Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity token forgery with total impact; I assess S:U (9.8) as the defensible base since impact stays within the gateway's authority, while multi-tenant setups justify the vendor's S:C 10.0.
Primary rating from Vendor (WSO2).
CVSS VectorVendor: WSO2
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
The JWT authentication mechanism accepts tokens signed with algorithms other than those explicitly configured or supported. This allows an attacker to craft a JWT with an unsupported algorithm, which is then incorrectly validated, leading to unauthorized access.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may result in unauthorized access to the system, including the potential compromise of administrative accounts and full account takeover. The CVSS score is adjusted to 9.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) in single-tenant deployments, reflecting that the impact is contained within a single security authority boundary.
AnalysisAI
Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane, and the Carbon API Manager REST API Utility) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to forge JWT tokens because the authentication layer accepts tokens signed with algorithms outside the explicitly configured/supported set. By crafting a JWT with an unsupported or attacker-chosen algorithm that is then incorrectly validated, an attacker can gain unauthorized access up to full administrative account takeover. Rated CVSS 10.0 (scope-changed) by WSO2, with the description noting a contained 9.8 score for single-tenant deployments; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
Technical ContextAI
The flaw is a JWT signature-verification weakness classified as CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature). JWTs carry an 'alg' header that dictates how the signature is checked; a secure verifier must pin verification to an explicit allowlist of algorithms and keys. Here the WSO2 authentication mechanism honors algorithms other than those configured/supported, meaning an attacker can select an algorithm the server should reject but instead processes - the classic JWT algorithm-confusion pattern (e.g., 'none', or substituting symmetric HMAC verification using a public key as the secret, or otherwise coercing weak/unintended verification). The affected CPEs are wso2:wso2_api_manager, wso2:wso2_universal_gateway, wso2:wso2_traffic_manager, wso2:wso2_api_control_plane, and wso2:wso2_carbon_api_manager_rest_api_utility - the API gateway/management stack that sits at the front door of API traffic and enforces token-based authentication for northbound and management APIs.
RemediationAI
Apply the fix described in the WSO2 security advisory WSO2-2026-5328 (https://security.docs.wso2.com/en/latest/security-announcements/security-advisories/2026/WSO2-2026-5328/) for each deployed component - the provided data does not include a specific patched version string, so this is a patch-available-per-vendor-advisory situation and operators should install the exact update level (WUM/product update) WSO2 specifies for their release train rather than an invented version number. As compensating controls until patched, restrict network exposure of the gateway management and admin REST APIs to trusted networks or a bastion (reducing the reachable attack surface for administrative takeover, at the cost of remote-admin convenience), and where feasible enforce JWT validation policy that pins the accepted signing algorithm(s) and keys at an upstream proxy/WAF so tokens with unexpected 'alg' values are rejected before reaching WSO2 (this only helps if the proxy itself validates strictly and may break legitimate integrations relying on multiple algorithms). Also rotate any signing keys and audit recent authentications for anomalous tokens, since a forged-token bypass may not appear as a failed login.
More in Jwt Attack
View allWhy is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update
Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke
Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT
A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti
A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27
A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work
The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), t
cosign is a container signing and verification utility. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote
Biscuit is an authentication and authorization token for microservices architectures. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8)
Same technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-53822
GHSA-j7vh-5w8q-4m4x