Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconLure victim to malicious site
-
DeliveryDeliver crafted HTML payload
-
ExploitExploit separate renderer bug
-
InstallGain code execution in sandboxed renderer
-
C2Trigger Views input-validation flaw via IPC
-
ExecuteEscape sandbox into browser process
-
ImpactExecute code with user privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must already control the renderer process - meaning a separate renderer-compromise vulnerability must be chained in first; this CVE alone does not give initial code execution. The victim must visit attacker-controlled content (UI:R: user interaction required, typically loading a crafted HTML page), the target must be running Chrome on Linux at a version below 149.0.7827.103, and the CVSS AC:H signals that the exploit relies on conditions outside the attacker's direct control such as specific timing, memory layout, or Views state. No authentication to Chrome or any service is required (PR:N). Limiting factors: the two-bug chain requirement, the Linux-only scope per the description, the High attack complexity, and the absence of any public PoC at time of analysis materially raise the bar above a single-click drive-by. |
| Impact | This is a meaningful but not top-tier urgency item. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H captures the dual-edged nature: scope change and full CIA impact justify the 8.3, but the High attack complexity (AC:H) plus required user interaction (UI:R) plus the implicit precondition of an already-compromised renderer mean exploitation is non-trivial and chained. There is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score provided, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, suggesting this is not yet being weaponized in the wild. However, sandbox-escape bugs are exactly the class commercial spyware vendors and nation-state actors stockpile to pair with renderer RCEs, so the realistic risk to high-value targets (journalists, dissidents, executives) is materially higher than the absence-of-exploit signals suggest. Patch promptly, but it does not warrant the same emergency response as a single-bug unauthenticated RCE. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker first lures a target to a malicious or compromised site that exploits a separate renderer-process bug (V8, Blink, WebGPU, etc.) to gain code execution inside the sandboxed renderer. From that foothold, the attacker delivers a crafted HTML page or payload that abuses the Views input-validation flaw across the renderer-to-browser IPC boundary, escaping the sandbox to run code in the browser process with the user's full privileges. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but this is the standard renderer-RCE-plus-sandbox-escape pattern used by commercial exploit vendors. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026
Sandbox escape in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 149.0.7827.103 allows a remote attacker who has already compromised the renderer process to break out of the sandbox via a crafted HTML page, escalating from a contained renderer context to broader host access. Chromium rates this High severity, and while no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, the CVSS 8.3 score reflects the serious consequence of bypassing one of the browser's core security boundaries. The flaw resides in the Views component and requires user interaction (UI:R) plus a prior renderer compromise, making it a second-stage vulnerability in a multi-bug exploit chain.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Google Chrome 149.0.7827.103 on Linux - upgrade immediately via the Chrome Releases stable channel advisory at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0153744567.html. For enterprise fleets, push the update through your existing managed-browser channel (Chrome Browser Cloud Management, MDM, or package manager) and verify version compliance with chrome://version. There is no documented standalone workaround for the Views flaw itself, but because exploitation requires a prior renderer compromise, hardening the renderer attack surface helps: enable Site Isolation (default on desktop), keep V8 and Blink current, and consider site-specific extensions like enforced HTTPS-only mode and aggressive ad/script blocking on untrusted sites to reduce the chance of a renderer bug being triggered in the first place. Users of downstream Chromium browsers should track their vendor's corresponding patched release before assuming they are remediated.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Views is Chromium's cross-platform UI framework responsible for rendering browser chrome elements such as menus, dialogs, and window decorations, and it runs in the more-privileged browser process rather than the sandboxed renderer. The CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) classification indicates that Views accepts data or messages from the renderer (typically via Mojo IPC) without adequately validating them, enabling a compromised renderer to influence browser-process behavior in unintended ways. Because the renderer sandbox on Linux uses namespaces and seccomp-bpf to confine untrusted web content, any logic flaw in a cross-process interface like Views becomes a candidate sandbox-escape primitive - turning a renderer RCE into full browser-process code execution.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (google).
CVSS VectorVendor: google
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Inappropriate implementation in Views in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 149.0.7827.103 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Executive ViewAI
A sandbox escape vulnerability in Google Chrome for Linux (CVE-2026-11682) allows attackers who have already compromised the browser's renderer process to escalate access to the underlying system. This high-severity flaw bypasses Chrome's core security isolation mechanism, creating a pathway to full system compromise. Organizations with Linux deployments should prioritize patching to prevent post-exploitation lateral movement.
Apply vendor patch: Google Chrome 149.0.7827.103 or later.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Related Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Use-After-Free and Memory Safety Flaws
View all 74Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allSame technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
EUVD-2026-35208
GHSA-v8jq-hgg9-hg9v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB