Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS EUVDEUVD-2026-75799

| CVE-2026-78571 HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-09-10 ibm GHSA-qfhm-pm4r-cjpm
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege Langflow account
  2. Delivery
    Craft workflow node with eval()-injectable expression
  3. Exploit
    Submit crafted input via UI or API
  4. Execution
    Server evaluates attacker expression without sanitization
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary OS commands under Langflow process identity
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate credentials, API keys, or pivot to internal network

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session with at least low-privilege access to the IBM Langflow OSS instance (PR:L per CVSS vector). The attacker must be able to supply input to the code path containing the unguarded eval() - most likely through workflow node configuration, expression fields, or a custom component definition within the Langflow UI or API. No user interaction from a victim is required (UI:N). Exploitation is limited by: (1) requirement for a valid account - prevents fully unauthenticated external attacks; (2) the Langflow instance must be network-reachable from the attacker (AV:N satisfied only if the service is exposed); (3) affected versions are 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 - patched deployments are not affected. Deployments restricted to internal networks with tightly controlled account provisioning have materially reduced exposure.

Impact

The CVSS 8.8 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects the primary risk factors: the attack is fully network-reachable, requires no complexity, demands only a low-privilege account, and yields full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact on the host running the Langflow service. The scope is unchanged (S:U), indicating the exploit does not inherently escape to adjacent systems, though code execution on an AI orchestration server typically grants access to API keys, model endpoints, and downstream datastores. EPSS data is not provided; no KEV listing exists and no public POC has been identified, so real-world exploitation likelihood is currently unconfirmed. The primary risk amplifier is deployment context: Langflow instances that are internet-exposed and allow self-registration (or where attacker-controlled accounts can be provisioned) elevate this from an insider/post-auth threat to a near-external one. Organizations running Langflow behind strict access control with audited accounts face materially lower near-term risk. No conflicting signals are present in the available data.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a valid low-privilege Langflow account (e.g., a shared workspace member or a self-registered user on a public-facing deployment) crafts a workflow node or expression input that embeds Python commands - such as subprocess calls - in the value passed to the unguarded eval(). Upon executing the workflow or triggering the evaluation endpoint, the server executes the injected code under the Langflow process identity, granting full access to the host filesystem, environment variables (including API keys and model credentials), and internal network resources. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the technique is well-understood and trivially constructed against any unguarded eval().

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows authenticated network attackers to run arbitrary operating system commands by supplying crafted input to an unguarded eval() call within the application. The root cause is CWE-94 code injection - attacker-controlled data is passed directly to a dynamic evaluation function without sanitization or sandboxing. IBM has released a patch and no public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the straightforward nature of eval()-based injection and the low privilege bar (any authenticated user) make this a meaningful post-authentication escalation risk.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch documented at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666 - this is the primary and preferred remediation. The exact patched version number is not specified in available intelligence and must be confirmed from the IBM advisory directly before deploying. While awaiting patching, restrict Langflow access to a minimal, audited set of authenticated users and disable self-service account registration if enabled, since the vulnerability requires a valid low-privilege account. Consider placing the Langflow instance behind a VPN or IP allowlist to prevent internet-exposed exploitation. Network egress filtering on the Langflow host can limit post-exploitation impact (e.g., blocking outbound connections to attacker infrastructure) but does not prevent code execution itself. Audit existing authenticated user accounts and review Langflow audit logs for anomalous workflow or node execution patterns.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.11.5

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM Langflow OSS is IBM's distribution of the open-source Langflow low-code AI workflow builder, widely used to construct and serve large-language-model pipelines and agents. The affected range spans versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5, identified under CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The vulnerability class is CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / Code Injection): somewhere in the application's workflow execution or component evaluation logic, a Python eval() (or equivalent dynamic execution primitive) processes a value derived from user-supplied input without interposing a sandbox, allow-list, or AST-level validation. Because Langflow is designed to let users define and execute data-processing nodes - some of which invoke Python expressions - the attack surface for unguarded eval() is architecturally broad in this product category.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable service, low-complexity eval() injection, requires only a valid low-privilege account, full host impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an unguarded eval() call on attacker-controlled input.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.11.5 is vulnerable to authenticated remote code execution, enabling any application user to execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of the application server. Organizations deploying these versions face risk of unauthorized system access, data exfiltration, and supply-chain compromise through compromised or rogue user accounts, requiring immediate patch deployment.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 56% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source AI workflow tool, growing LLM-pipeline deployments
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-93680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy