Skip to main content

libtiff EUVDEUVD-2026-65144

| CVE-2026-52490 CRITICAL
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-08-24 mitre GHSA-6qm2-q5vx-rh4c
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious TIFF or options
  2. Delivery
    Deliver to tiffcrop-based pipeline
  3. Exploit
    tiffcrop invokes process_command_opts()
  4. Execution
    Corrupt option/argument handling
  5. Persist
    Hijack control flow
  6. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code in tool context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the vulnerable tiffcrop tool actually be invoked on attacker-influenced input - either a crafted TIFF file or attacker-controlled command-line options reaching process_command_opts() in tools/tiffcrop.c. This limits realistic exploitation to environments that run tiffcrop against untrusted data (e.g., automated image-conversion services or scripts), and implies local/tool-invocation access rather than the remote no-interaction exploitation the published AV:N/UI:N vector suggests - that mismatch should be resolved with the maintainer. There is no indication of authentication being required, but a user or service must execute tiffcrop for the bug to trigger.

Impact

The signals conflict sharply and should temper the headline 9.8. The published CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes remote, unauthenticated, no-interaction network exploitation, but the actual sink - process_command_opts() in the tiffcrop CLI - parses command-line options for a locally invoked tool, which is inherently local and requires a user to run tiffcrop against attacker-controlled input; the network vector is almost certainly overstated and should be verified against the vendor/GitLab work item. Against that, EPSS is very low (0.16%, 5th percentile) and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, so there is no indication of mass exploitation, though a referenced gist suggests proof-of-concept code may be circulating. Net assessment: a genuine memory-safety/code-execution bug worth patching in any environment that runs tiffcrop in automated image pipelines, but its real-world priority is moderate rather than the emergency implied by the raw CVSS - treat it as a standard patch-cycle item unless tiffcrop is exposed to untrusted files in an automated workflow.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker supplies a maliciously crafted TIFF file (or manipulates the arguments/options passed to tiffcrop in an automated conversion service) such that process_command_opts() mishandles the input and diverts execution to attacker-controlled code. In a batch image-processing pipeline that invokes tiffcrop on user-uploaded files, this yields code execution in the pipeline's context. Proof-of-concept material appears to be referenced via a public gist, lowering the barrier to reproduction.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 25, 2026

Arbitrary code execution in libtiff's tiffcrop utility (commit 85f2ac8e) stems from the process_command_opts() function in tools/tiffcrop.c, classified as CWE-94 code injection. An attacker who can influence the input processed by tiffcrop can trigger execution of arbitrary code. Publicly referenced proof-of-concept material appears to exist via a linked gist, but the flaw is not in CISA KEV and EPSS is low (0.16%, 5th percentile), indicating no evidence of widespread active exploitation.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patched version is identified in the available data, and the fix is tracked upstream via the libtiff GitLab work item (https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/work_items/846) - monitor that item and rebuild from the fixed commit or the next tagged libtiff release once published; do not deploy an unverified version number. As compensating controls until a fixed build is available: avoid running tiffcrop on untrusted or externally supplied TIFF files and remove tiffcrop from any unattended/automated processing pipeline (trade-off: loss of crop/split automation); if tiffcrop must run on untrusted input, sandbox it with restricted privileges (e.g., a seccomp/AppArmor confinement or container with no network and a non-privileged user) to contain any code execution (trade-off: added operational complexity). Validate remediation against NVD (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52490) and VulDB (https://vuldb.com/vuln/394834).

Affected VersionsENISA

n/a n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

libtiff is the de facto reference library for reading and writing TIFF images, and it ships a set of command-line tools including tiffcrop, which crops, splits, and reorganizes TIFF pages. The defect is in process_command_opts() in tools/tiffcrop.c, the routine that parses tiffcrop's invocation options before processing image data. CWE-94 (code injection / improper control of code generation) is the assigned root-cause class, though for a C-based image tool the practical manifestation is typically memory corruption in option/parameter handling leading to control-flow hijack rather than interpreted-language injection. The CPE string is a placeholder (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) and provides no usable product/version boundaries.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

tiffcrop is a locally run CLI parsing attacker-supplied input, so AV:L and UI:R; successful code execution yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 7.3 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat 7.3 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Aug 25, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
9.8 (CRITICAL)
CVE Published
Aug 24, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Aug 24, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.8

DescriptionCVE.org

An issue in libtiff 85f2ac8e0b01cb7db2bbecf4a3b891bdbef67938 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the process_command_opts() function in tools/tiffcrop.c

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical code injection vulnerability in libtiff's tiffcrop image processing utility (CVE-2026-52490, CVSS 9.8) enables arbitrary code execution when processing attacker-supplied TIFF files. However, active exploitation remains extremely limited (EPSS 0.2%, not in CISA KEV), materially reducing immediate organizational risk. Organizations that process external or user-supplied TIFF files face the highest exposure and require immediate compensating controls.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Sandbox tiffcrop execution in an isolated process or container with minimal system privileges; restrict input to tiffcrop exclusively to pre-validated internal TIFF sources; disable or remove the tiffcrop utility from systems where it is not essential; implement enhanced monitoring and alerting for abnormal behavior or system calls originating from image processing workloads.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
High
libtiff is a ubiquitous image library, but vulnerable tiffcrop CLI is used narrowly
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment MSRC Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 Not-Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy