Skip to main content

ClearPass OnGuard EUVDEUVD-2026-93900

| CVE-2026-79814 MEDIUM
External Control of File Name or Path (CWE-73)
2026-10-06 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-hj73-xc58-6r33
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local authenticated access to OnGuard host
  2. Exploit
    Trigger arbitrary file write via agent
  3. Execution
    Overwrite file executed with elevated privileges
  4. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as elevated user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling File name/path control
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to be a local, authenticated user on a system running the ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent (PR:L, AV:L) and requires user interaction (UI:R). Critically, HPE states success depends on 'certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control' being met, and the attack is high-complexity (AC:H), meaning it cannot be triggered on demand against an arbitrary default install - the specific environmental conditions are not enumerated by the vendor. These factors - local access, required interaction, attacker-uncontrolled preconditions, and high complexity - substantially limit real-world exploitability, confining impact to hosts where the OnGuard agent is deployed and the unspecified preconditions already exist.

Impact

This is a moderate, defense-in-depth-tier issue rather than an urgent emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R) confirms three independent brakes on exploitation: the attacker must already be a local, authenticated user on the host running the ClearPass OnGuard agent (PR:L), the attack is high-complexity (AC:H) because, per the HPE description, 'certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control' must be met, and user interaction is required (UI:R). The scope is unchanged (S:U) but impact is high across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) because success yields arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges - a full local privilege escalation. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or SSVC decision point was provided in the input, and no public exploit code is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the 'RCE' tag reflects the local code-execution outcome, not remote reachability. Weighing the signals: the high impact is offset by local access, high attack complexity, and attacker-uncontrolled preconditions, which is why the vendor base score lands at 6.7 (Medium) rather than Critical. Treat this as a patch-in-normal-cycle privilege-escalation bug unless telemetry shows local attacker presence on ClearPass-managed endpoints. Note that no EPSS or KEV data was supplied, so widespread-exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from the provided intelligence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local user already logged into a system running the ClearPass OnGuard agent abuses the arbitrary file write flaw to plant or overwrite a file that is later executed in a higher-privilege context, gaining elevated code execution. Exploitation only succeeds when environment-specific preconditions outside the attacker's control are already present and typically requires user interaction, so it is opportunistic rather than reliable. No public exploit code is referenced in the available intelligence.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Local privilege escalation in ClearPass OnGuard allows an authenticated local user to write arbitrary files and potentially execute code with elevated privileges, but only when unspecified preconditions outside the attacker's control are met. The vulnerability requires user interaction and is high-complexity (AC:H), limiting practical exploitability to hosts where the OnGuard agent is deployed and those environmental conditions already exist. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis; the issue is assessed as moderate and defense-in-depth-tier.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or exact fix version was identified in the available data; check the HPE advisory at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05158en_us&docLocale=en_US for the latest update and any patched agent releases. Until a fix is applied, reduce exposure by restricting local interactive access to the OnGuard host to only trusted users (trade-off: may hinder legitimate local administration), ensuring the agent runs with the minimum necessary privileges, and monitoring or alerting on unexpected file writes by OnGuard processes to system directories (trade-off: potential false positives and performance overhead). If the agent's local elevation can be disabled or its privileged helper constrained without breaking policy enforcement, consider that as a temporary compensating control, but validate against business requirements first. Additionally, apply the principle of least privilege to all local accounts to limit the impact of any successful exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.14.0 ≤6.14.0
ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.11.0 ≤6.11.15

Affected Packages

euvd clearpass_policy_manager_cppm no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent is an endpoint compliance and network access control component that runs locally on managed hosts and often operates with elevated privileges to enforce policy. An arbitrary file write flaw in the agent allows a local authenticated user to place files in privileged locations, which can then be leveraged to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. The root cause is an unspecified file write weakness (CWE not provided) that is gated by environmental preconditions outside the attacker's control, explaining the high attack complexity (AC:H). This is not a remotely reachable issue; it requires local access (AV:L), an existing low-privileged account (PR:L), and some form of user interaction (UI:R). No CPE strings or specific library/protocol details were included in the available intelligence.

Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Local agent abuse by an authenticated user (AV:L/PR:L); attacker-uncontrolled preconditions and required interaction give AC:H/UI:R; privilege escalation to code execution yields C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

An arbitrary file write vulnerability in the ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent could allow malicious users on a local instance to elevate their user privileges if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges on the affected system.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise NAC posture agent, common in large networks but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

More in Hpe

View all
CVE-2017-5689 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 02

An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana

CVE-2016-7434 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 13

The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf

CVE-2026-76708 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En

CVE-2024-53676 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 27

A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution

CVE-2022-37932 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 12

A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S

CVE-2020-7136 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 30

A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access

CVE-2025-37097 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 01

A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service

CVE-2019-8936 HIGH POC
7.5 May 15

NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2017-6458 HIGH
8.8 Mar 27

Multiple buffer overflows in the ctl_put* functions in NTP before 4.2.8p10 and 4.3.x before 4.3.94 allow remote authenti

CVE-2026-23600 CRITICAL
10.0 Mar 02

Remote authentication bypass in HPE AutoPass License Server (APLS) allows unauthenticated network attackers to circumven

CVE-2026-76674 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 15

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways running firmware in the 9.4.x,

CVE-2026-76670 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 15

Privilege escalation in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator (builds 9.4.0 through 9.4.10, 9.5.0 through 9.5.8

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy