Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
CSRF needs a victim's authenticated session and interaction (UI:R, no attacker privileges); primary impact is unauthorized state change (I:H), with limited confidentiality and unconfirmed scope change, so S:U and C:L pending RCE verification.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Halo CMS versions up to 2.25.4 via the CorsConfigurer.java and the CsrfConfigurer.java components. This allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
AnalysisAI
Cross-site request forgery in Halo CMS through version 2.25.4 lets a remote attacker abuse weaknesses in the CorsConfigurer.java and CsrfConfigurer.java security-configuration components to force an authenticated victim's browser into performing unintended state-changing actions. The advisory further claims this can lead to arbitrary code execution, though the CWE-352/CSRF classification and the CVSS user-interaction requirement suggest the RCE outcome is likely a chained or victim-privilege-dependent consequence rather than a direct memory-corruption RCE. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires an authenticated Halo CMS user (ideally an administrator) to be logged in and to interact with attacker-controlled content (UI:R in the CVSS vector) - for example, visiting a malicious webpage while holding a valid Halo session. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | Signals conflict and should be weighed carefully. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | Full exploit scenario with step-by-step reproduction available after sign-in. |
| Remediation | No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data; upgrade to the latest Halo release beyond 2.25.4 once the vendor confirms a fixed version, tracking the halo-dev/halo repository and its security advisories. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours: Inventory all Halo CMS deployments and document current versions in use. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m
Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti
Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent
Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up
The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow
Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla
The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during
Same weakness CWE-352 – Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-61145
GHSA-5x82-gw26-c8r3