Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privileged local access on GPU host
-
DeliveryCraft malformed input to kernel-mode driver interface
-
ExploitTrigger improper input validation (CWE-20)
-
ExecutionExecute code in kernel context
-
ImpactEscalate privileges / crash system / disclose kernel memory
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires local access to a system running the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (Windows or Linux) with existing HIGH privileges (PR:H) to reach the vulnerable kernel-mode code path that improperly validates input; no user interaction is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors: exploitation is not remote (AV:L), the attacker must already hold high privileges before triggering the flaw, and only systems with the affected GeForce/RTX/Quadro/NVS/Tesla driver installed are exposed - this is a local escalation/kernel-compromise primitive, not an internet-facing exposure. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority local privilege-escalation-class flaw, not a remote emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U) is internally consistent with a kernel-mode driver bug: the attacker must already be on the host AND already hold high privileges (PR:H) to reach the vulnerable kernel-mode input-validation path, which caps the base score at 6.7 despite full C:H/I:H/A:H impact. The 'RCE' tag is misleading - with AV:L this is local code execution in kernel context, not network-exploitable remote code execution. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'; the NVIDIA reference bundle (bulletin 5861) is a patch/advisory, not a weaponization signal. The PR:H requirement is the dominant real-risk limiter: an attacker who already has high privileges gains limited marginal value from a further local escalation, though kernel code execution can still be used to defeat driver/OS integrity boundaries. Net: a legitimate patch-management item across NVIDIA GPU fleets, but not a drop-everything issue absent any exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local attacker who has already obtained high privileges on a Windows or Linux workstation or GPU compute node submits malformed input to the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver's kernel-mode layer, exploiting improper input validation (CWE-20) to corrupt kernel state. The result can be arbitrary code execution in kernel context, a driver/system crash (DoS), or disclosure/tampering of kernel memory. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Improper input validation in the kernel-mode layer of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver on Windows and Linux allows a local attacker who already holds high privileges to execute code, escalate privileges, disclose information, or crash the system. The flaw is not remotely reachable (AV:L) and requires existing HIGH privileges (PR:H) to reach the vulnerable kernel code path, with no user interaction needed; the resulting CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.7. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no EPSS score or KEV listing was provided in the available intelligence, making this a moderate-priority local privilege-escalation/kernel-compromise primitive rather than an internet-facing emergency.
RemediationAI
No fixed driver version is identified in the supplied input data, so remediation should begin by consulting the NVIDIA product security advisory for CVE-2026-47542 at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 (also tracked at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47542) and applying the vendor-recommended driver branch for the specific GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla product line and operating system in use; where the driver is managed through enterprise/enterprise-Tesla or vGPU packaging, coordinate the update with the OEM or hypervisor vendor. Until a patched driver can be deployed, compensating controls must target the prerequisite rather than the flaw itself, since the assessed vector requires AV:L and PR:H: enforce least privilege so that ordinary interactive users and low-privileged processes cannot obtain the high-privilege local access needed to reach the kernel-mode code path, which limits legitimate administrative workflows and is not a substitute for patching; on multi-user or VDI hosts, restrict who may load, install, or roll back GPU drivers and constrain interactive logon on GPU-bearing systems, accepting reduced usability for privileged operators; monitor and alert on anomalous driver interaction from high-privilege contexts, since such telemetry is noisy and may produce false positives; and, where the workload does not require GPU acceleration, avoid deploying or disable the affected driver entirely, at the cost of losing graphics/compute functionality. Applying the vendor advisory's driver update remains the only complete fix; note that NVIDIA has historically shipped the same CVE across multiple driver branches with differing version numbers, so verify the fixed version against the product line rather than assuming a single global build.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability lives in the kernel-mode driver layer of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver - the Windows kernel component (nvlddmkm.sys) and the corresponding Linux kernel modules - and is classified as CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation). The root cause class indicates that data or parameters crossing from a caller into kernel-mode handling are not adequately validated before use, which in a graphics/kernel driver context typically means unchecked structures, sizes, or indices passing through IOCTL/DirectX/DXGK or CUDA/NVAPI-facing interfaces. Because the flaw is in privileged kernel code, a successful trigger can subvert the driver's trust boundary, yielding code execution, denial of service, information disclosure, escalation of privileges, and data tampering as noted in the CVE record. The CPE data scopes the affected software to NVIDIA GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla driver branches across Windows and Linux, meaning exposure is tied to the installed GPU driver package rather than to a network service. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms the attacker must already possess high privileges and local access before exploitation; the vulnerability does not by itself grant initial access.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Kernel-mode driver reached only by an already high-privileged local user (AV:L, PR:H), no interaction needed (UI:N); kernel code execution yields full C/I/A impact within the unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).
CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia
DescriptionCVE.org
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an attacker could cause improper input validation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-90160
GHSA-8q5p-h5m9-69m9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB