Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privilege local access
-
DeliveryCraft malformed firmware input
-
ExploitTrigger improper input validation flaw
-
ExecutionAchieve kernel code execution
-
ImpactEscalate privileges / disclose or tamper with data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local access to a system running the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows or Linux (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla product lines) AND pre-existing HIGH privileges (PR:H) on that host - the attacker must already be able to reach the privileged firmware input path. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no scope change occurs (S:U). The malformed-input trigger is against the GPU firmware validation logic. Limiting factors: this is not remotely reachable (AV:L), cannot be performed by an unprivileged local user, and requires the NVIDIA driver to be installed - so it is realistically a post-compromise privilege/kernel-boundary escalation rather than an initial-access vector. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority local vulnerability, not a high-real-risk one, despite the alarming impact list. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U) confirms the attack is LOCAL and requires HIGH privileges - the attacker must already hold administrative/elevated access on the host to reach the vulnerable firmware input-validation path. This materially caps the 6.7 (Medium) score; the PR:H requirement is the dominant limiting factor and distinguishes this CVE from its many PR:L siblings in the same NVIDIA bulletin (5861). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The 'RCE' tag overstates reality - with AV:L this is local code execution, not remote. There is no SSVC data provided. Net: the full-CIA impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) looks severe, but the PR:H precondition means an attacker already needs significant access, making this a defense-in-depth / privilege-boundary hardening patch rather than an urgent externally-facing emergency. Note a tag-quality conflict: the record carries a 'Microsoft' vendor tag, which is incorrect - this is an NVIDIA product affecting both Windows and Linux. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained high/administrative privileges on a Windows or Linux machine with an NVIDIA GPU driver installed submits malformed input to the GPU firmware interface, exploiting the improper input validation (CWE-20) to trigger memory corruption. This could escalate into kernel-level code execution, crash the display driver (DoS), leak memory contents, or tamper with GPU state. No public exploit code is known, and the high-privilege prerequisite limits this to post-compromise or insider scenarios. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Improper input validation in NVIDIA GPU Display Driver firmware for Windows and Linux (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla product lines) allows a locally positioned attacker who already holds high privileges to trigger code execution, denial of service, privilege escalation, information disclosure, and data tampering within the GPU firmware handling path. Scoring 6.7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), the flaw is not remotely reachable and cannot be exercised by an unprivileged local user, so it is best characterized as a post-compromise privilege/kernel-boundary escalation rather than an initial-access vector. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and there is no indication of confirmed active exploitation; EPSS scoring was not provided in the available intelligence.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is to upgrade to the driver release referenced in NVIDIA's product-security advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861, which covers the affected GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla Windows and Linux driver branches; no exact fixed version number was included in the provided data, so the precise branch build must be confirmed against that advisory - no vendor-released patch version was identified at time of analysis, and absence of an explicit version in this dataset should not be read as confirmation that no fix exists. Because exploitation requires local access plus pre-existing high privileges, the most effective compensating controls are strict minimization of local administrative and kernel-level access on GPU-enabled hosts, coupled with application allow-listing and endpoint detection tuned to suspicious driver or firmware interaction; these reduce the attacker population able to reach the vulnerable input path but do not eliminate the flaw. Where driver rollback or feature restriction is impractical (for example in virtualized GPU or Tesla datacenter deployments), isolate GPU-capable workloads and monitor for anomalous firmware behavior, accepting that such controls add operational overhead and detection latency rather than providing a true fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is an instance of CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) located in NVIDIA GPU display driver firmware, the low-level blob that runs on the GPU and mediates operations issued by the host driver. Because firmware-level validation of driver-supplied input is insufficient, a caller reaching that interface with malformed parameters can influence firmware execution, which is why the impact triad includes confidentiality, integrity, and availability effects. The CVSS vector confirms local access (AV:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), high privileges required (PR:H), no user interaction (UI:N), and no scope change (S:U), meaning the attacker must already be operating at an elevated level on the host that can reach the privileged firmware input path. Affected CPE data spans multiple NVIDIA consumer and professional/enterprise driver families - nvidia:geforce, nvidia:rtx,_quadro,_nvs, and nvidia:tesla - across Windows and Linux, indicating a shared firmware validation weakness rather than a single product-line defect.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Firmware path reachable only with elevated local privileges (AV:L, PR:H), no user interaction, and full local CIA impact via kernel-level code execution; matches vendor 6.7.
Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).
CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia
DescriptionCVE.org
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the firmware where an attacker could cause improper input validation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-90164
GHSA-423c-wchp-627g
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB