Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttain MITM position on registry network path
-
DeliveryIntercept client package download request
-
ExploitSubstitute tampered package payload in response
-
ExecutionBypass cryptographic signature verification (fails open)
-
ImpactMalicious package installed in Elastic Stack environment
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to occupy a network position capable of intercepting traffic between the Elastic client and the Elastic Package Registry (adversary-in-the-middle), OR to directly control or influence the content served by a self-hosted registry instance - for example, through compromise of the hosting server or storage backend. Exploitation is not feasible against clients consuming the official Elastic-hosted registry over an uncompromised TLS connection with valid certificate chain. The CVSS AC:H designation reflects this positional requirement. SSVC classifies the attack as non-automatable, confirming it requires deliberate, targeted effort rather than opportunistic mass scanning. No authentication is required once the network position is established; the flaw is in package integrity verification, not access control. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N scores 5.9 (Medium), reflecting that exploitation demands a high-complexity precondition - specifically, a network interception capability or control over a self-hosted registry. EPSS at 0.02% (6th percentile) confirms very low observed exploitation probability in the wild. SSVC further classifies exploitation as none, automatable as no, and technical impact as partial, all consistent with a constrained but meaningful supply-chain risk. No KEV listing and no public POC exist. The real-world priority is elevated specifically for organizations running self-hosted Elastic Package Registry instances in environments where MITM is plausible (e.g., shared or untrusted network segments, compromised TLS termination). Organizations consuming only the official Elastic-hosted registry over standard HTTPS without network interception face materially lower risk. There is no conflict between data sources; all signals converge on a credible but non-widespread threat. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a MITM position on the network path between a Kibana or Elastic client and a self-hosted Elastic Package Registry intercepts a legitimate package download request and substitutes a crafted, malicious package in the response stream. Because the registry client's signature check fails open under this CWE-347 flaw, the tampered package is accepted and installed, potentially enabling code execution or data exfiltration within the Elastic Stack environment. No public POC is available, but the attack concept is well-understood within supply-chain security research. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 24, 2026
Cryptographic signature verification bypass in Elastic Package Registry versions 0.1.0 through 1.37.0 allows an adversary-in-the-middle, or an attacker with influence over a self-hosted registry's served content, to substitute tampered packages that are accepted without triggering integrity check failures. The flaw (CWE-347) undermines supply-chain integrity for organizations running self-hosted registry instances. No active exploitation is confirmed (SSVC: exploitation none; EPSS 0.02%), but the high integrity impact and zero-privilege-required vector make patching to 1.38.0 a priority for self-hosted deployments.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Elastic Package Registry to version 1.38.0, which resolves the signature verification flaw per the vendor advisory at https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-package-registry-1-38-0-security-update-esa-2026-27/386081. Note: the fix version 1.38.0 is inferred from the advisory thread title and should be confirmed against the official release notes prior to deployment. For organizations unable to upgrade immediately, restrict network access to the self-hosted registry to explicitly trusted client hosts using firewall rules or network segmentation, reducing MITM exposure - this adds operational overhead and does not address the root cause. Additionally, enforcing mutual TLS between registry clients and the server can reduce the feasibility of traffic interception, though this requires client-side certificate management. Neither compensating control remediates the underlying signature verification flaw.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in go, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Elastic Package Registry is the distribution layer for Elastic Stack integration packages - it serves packages consumed by Kibana and related tooling, making it a supply-chain trust anchor. CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature) indicates the registry's package integrity check fails open rather than closed: when a tampered package is presented, the signature validation does not correctly reject it. The tags reference 'Jwt Attack', suggesting the signature mechanism may be JWT-based or token-based, which is consistent with improper verification of a signed assertion rather than a traditional asymmetric code-signing scheme. The full CPE cpe:2.3:a:elastic:elastic_package_registry:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* spans all versions up to 1.37.0, with EUVD-2026-26140 bounding the range explicitly at 0.1.0-1.37.0.
Know when Elastic Package Registry gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Network attack vector with AC:H for required MITM position; PR:N as no credentials needed; I:H for unchecked package substitution; C:N and A:N as no data disclosure or service disruption results.
Primary rating from Vendor (elastic).
CVSS VectorVendor: elastic
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) in Elastic Package Registry could allow an attacker positioned to intercept network traffic, or to otherwise influence the contents served to a self-hosted registry, to substitute a tampered package without the integrity check failing closed.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Same technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-26140
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB