Skip to main content

NVIDIA Display Driver EUVDEUVD-2026-90151

| CVE-2026-47522 MEDIUM
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-09-30 nvidia GHSA-6ffw-8wx6-cfcm
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege local access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malformed input to kernel driver interface
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper input validation
  4. Execution
    Execute code in kernel context
  5. Impact
    Escalate privileges / crash system

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access to a host running a vulnerable NVIDIA GPU Display Driver on Windows or Linux, AND the attacker must already hold high privileges (PR:H) to reach and invoke the affected kernel-mode driver interface. No user interaction is needed (UI:N). Affected products span GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla lines; per EUVD, GeForce driver builds prior to fixes such as 595.91.07/610.57.04/615.71.09/616.56, RTX/Quadro/NVS prior to 580.178.04/610.88/616.92, and Tesla prior to 596.86/615.71.09/616.92 (branch-dependent), with one GeForce 582.78 case limited to Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architectures. Limiting factors: the PR:H requirement means this cannot be used for initial access - the attacker needs existing elevated privileges - which is the single biggest constraint on real-world risk.

Impact

This is a genuine but moderate-priority vulnerability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U) is the dominant signal: exploitation is LOCAL and requires HIGH privileges (PR:H), meaning the attacker must already hold administrator/kernel-adjacent access on the host. This substantially lowers real-world risk despite the C:H/I:H/A:H full-impact triad, which is why the vendor score lands at 6.7 (Medium) rather than in the High/Critical range. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided in the input, so there is no signal of active or imminent widespread exploitation. The 'RCE' tag overstates reach - with AV:L this is local code execution, not network-remote code execution. The SSVC read is: exploitation=none observed, automatable=no (local + high privilege), technical impact=total. Net: a real defect worth patching on the standard cadence, but not a drop-everything emergency; the PR:H prerequisite makes it primarily a privilege-escalation/sandbox-integrity concern for an attacker who already has elevated access rather than an initial-access vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained high-privilege access on a Windows or Linux host with a vulnerable NVIDIA driver invokes an affected kernel-mode driver interface with crafted, improperly-validated input. Because input validation is inadequate in the kernel layer, the malformed request corrupts kernel state, enabling code execution in kernel context, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, data tampering, or a driver/system crash (DoS). No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Improper input validation in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver kernel-mode layer can be triggered by a locally present attacker who already holds high privileges, potentially yielding kernel code execution, denial of service, privilege escalation, information disclosure, or data tampering on Windows and Linux hosts. The affected code base spans all three major product lines - GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla - and NVIDIA has published branch-specific fixed driver versions for each. There is no confirmed active exploitation (the issue is not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis; the dominant real-world constraint is that PR:H means this cannot be used for initial access, only by an actor who has already obtained elevated privileges on the host.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to upgrade to the fixed driver build for your product line and branch - for example GeForce builds 580.178.04, 595.91.07, 610.57.04, 610.60, 615.71.09, or 616.56; RTX/Quadro/NVS builds 580.178.04, 595.91.07, 596.86, 610.57.04, 610.88, or 616.92; and Tesla builds 580.178.04, 595.91.07, 596.86, 610.57.04, 610.88, 615.71.09, or 616.92 - selecting the build that matches the installed branch, since the fixed version differs per product line and branch (one GeForce case, 582.78, applies only to Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPUs). Consult NVIDIA's bulletin at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 for the definitive mapping, and verify the resulting driver version after installation (for example via nvidia-smi on Linux or the NVIDIA Control Panel / driver properties on Windows). Because the exploited trust boundary is user-to-kernel with PR:H, there is no code-level configuration toggle that removes the exposure; the practical compensating controls are administrative - restrict local interactive logon and local administrator rights to trusted personnel only, audit and alert on privilege-escalation activity and unexpected kernel driver crashes (a common side effect of malformed input being handled), and treat any already-privileged local session as a potential vector until the driver is updated. Driver updates require a reboot and briefly interrupt display/GPU services, so schedule them in a maintenance window; on Tesla/datacenter systems, coordinate the update to avoid disrupting GPU compute workloads, and note that reverting to an older driver to avoid the reboot is not a safe workaround because it reintroduces the flaw. No vendor-released workaround short of updating the driver is documented in the available references, and no public exploit code has been identified, so there is no immediate emergency-patch pressure - but the update should be prioritized for multi-user and host containing sensitive workloads where local high privileges are broadly granted.

Affected VersionsENISA

Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a CWE-20 improper input validation flaw in the kernel-mode layer of the NVIDIA GPU display driver - the Windows kernel-mode display driver component and the Linux kernel module that sit between user-mode graphics/management APIs and the GPU. User-mode callers reach this layer through driver IOCTL/escape interfaces, and because the trust boundary is the user/kernel transition, any validation gaps let a caller pass malformed structures that the kernel driver processes without adequate bounds, type, or size checks. That root-cause class explains the uniformly high impact ratings on the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 6.7): success crosses into kernel context, so confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all rated High, and no user interaction is required. However, the vector's PR:H component means the caller must already possess high privileges on the affected host, which sharply limits this to a post-compromise or privileged-bystander scenario rather than a remote or unprivileged attack path. CPE data ties the flaw to NVIDIA GeForce, NVIDIA RTX/Quadro/NVS, and NVIDIA Tesla driver packages, i.e., essentially the entire current display-driver product family across Windows and Linux; one GeForce fix case (582.78) is explicitly restricted to GPUs built on the Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal architectures, indicating architecture-specific code paths for at least part of the affected surface. The CVE is tracked in ENISA's EUVD as EUVD-2026-90151 and reported by NVIDIA itself.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Kernel-mode driver reachable only via local access and requiring high privilege (AV:L, PR:H); improper validation yields full kernel-context compromise, so C/I/A all High, scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 6.7 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an attacker could cause improper input validation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GeForce/RTX/Quadro/NVS/Tesla drivers on huge Windows and Linux install base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy