Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach exposed IBM i network service
-
DeliverySend crafted overflowing input
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory and hijack control flow
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), no authentication, user interaction, or special client-side conditions are required, and the platform default is that IBM i network services are reachable - this points to remote unauthenticated exploitation against network-exposed IBM i systems. The key limiting factor is that neither IBM's description nor the CPE identifies the specific vulnerable service, port, subsystem, or configuration, so exploitation in practice depends on that (as-yet-unnamed) component actually being enabled and network-reachable; systems whose IBM i network services are firewalled off or segmented from untrusted networks are not remotely reachable. CISA SSVC also rates the flaw as not automatable, indicating it is unlikely to be exploitable at scale without target-specific effort. |
| Impact | Signals here conflict and should be weighed together rather than acting on the 9.8 alone. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) describes a worst-case network-reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity RCE with total impact, which on paper is a drop-everything patch. However, EPSS is low (0.37%, 30th percentile), no public exploit is identified, and CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation status as none, automatable as no, and technical impact as total - meaning the impact is severe if exploited but there is no current evidence of active or easily-scaled exploitation. The most likely reading is a genuinely dangerous but not-yet-weaponized flaw where the practical difficulty is that the advisory does not disclose which IBM i service is vulnerable, so defenders cannot yet reason about real-world reachability; any operator running an internet- or partner-exposed IBM i partition should treat this as urgent and patch promptly, while air-gapped or tightly network-segmented deployments have more breathing room. Because the vulnerable component is unnamed, the AV:N assumption that the flaw is reachable over the network should be verified against IBM's advisory before deprioritizing based on the low EPSS. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network access to an exposed IBM i service sends specially crafted input that overflows an internal buffer, overwriting memory to hijack execution and run arbitrary code on the system without any credentials or user interaction. No public proof-of-concept is currently identified, so an attacker would need to independently discover the reachable vulnerable component and develop a working overflow, consistent with the low-complexity but not-automatable SSVC rating. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Aug 17, 2026
Remote code execution in IBM i (formerly OS/400) releases 7.3 through 7.6 stems from a buffer overflow (out-of-bounds write) that a remote, unauthenticated attacker can trigger to run arbitrary code on the host. IBM has published a fix, and while the CVSS base score is 9.8, there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS estimates exploitation probability at only 0.37% (30th percentile). CISA's SSVC framing rates exploitation as none and the vulnerability as not automatable, tempering the raw-score urgency.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Remote code execution in IBM i versions 7.3 through 7.6 is possible via a network-accessible buffer overflow (CWE-787) that requires no authentication or user interaction. An unauthenticated remote attacker who satisfies the high-complexity exploit prerequisites can trigger an out-of-bounds write, potentially corrupting memory control structures to redirect execution and achieve full system compromise across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. IBM has released a patch via their support portal; no public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fix IBM provides at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283578 for your specific IBM i release (7.3, 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6); the exact PTF/fix level is not disclosed in the input data and should be read directly from that IBM support page. Because the vulnerable service is not named in the advisory, effective compensating controls until patching is complete include restricting network reachability of the IBM i partition - place it behind a firewall and limit inbound access to known-good management and application hosts, and disable or block any IBM i network services (for example unused TCP servers under the Host Servers / TCP/IP configuration) that are not required, accepting that this may interrupt client/server or remote-management connectivity for legitimate users. Given SSVC rates exploitation as none, prioritized patching plus network segmentation is a reasonable interim posture rather than emergency isolation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM i is IBM's integrated midrange operating platform (the AS/400 / iSeries lineage) running on Power hardware, widely used for transactional business workloads. The flaw is classified as CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write): the affected component writes past the bounds of an allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory. When attacker-controlled data drives that overflow, it can overwrite control data or code pointers and redirect execution, which is the mechanism behind the reported arbitrary-code-execution impact. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the IBM i product itself as affected, but neither the description nor the CPE narrows the vulnerability to a specific service, port, or subsystem within the OS.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vendor-described remote unauthenticated buffer-overflow RCE with no user interaction gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N and full C/I/A impact; scope unchanged as code runs within the OS.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionNVD
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
Executive ViewAI
IBM i systems running versions 7.3-7.6 are vulnerable to remote code execution attacks that could grant attackers complete control over business-critical systems and data access without authentication. Organizations running these versions must prioritize patching to prevent potential breach, data loss, and operational disruption.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
EUVD-2026-58237
GHSA-433h-8f97-gmmv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB