Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconCraft forged JWT with admin claims
-
DeliverySend token to API Gateway endpoint
-
ExploitBypass authentication via missing signature check
-
InstallExecute privileged API operations
-
C2Exfiltrate multi-tenant data
-
ExecuteCreate persistent Cognito backdoor accounts
-
ImpactMaintain administrative access
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | No special conditions required - remote unauthenticated exploitation against default AWS Ops Wheel deployments. The vulnerability is exploitable via standard HTTPS requests to any exposed API Gateway endpoint serving AWS Ops Wheel. Attack complexity is low (CVSS AC:L) because JWT forgery requires only publicly available JWT libraries and knowledge of claim structure. No user interaction (CVSS UI:N) or privileges (CVSS PR:N) are required. Exploitation is not limited by network position, configuration variations, or deployment modes. The only limiting factor is network reachability to the API Gateway endpoint - organizations with API Gateway restricted to VPC-only access or behind additional authentication layers may have reduced exposure, but the vulnerability itself imposes no exploitation barriers once endpoint access is achieved. |
| Impact | This vulnerability represents critical real-world risk despite absence of EPSS or KEV data. The CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) accurately reflects exploitability - remote attackers need zero authentication, no user interaction, and face low attack complexity. SSVC framework assessment: Exploitation is trivial (fully automatable token forgery), technical impact is total (confidentiality, integrity, availability all compromised across tenants), and mission prevalence is situated (AWS Ops Wheel is not universally deployed but used in production AWS environments). The multi-tenant impact escalates risk significantly - a single exploit can compromise data across organizational boundaries. Patch availability from vendor (GitHub PR #164) is confirmed, but requires redeployment rather than automatic update, creating a window of vulnerability until operators take action. The absence of public exploit code may be temporary given the simplicity of JWT forgery attacks. Priority should be IMMEDIATE for organizations running AWS Ops Wheel, as the barrier to exploitation is essentially zero and impact is catastrophic. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An external attacker crafts a JWT token with administrative claims and no valid signature, setting the user role to 'admin' and tenant ID to target any organization in the multi-tenant deployment. They send this forged token in the Authorization header to the AWS Ops Wheel API Gateway endpoint. Because the application fails to verify the JWT signature, it accepts the token as authentic and grants full administrative privileges. The attacker then uses API calls to enumerate all tenant data, exfiltrate sensitive operational configurations, modify infrastructure automation rules to establish persistence, and create new Cognito user accounts for continued access. The entire attack requires only HTTP client capabilities and basic JWT structure knowledge - no authentication credentials, no social engineering, no complex exploit chains. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Apr 24, 2026
Missing JWT signature verification in AWS Ops Wheel enables remote unauthenticated attackers to forge administrative tokens and gain complete control over all application data and Cognito user accounts across all tenants. This critical authentication bypass (CVSS 9.8) has a vendor-released patch available via GitHub PR #164. EPSS data not available, but the combination of zero authentication requirements, network attack vector, and multi-tenant data exposure creates immediate exploitation risk for all deployments.
RemediationAI
Immediately redeploy AWS Ops Wheel from the updated GitHub repository incorporating the fixes from pull request #164 at https://github.com/aws/aws-ops-wheel/pull/164. Organizations running forked or derivative implementations must manually apply the JWT signature verification patches from the upstream fix. The remediation requires full redeployment rather than in-place patching, so plan for brief service interruption and test in non-production environments first. Until redeployment is complete, implement network-level access controls to restrict API Gateway endpoint access to trusted IP ranges only - this reduces but does not eliminate risk, as internal threats and compromised credentials can still exploit the flaw. Organizations unable to immediately redeploy should consider temporarily disabling the AWS Ops Wheel deployment until patching is complete, weighing operational impact against the critical security exposure. Review Cognito User Pool access logs for suspicious administrative actions or unexpected user modifications that may indicate prior exploitation. Refer to official AWS security bulletin AWS-2026-018 for additional vendor guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AWS Ops Wheel is an AWS-native operational tool for managing infrastructure tasks. The vulnerability stems from CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature), where the application accepts JWT tokens without validating their cryptographic signatures. JWT (JSON Web Tokens) rely on cryptographic signatures to ensure authenticity - the absence of signature verification allows attackers to craft arbitrary tokens with any claims, including administrative privileges. The flaw affects the API Gateway endpoint authentication layer, which should validate tokens issued by AWS Cognito but instead trusts the token payload without signature checks. This is a textbook example of security control bypass through incomplete cryptographic validation, particularly dangerous in multi-tenant cloud environments where privilege escalation can cross organizational boundaries.
Know when AWS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L
Primary rating from Vendor (AMZN) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: AMZN
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Missing JWT signature verification in AWS Ops Wheel allows unauthenticated attackers to forge JWT tokens and gain unintended administrative access to the application, including the ability to read, modify, and delete all application data across tenants and manage Cognito user accounts within the deployment's User Pool, via a crafted JWT sent to the API Gateway endpoint.
To remediate this issue, users should redeploy from the updated repository and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.
Executive ViewAI
AWS Ops Wheel contains a critical JWT signature verification bypass (CVE-2026-6911, CVSS 9.8) that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge administrative tokens and gain complete control over application data and Cognito user accounts across all tenants. This authentication bypass poses immediate risk to all deployments and requires urgent patching to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive multi-tenant infrastructure.
Apply vendor patch. If immediate patching is not possible: implement network-layer access controls to restrict administrative endpoints to trusted IP ranges only; implement rate limiting on token generation endpoints; enable comprehensive logging and alerting on administrative token usage; consider air-gapping the affected system until patch deployment is feasible.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Loom for AWS deployments running a version before 1.6.1 with no identity provider configured expose an unauthenticated s
Unauthorized data access in Budibase low-code platform before 3.30.4 allows unauthenticated users to manipulate internal
Authenticated Typebot users can abuse the webhook block (HTTP Request component) in versions prior to 3.13.1 to issue ar
Multiple vulnerabilities in ASTPP 4.0.1 including XSS and command injection in SIP device configuration and plugin manag
Remote code execution in Amazon awslabs postgres-mcp-server before 1.1.7 lets remote actors run arbitrary OS commands on
Remote code execution in AWS AgentCore CLI before v0.14.2 allows authenticated attackers to inject Python code via craft
Denial of service in the aws-smithy-json Rust runtime crate (versions before 0.62.7) lets remote unauthenticated attacke
Denial of service in Amazon's aws-smithy-http-server Rust crate (versions prior to 0.66.5) lets remote unauthenticated a
Argument injection in the AWS Bedrock AgentCore Python SDK before 1.18.1 lets a remote authenticated user run arbitrary
Arbitrary file read in amazon-mq rabbitmq-aws before 0.2.1 allows authenticated remote users to read any file accessible
WAF managed-rule body inspection on AWS Application Load Balancer (ALB) can be bypassed by remote actors who fragment an
WAF inspection bypass in Amazon CloudFront (with AWS WAF enabled) lets remote actors smuggle malicious request bodies pa
EUVD-2026-25576
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB