Skip to main content

Bouncy Castle Java EUVDEUVD-2026-52138

| CVE-2026-12860 HIGH
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-08-03 bcorg GHSA-cggx-vw4r-j93f
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: bcorg
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft NULL-omitted DigestInfo with last two hash bytes altered
  2. Delivery
    Generate RSA signature over forged DigestInfo structure
  3. Exploit
    Submit forged signature to Bouncy Castle verification endpoint
  4. Execution
    Off-by-two loop skips final two hash bytes
  5. Persist
    Forged signature accepted as valid
  6. Impact
    Integrity bypass achieved

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target application uses Bouncy Castle's RSADigestSigner for RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification AND that the signer or signing library producing the signatures being verified uses the legacy NULL-omitted AlgorithmIdentifier encoding in DigestInfo (rather than the RFC 8017-compliant NULL-present encoding). The vulnerability is entirely absent from the strict NULL-present DigestInfo path (the common case), which uses a full constant-time array comparison. Additionally, if the system property org.bouncycastle.pkcs1.strict_digestinfo is set to true, the NULL-omitted form is rejected outright and this path is never reached. Exploitation is further constrained to contexts where an attacker can supply arbitrary signatures for verification - such as JWT token submission, TLS client certificate presentation, or application-layer RSA signature acceptance - limiting risk to exposed verification endpoints or services.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VI:H reflects unauthenticated remote exploitation with high integrity impact and no confidentiality or availability impact. The AT:N designation in the supplied vector implies no special attack requirements, though the vulnerability is only reachable via the NULL-omitted DigestInfo code path, which is not the default in all contexts - an independent assessment would place this at AT:P. No EPSS data or CISA KEV listing is provided in the source data. The CVE tags include 'Jwt Attack', signaling particular risk for applications using Bouncy Castle to verify RSA-signed JWTs, where a forged token could allow unauthorized authentication or privilege escalation. The public patch commit at ea5970ea9b2fb91d763b904692fd21089ca3e396 includes a runnable test that demonstrates exactly how to craft the forged DigestInfo structure, making practical exploit development straightforward for a knowledgeable attacker. Overall this is a high real-world priority for any organization using Bouncy Castle for RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification in security-critical flows, particularly JWT and certificate handling.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker targets a Java application using Bouncy Castle to verify RSA-signed JWTs. The attacker computes the SHA-256 hash of their target message, flips the final two hash bytes, encodes this in a NULL-omitted DigestInfo structure, and generates an RSA signature over the forged structure. When submitted, the Bouncy Castle verifier's loop exits two bytes early, misses the altered bytes, and accepts the forged signature - granting the attacker a valid token accepted by the server.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 03, 2026

RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature forgery is possible in Bouncy Castle for Java (bc-java before 1.85, bc-lts-java before 2.73.12) when the DigestInfo encoding omits the NULL AlgorithmIdentifier parameter. The off-by-two bytes in the RSADigestSigner comparison loop allows any forged signature whose DigestInfo matches all bytes except the final two of the message hash to pass verification as valid, achieving a high-integrity bypass. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the public patch commit includes a step-by-step test demonstrating the exact forgery technique, substantially lowering the bar to exploitation.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Bouncy Castle for Java (bc-java) to version 1.85 or later, or Bouncy Castle for Java LTS (bc-lts-java) to version 2.73.12 or later, as documented in the vendor advisory at https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE-2026-12860 and fixed in commit https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/ea5970ea9b2fb91d763b904692fd21089ca3e396. As a pre-patch workaround, set the JVM system property org.bouncycastle.pkcs1.strict_digestinfo=true to reject the NULL-omitted DigestInfo form entirely; this may break interoperability with legacy clients or non-compliant signing implementations that produce NULL-omitted structures. Applications that can enforce signature verification through the strict NULL-present path at the application level should do so as an interim measure. Review any use of RSADigestSigner in JWT validation, certificate processing, or code-signing workflows for immediate prioritization.

Affected VersionsENISA

BC-JAVA 0 <1.85
BC-LTS-JAVA 2.73.0 <2.73.12

Affected Packages

euvd bc_java fix: 1.85
euvd bc_lts_java fix: 2.73.12

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw resides in RSADigestSigner.verifySignature() in the Bouncy Castle core cryptography module (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:legion_of_the_bouncy_castle_inc.:bc-java and cpe:2.3:a:legion_of_the_bouncy_castle_inc.:bc-lts-java). The root cause is CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature). RFC 8017 section 9.2 requires the AlgorithmIdentifier within DigestInfo to include a NULL parameter, but Bouncy Castle also accepted a legacy NULL-omitted form for compatibility. In that lenient path, the comparison loop iterated exactly hash.length times, covering only the raw hash bytes without including the two-byte OCTET STRING header (tag 0x04 and length byte) that precedes them in the ASN.1 encoding. This meant the final two bytes of the hash were never compared. The fix extends the loop to hash.length + 2, covering the full trailing OCTET STRING. The strict NULL-present DigestInfo path (the common case, using constant-time array comparison) and applications using the org.bouncycastle.pkcs1.strict_digestinfo system property were never affected, as the release notes explicitly confirm.

Know when Java gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (bcorg) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Amber
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Network-reachable forgery, no auth required, but AC:H because the NULL-omitted DigestInfo code path must be active in the target application.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Red Hat 7.5 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (bcorg).

CVSS VectorVendor: bcorg

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, RSA PKCS#1 verification skips last two hash bytes in NULL-omitted path. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Bouncy Castle for Java's RSA signature verification contains a flaw allowing attackers to forge digital signatures, compromising integrity of digitally signed transactions and communications. All dependent applications require immediate patching to prevent unauthorized impersonation and fraudulent signature acceptance.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 93% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely-used Java cryptography library, common dependency in enterprise Java and Android applications
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD 🇯🇵JVN NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in Java

View all
CVE-2012-4681 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 28

Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m

CVE-2015-7450 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 02

Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti

CVE-2013-2465 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 18

Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent

CVE-2011-3544 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 19

Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug

CVE-2010-1871 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 05

JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to

CVE-2012-1723 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up

CVE-2013-0422 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 10

Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using

CVE-2012-0507 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 07

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up

CVE-2015-4852 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 18

The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers

CVE-2012-5076 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 16

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow

CVE-2017-3066 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 27

Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla

CVE-2012-0391 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 08

The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
openSUSE Leap 16.0 Fixed
openSUSE Tumbleweed Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy