Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain on-path network position (MITM/rogue AP)
-
DeliveryVictim transmits cookie over HTTP
-
ExploitIntercept session identifier lacking Secure flag
-
ExecutionReplay cookie to hijack session
-
ImpactAccess sensitive session data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A02:2025 - Security Misconfiguration
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Secure cookie flag
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires three concrete conditions: (1) the victim must have an authenticated iControl session so that a session identifier cookie exists; (2) that cookie must actually be transmitted over an unencrypted HTTP connection (the Missing Secure attribute only matters when traffic traverses HTTP rather than being forced to HTTPS); and (3) the attacker must occupy an on-path/man-in-the-middle network position (shared LAN, rogue Wi-Fi AP, ARP spoofing, or compromised intermediary) to intercept the plaintext traffic. Limiting factors: deployments that enforce HTTPS/HSTS end-to-end are not exploitable, exploitation is passive-capture only (confidentiality, C:L, no integrity or availability impact), and the required on-path position accounts for the AC:H rating. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the signals are consistent in that direction. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 3.1 (LOW) with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - high attack complexity, low confidentiality impact only, no integrity or availability impact. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept were provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The AC:H rating reflects that exploitation is not trivial: it requires an attacker to already occupy an on-path/man-in-the-middle position on the network and for the victim's session cookie to actually traverse an unencrypted HTTP connection. One data point to verify with the vendor: the vendor assigned PR:L (privileges required) but a Missing Secure Attribute cookie-interception flaw is typically a passive on-path capture requiring no attacker authentication - PR:N with user interaction (UI:R, victim must use HTTP) models the mechanism more faithfully. This discrepancy does not change the LOW severity tier materially. Overall this is a legitimate hardening/defense-in-depth defect, not an urgent remediation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned on the same network segment as a victim (e.g., shared Wi-Fi, rogue access point, or a compromised router) passively sniffs traffic while the victim's browser transmits an iControl session cookie over a plaintext HTTP connection because the cookie lacks the Secure attribute. The attacker captures the session identifier and replays it to hijack the authenticated session. No public exploit code was identified, and exploitation depends on the attacker achieving an on-path position and the session actually being carried over HTTP. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026
Session cookie interception in HCL iControl allows an on-path attacker to capture sensitive information such as session identifiers when the Secure attribute is missing and cookies are transmitted over unencrypted HTTP. Exploitation requires a victim with an authenticated session, transmission of the cookie over HTTP, and the attacker to occupy a man-in-the-middle position; no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified. This is a low-priority information disclosure issue (CVSS 3.1) with confidentiality-only impact.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor's guidance from the HCL advisory (KB0133940) to set the Secure attribute on all session cookies and enforce HTTPS end-to-end. As a compensating control until patched, configure the web server to redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS and enable HSTS; this may break clients that rely on HTTP, so phase in carefully. Additionally, restrict network access to trusted segments and avoid using unencrypted HTTP for authenticated sessions. No specific patch version is provided in the available data, so consult the advisory for updates.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is CWE-614 (Sensitive Cookie in HTTPS Session Without 'Secure' Attribute) affecting HCL Software iControl (all versions per CPE 2.3:a:hcl_software:icontrol:*). Session cookies lacking the Secure flag may be sent by the browser over plain HTTP if the application does not enforce HTTPS, allowing an attacker on the network path to intercept them. The attack requires the victim to have an authenticated session and to transmit the cookie over HTTP, and the attacker must be positioned on-path (e.g., shared LAN, rogue Wi-Fi, ARP spoofing). The assessed CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) reflects the high complexity of the on-path requirement and user interaction needed for HTTP transmission. End-to-end HTTPS/HSTS enforcement eliminates the issue.
Know when Icontrol gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
On-path MITM position plus a plaintext HTTP transmission drives AC:H; interception is passive so PR:N, but it needs the victim to use HTTP (UI:R); only session-identifier confidentiality is exposed (C:L).
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
iControl is affected by a Missing Secure Attribute vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to intercept cookies transmitted over unencrypted HTTP connections, enabling the unauthorized extraction of sensitive information such as session identifiers.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Reflected cross-site scripting and CSV formula injection in HCL iControl 4.0.0 let a remote attacker embed unsanitized i
Broken access control in HCL iControl (CVSS 3.1 score 8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) allows a low-privileged
HCL iControl's web interface fails to automatically expire user sessions after inactivity, leaving authenticated session
Missing HTTP security response headers in HCL iControl fail to instruct client browsers to engage their built-in XSS fil
Weak input validation in HCL iControl allows authenticated remote attackers to submit input of an unexpected type, resul
Stack trace disclosure in HCL iControl v4.0.0 exposes internal application details to authenticated remote attackers via
HCL iControl exposes session cookies without the Secure or SameSite attributes set, and with the cookie path scoped to r
Insecure cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) configuration in HCL iControl allows an attacker-controlled website to iss
Insufficient session expiration in HCL iControl allows anyone who reaches a legitimate user's still-valid session to ope
Improper error handling in HCL iControl causes verbose database and system error output to be returned to whoever trigge
EUVD-2026-90816
GHSA-qxqf-pp67-v58v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB