrupt memory and run arbitrary code in the renderer. Chromium rates the flaw Critical, though CVSS scores it 8.8 because exploitation requires the victim to open the malicious page. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the EPSS probability is low (0.26%, 17th percentile), with CISA SSVC showing no known exploitation.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's Chromoting (Chrome Remote Desktop) component on Windows affects all desktop builds prior to 150.0.7871.47, where a use-after-free (CWE-416) lets a remote attacker corrupt memory via malicious network traffic. Google rates the Chromium severity Critical, and a vendor patch is available, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low at 0.24%. High attack complexity (AC:H) means the memory-corruption race is non-trivial to win reliably, tempering the CVSS 8.1 score.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome's Ozone platform-abstraction layer prior to 150.0.7871.47 lets a remote attacker execute arbitrary code by luring a victim to a crafted HTML page. The flaw is a use-after-free (CWE-416) rated Critical by Chromium and CVSS 8.8, requiring the victim to visit a malicious page (UI:R) but no privileges. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and EPSS probability is low (0.26%), but the memory-corruption class and 'total' technical impact make it a high-priority browser patch.

Remote code execution in Google Chrome on ChromeOS (versions prior to 150.0.7871.47) stems from a use-after-free in the Chromoting (Chrome Remote Desktop) component, letting a remote attacker corrupt memory and execute arbitrary code through malicious network traffic. Google rates the Chromium severity as Critical, and CVSS scores it 8.1 with a high attack complexity. As of this analysis there is no public exploit identified and it is not listed in CISA KEV; EPSS is low at 0.24% (15th percentile), and SSVC records exploitation status as none.

Local arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome for macOS (versions prior to 150.0.7871.47) stems from a use-after-free in the WebUSB implementation, which Chromium rates Critical. A local attacker who can present a malicious USB peripheral to a victim who authorizes it can corrupt renderer memory and run attacker-controlled code within the browser's context. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low (0.16%, 5th percentile), reflecting limited likelihood of widespread opportunistic exploitation.

Arbitrary code execution in Google Chrome desktop versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 stems from a use-after-free flaw in the Extensions component, which Chromium rated Critical severity. An attacker who convinces a victim to install a malicious extension can trigger the dangling-pointer condition through a crafted extension to run arbitrary code in the affected process. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.16%, 6th percentile), and CISA/SSVC records no observed exploitation.

Remote code execution is claimed in DokuWiki 2025-05-14b "Librarian" (build 56.2) via the register function in inc/auth.php, which security intelligence maps to CWE-640 (weak password-recovery mechanism) - a mismatch that suggests account-takeover-to-code-execution rather than a direct memory-corruption RCE. The CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 (network, no authentication, no user interaction) implies any internet-facing DokuWiki instance is at risk, and publicly available exploit code exists (a public gist proof-of-concept plus SSVC 'poc' exploitation status), though EPSS remains low at 0.26% (17th percentile), indicating no observed mass exploitation yet. Reported by MITRE and tracked as ENISA EUVD-2026-40863, it is tagged PHP/RCE but is not listed in CISA KEV.

Local arbitrary code execution in electron-builder (app-builder-lib) AppImage targets prior to 26.15.0 occurs because an empty path component in the runtime-set LD_LIBRARY_PATH adds the current working directory to the dynamic linker search path, letting an attacker who can plant a malicious shared library in the AppImage's launch directory hijack library loading. The flaw affects Linux AppImage bundles produced by app-builder-lib (the packaging engine behind electron-builder/electron-updater) and is fixed in 26.15.0. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; CVSS 7.8 reflects high local impact rather than remote exposure.

Arbitrary code execution in Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 stems from three distinct flaw classes: PHP object injection via unsafe unserialize() of attacker-controllable data in the Scheduler JobQueue, FileCache adapter, and Session components, an OS command injection in the plugin/theme InstallCommand git clone routine, and a Twig sandbox blocklist bypass enabling server-side template injection. An attacker who can influence the serialized input can chain available gadgets to run arbitrary PHP, while the command-injection path is reachable by authenticated administrators through plugin/theme installation. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issues were privately reported by VulnCheck and are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.

Arbitrary JavaScript execution in Crawl4AI's Docker API server (versions before 0.8.7) lets remote attackers submit code to the /execute_js endpoint, which runs it inside the server's Chromium browser context launched with --disable-web-security. Because the browser's same-origin and CORS protections are disabled, attacker-controlled JavaScript can pivot into server-side request forgery against internal services and metadata endpoints. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.2 (critical), though the vector's high attack complexity and present attack requirements indicate exploitation is not fully trivial.

Arbitrary code execution bypass in picklescan before 0.0.29 lets attackers smuggle malicious Python pickle files past the scanner by abusing the built-in profile.Profile.run function inside a pickle __reduce__ method, which picklescan's blocklist fails to flag. Because picklescan is a defensive ML supply-chain tool meant to certify pickle/model files as safe, the flaw is a security-control evasion: a file marked 'clean' executes attacker code on deserialization. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and it is not in CISA KEV; the CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.6 (High).

Malicious-pickle detection bypass in picklescan before 0.0.29 lets attackers smuggle weaponized pickle files past the scanner by abusing `code.InteractiveInterpreter.runcode` inside a `__reduce__` method, leading to arbitrary code execution when the file is later deserialized with `pickle.load()`. picklescan is a security scanner specifically meant to flag dangerous pickles (e.g. in ML model files), so a gap in its blocklist directly defeats the control users rely on. Reported by VulnCheck with an assigned CVSS 4.0 score of 7.6; no public exploit and no CISA KEV listing identified at time of analysis.

Detection bypass leading to arbitrary code execution in picklescan before 0.0.30 allows attackers to smuggle malicious payloads past the scanner by abusing the doctest.debug_script function, which picklescan's analyzer does not recognize as dangerous. Because picklescan is used to vet untrusted pickle/ML model files before loading, a crafted pickle marked 'safe' will execute attacker commands the moment pickle.load is invoked. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and this is not listed in CISA KEV, but the technique is well-understood and was disclosed by VulnCheck.

Scanner-detection bypass in picklescan before 0.0.30 lets a crafted pickle file evade malicious-code detection and execute arbitrary code on deserialization. The tool - a Python security scanner used to vet untrusted pickle/ML model files - fails to flag `cProfile.run` calls embedded in a pickle object's `__reduce__` method, so a payload routed through `cProfile.run` passes the scan and then runs when the file is loaded. Reported by VulnCheck (CWE-502); no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not in CISA KEV.

Static-analysis bypass in Picklescan before 0.0.25 lets attackers smuggle malicious pickle files past its malware scanner, leading to arbitrary OS command execution when a victim deserializes the file. Picklescan's denylist fails to flag unsafe Numpy globals, so a reduce method invoking numpy.testing._private.utils.runstring can import os and run commands while being reported as safe. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, though VulnCheck's advisory documents the exact gadget; the issue is not in CISA KEV. CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.6.

Detection bypass in picklescan before 0.0.29 allows attackers to smuggle arbitrary-code payloads past the scanner by abusing Python's built-in trace.Trace.runctx in a pickle reduce method, so a malicious model/pickle file is rated safe yet executes code when later deserialized with pickle.load(). picklescan is a security scanner used to vet untrusted ML pickle files (notably in the Hugging Face ecosystem), so this failure defeats the very control teams rely on to catch malicious models. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV; reported by VulnCheck with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 7.6.

Malicious pickle detection bypass in picklescan before 0.0.29 lets attackers smuggle arbitrary code execution payloads past the scanner by abusing the built-in trace.Trace.run function inside a pickle's __reduce__ method. Because picklescan does not flag trace.Trace.run as a dangerous global, a crafted model/pickle file is reported as safe yet executes arbitrary code when later deserialized via pickle.load. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; this is a classic deny-list gap in a security scanner that defenders rely on to gate untrusted ML artifacts.

Remote code execution in txtai through 9.10.0 lets a remote attacker reach the API /reindex endpoint and supply an arbitrary dotted callable (for example subprocess.getoutput) that the server imports and invokes during reindexing, running commands as the server process. The flaw is exploitable only when the API is network-exposed with no TOKEN set (so all endpoints are unauthenticated) and the index is writable - not the default posture. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the issue carries a high CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and was reported by VulnCheck.

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary Python via the flow `tool_code` mechanism, gaining full control of the Langflow process. Because the scope changes (S:C), the attacker can read every process secret, read and tamper with all flows, conversations, messages, uploads and saved components in the database, reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, and pivot across tenants on the same instance. This is a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) flaw, though no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Remote code execution in IBM Db2 11.5.0-11.5.9 and 12.1.0-12.1.4 lets unauthenticated network attackers run arbitrary code by abusing improper handling of the pre-authentication DRDA handshake. Because the flaw is reachable before any login, any client able to reach the database listener can trigger it, and the CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.

Remote code execution in IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 8.6.1.0-8.6.1.6 arises because three bundled ObjectInputStream subclasses (WsObjectInputStream, ObjectStreamPool$ReusableInputStream, ObjectInputStreamResolver) deserialize untrusted data without any JEP-290 lookahead class filter. When Oracle Coherence is present on the classpath, confirmed working gadget chains (RemoteConstructor.readResolve, PriorityQueue/ExtractorComparator) let a low-privileged authenticated attacker who can write a session attribute - or a LAN-adjacent attacker on the unauthenticated grid replication wire - run arbitrary code on peer WebSphere Application Server JVMs. A vendor patch is available; there is no public exploit identified and EPSS is low (0.29%), but IBM confirms the gadget chains function, giving total technical impact per SSVC.

Remote code execution in IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.6 arises from roughly 50 generated CORBA stub classes in the shipped ogclient.jar that invoke ORB.string_to_object() on an attacker-controlled IOR string during Java deserialization, converting any unfiltered ObjectInputStream sink in the surrounding WebSphere Application Server into outbound IIOP server-side request forgery. When chained with the IBM ORB getUserException class-instantiation flaw (tracked as WAS-26), that SSRF escalates to code execution on the calling JVM. CVSS is 10.0 (scope-changed, full CIA impact); EPSS is 3.01% (86th percentile) and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

Arbitrary code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to run code on the host by submitting flow definitions containing nodes with missing or empty component type fields. The improper input validation (CWE-20) lets malformed node specifications bypass type checks and reach unsafe execution paths in the low-code AI workflow engine. The CVSS vector (AV:N/PR:N) indicates network-reachable, pre-authentication exploitation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.