Skip to main content

NVIDIA Display Driver CVE-2026-47547

| EUVDEUVD-2026-90164 MEDIUM
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-09-30 nvidia GHSA-423c-wchp-627g
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: nvidia
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privilege local access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malformed firmware input
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper input validation flaw
  4. Execution
    Achieve kernel code execution
  5. Impact
    Escalate privileges / disclose or tamper with data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local access to a system running the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows or Linux (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla product lines) AND pre-existing HIGH privileges (PR:H) on that host - the attacker must already be able to reach the privileged firmware input path. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no scope change occurs (S:U). The malformed-input trigger is against the GPU firmware validation logic. Limiting factors: this is not remotely reachable (AV:L), cannot be performed by an unprivileged local user, and requires the NVIDIA driver to be installed - so it is realistically a post-compromise privilege/kernel-boundary escalation rather than an initial-access vector.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority local vulnerability, not a high-real-risk one, despite the alarming impact list. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U) confirms the attack is LOCAL and requires HIGH privileges - the attacker must already hold administrative/elevated access on the host to reach the vulnerable firmware input-validation path. This materially caps the 6.7 (Medium) score; the PR:H requirement is the dominant limiting factor and distinguishes this CVE from its many PR:L siblings in the same NVIDIA bulletin (5861). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the input, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The 'RCE' tag overstates reality - with AV:L this is local code execution, not remote. There is no SSVC data provided. Net: the full-CIA impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) looks severe, but the PR:H precondition means an attacker already needs significant access, making this a defense-in-depth / privilege-boundary hardening patch rather than an urgent externally-facing emergency. Note a tag-quality conflict: the record carries a 'Microsoft' vendor tag, which is incorrect - this is an NVIDIA product affecting both Windows and Linux.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained high/administrative privileges on a Windows or Linux machine with an NVIDIA GPU driver installed submits malformed input to the GPU firmware interface, exploiting the improper input validation (CWE-20) to trigger memory corruption. This could escalate into kernel-level code execution, crash the display driver (DoS), leak memory contents, or tamper with GPU state. No public exploit code is known, and the high-privilege prerequisite limits this to post-compromise or insider scenarios.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026

Improper input validation in NVIDIA GPU Display Driver firmware for Windows and Linux (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla product lines) allows a locally positioned attacker who already holds high privileges to trigger code execution, denial of service, privilege escalation, information disclosure, and data tampering within the GPU firmware handling path. Scoring 6.7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), the flaw is not remotely reachable and cannot be exercised by an unprivileged local user, so it is best characterized as a post-compromise privilege/kernel-boundary escalation rather than an initial-access vector. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and there is no indication of confirmed active exploitation; EPSS scoring was not provided in the available intelligence.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to upgrade to the driver release referenced in NVIDIA's product-security advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861, which covers the affected GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla Windows and Linux driver branches; no exact fixed version number was included in the provided data, so the precise branch build must be confirmed against that advisory - no vendor-released patch version was identified at time of analysis, and absence of an explicit version in this dataset should not be read as confirmation that no fix exists. Because exploitation requires local access plus pre-existing high privileges, the most effective compensating controls are strict minimization of local administrative and kernel-level access on GPU-enabled hosts, coupled with application allow-listing and endpoint detection tuned to suspicious driver or firmware interaction; these reduce the attacker population able to reach the vulnerable input path but do not eliminate the flaw. Where driver rollback or feature restriction is impractical (for example in virtualized GPU or Tesla datacenter deployments), isolate GPU-capable workloads and monitor for anomalous firmware behavior, accepting that such controls add operational overhead and detection latency rather than providing a true fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
Tesla All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 582.78
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 616.56
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 616.92
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.88
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 610.88
GeForce All driver versions prior to 582.78 Only GPUs based on the NVIDIA Maxwell, Volta, and Pascal GPU architectures are affected.
Tesla All driver versions prior to 596.86
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.60
GeForce All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 580.178.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
GeForce All driver versions prior to 615.71.09
GeForce All driver versions prior to 610.57.04
Tesla All driver versions prior to 616.92
RTX, Quadro, NVS All driver versions prior to 596.86
Tesla All driver versions prior to 595.91.07
GeForce All driver versions prior to 595.91.07

Affected Packages

euvd geforce_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd rtx_quadro_nvs_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix
euvd tesla_all_driver_versions_prior_to no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is an instance of CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) located in NVIDIA GPU display driver firmware, the low-level blob that runs on the GPU and mediates operations issued by the host driver. Because firmware-level validation of driver-supplied input is insufficient, a caller reaching that interface with malformed parameters can influence firmware execution, which is why the impact triad includes confidentiality, integrity, and availability effects. The CVSS vector confirms local access (AV:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), high privileges required (PR:H), no user interaction (UI:N), and no scope change (S:U), meaning the attacker must already be operating at an elevated level on the host that can reach the privileged firmware input path. Affected CPE data spans multiple NVIDIA consumer and professional/enterprise driver families - nvidia:geforce, nvidia:rtx,_quadro,_nvs, and nvidia:tesla - across Windows and Linux, indicating a shared firmware validation weakness rather than a single product-line defect.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (nvidia) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Firmware path reachable only with elevated local privileges (AV:L, PR:H), no user interaction, and full local CIA impact via kernel-level code execution; matches vendor 6.7.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE HIGH
Red Hat 6.7 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).

CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the firmware where an attacker could cause improper input validation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
NVIDIA GeForce/RTX/Quadro/NVS/Tesla drivers ship on a huge share of GPU systems
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy