Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network vector, high complexity due to required broker control; no confidentiality or integrity impact confirmed beyond potential memory disclosure and resource allocation abuse.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client
Lifecycle Timeline
3Blast Radius
ecosystem impact- 4 maven packages depend on com.rabbitmq:amqp-client (3 direct, 1 indirect)
Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 5.33.0.
DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
The max body size was enforced to patch CVE-2023-46120, but even though that limit still works, the frame size itself still exceeds the given max size.
Root cause
The Java client records the AMQP 0-9-1 frame_max negotiated during connection tuning, but the socket inbound frame reader continues to validate broker-controlled payload lengths against the much larger maxInboundMessageBodySize limit. A broker peer can therefore send a method frame whose payload is larger than the negotiated frame_max, have it allocated and decoded, and complete the connection handshake instead of being rejected as a protocol violation.
*Reported by Team Atlanta.*
AnalysisAI
RabbitMQ Java client (amqp-client) versions prior to 5.33.0 fails to enforce the AMQP 0-9-1 negotiated frame_max limit on inbound socket frames, allowing a malicious or compromised broker peer to send method frames exceeding the protocol-negotiated size. The client allocates and fully decodes these oversized frames rather than rejecting them as protocol violations, effectively nullifying the frame-size protection. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires an attacker to control the AMQP broker endpoint that the vulnerable Java client connects to - through deployment of a rogue broker, compromise of an existing broker, or a man-in-the-middle position on the AMQP TCP connection (typically port 5672 or 5671 for TLS). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | Real-world risk is moderate and highly context-dependent. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | Full exploit scenario with step-by-step reproduction available after sign-in. |
| Remediation | Upgrade com.rabbitmq:amqp-client to version 5.33.0 or later, which enforces the negotiated frame_max as a hard cap on inbound frame payload sizes for both socket and Netty transport handlers. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m
Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti
Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent
Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up
The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow
Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla
The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during
Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allSame technique Information Disclosure
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-61046
GHSA-5xwg-cfvj-gff5