Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege Langflow account
-
DeliveryCraft workflow node with eval()-injectable expression
-
ExploitSubmit crafted input via UI or API
-
ExecutionServer evaluates attacker expression without sanitization
-
PersistExecute arbitrary OS commands under Langflow process identity
-
ImpactExfiltrate credentials, API keys, or pivot to internal network
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session with at least low-privilege access to the IBM Langflow OSS instance (PR:L per CVSS vector). The attacker must be able to supply input to the code path containing the unguarded eval() - most likely through workflow node configuration, expression fields, or a custom component definition within the Langflow UI or API. No user interaction from a victim is required (UI:N). Exploitation is limited by: (1) requirement for a valid account - prevents fully unauthenticated external attacks; (2) the Langflow instance must be network-reachable from the attacker (AV:N satisfied only if the service is exposed); (3) affected versions are 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 - patched deployments are not affected. Deployments restricted to internal networks with tightly controlled account provisioning have materially reduced exposure. |
| Impact | The CVSS 8.8 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately reflects the primary risk factors: the attack is fully network-reachable, requires no complexity, demands only a low-privilege account, and yields full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact on the host running the Langflow service. The scope is unchanged (S:U), indicating the exploit does not inherently escape to adjacent systems, though code execution on an AI orchestration server typically grants access to API keys, model endpoints, and downstream datastores. EPSS data is not provided; no KEV listing exists and no public POC has been identified, so real-world exploitation likelihood is currently unconfirmed. The primary risk amplifier is deployment context: Langflow instances that are internet-exposed and allow self-registration (or where attacker-controlled accounts can be provisioned) elevate this from an insider/post-auth threat to a near-external one. Organizations running Langflow behind strict access control with audited accounts face materially lower near-term risk. No conflicting signals are present in the available data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a valid low-privilege Langflow account (e.g., a shared workspace member or a self-registered user on a public-facing deployment) crafts a workflow node or expression input that embeds Python commands - such as subprocess calls - in the value passed to the unguarded eval(). Upon executing the workflow or triggering the evaluation endpoint, the server executes the injected code under the Langflow process identity, granting full access to the host filesystem, environment variables (including API keys and model credentials), and internal network resources. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the technique is well-understood and trivially constructed against any unguarded eval(). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows authenticated network attackers to run arbitrary operating system commands by supplying crafted input to an unguarded eval() call within the application. The root cause is CWE-94 code injection - attacker-controlled data is passed directly to a dynamic evaluation function without sanitization or sandboxing. IBM has released a patch and no public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the straightforward nature of eval()-based injection and the low privilege bar (any authenticated user) make this a meaningful post-authentication escalation risk.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch documented at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666 - this is the primary and preferred remediation. The exact patched version number is not specified in available intelligence and must be confirmed from the IBM advisory directly before deploying. While awaiting patching, restrict Langflow access to a minimal, audited set of authenticated users and disable self-service account registration if enabled, since the vulnerability requires a valid low-privilege account. Consider placing the Langflow instance behind a VPN or IP allowlist to prevent internet-exposed exploitation. Network egress filtering on the Langflow host can limit post-exploitation impact (e.g., blocking outbound connections to attacker infrastructure) but does not prevent code execution itself. Audit existing authenticated user accounts and review Langflow audit logs for anomalous workflow or node execution patterns.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM Langflow OSS is IBM's distribution of the open-source Langflow low-code AI workflow builder, widely used to construct and serve large-language-model pipelines and agents. The affected range spans versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5, identified under CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The vulnerability class is CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / Code Injection): somewhere in the application's workflow execution or component evaluation logic, a Python eval() (or equivalent dynamic execution primitive) processes a value derived from user-supplied input without interposing a sandbox, allow-list, or AST-level validation. Because Langflow is designed to let users define and execute data-processing nodes - some of which invoke Python expressions - the attack surface for unguarded eval() is architecturally broad in this product category.
Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable service, low-complexity eval() injection, requires only a valid low-privilege account, full host impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an unguarded eval() call on attacker-controlled input.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.11.5 is vulnerable to authenticated remote code execution, enabling any application user to execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of the application server. Organizations deploying these versions face risk of unauthorized system access, data exfiltration, and supply-chain compromise through compromised or rogue user accounts, requiring immediate patch deployment.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
More in Langflow Oss
View allUnauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac
Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr
Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary
Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run
Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper
Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r
EUVD-2026-75799
GHSA-qfhm-pm4r-cjpm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB