Skip to main content

Elastic Package Registry CVE-2026-33467

| EUVDEUVD-2026-26140 MEDIUM
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-04-28 security@elastic.co
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: elastic
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attain MITM position on registry network path
  2. Delivery
    Intercept client package download request
  3. Exploit
    Substitute tampered package payload in response
  4. Execution
    Bypass cryptographic signature verification (fails open)
  5. Impact
    Malicious package installed in Elastic Stack environment

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to occupy a network position capable of intercepting traffic between the Elastic client and the Elastic Package Registry (adversary-in-the-middle), OR to directly control or influence the content served by a self-hosted registry instance - for example, through compromise of the hosting server or storage backend. Exploitation is not feasible against clients consuming the official Elastic-hosted registry over an uncompromised TLS connection with valid certificate chain. The CVSS AC:H designation reflects this positional requirement. SSVC classifies the attack as non-automatable, confirming it requires deliberate, targeted effort rather than opportunistic mass scanning. No authentication is required once the network position is established; the flaw is in package integrity verification, not access control.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N scores 5.9 (Medium), reflecting that exploitation demands a high-complexity precondition - specifically, a network interception capability or control over a self-hosted registry. EPSS at 0.02% (6th percentile) confirms very low observed exploitation probability in the wild. SSVC further classifies exploitation as none, automatable as no, and technical impact as partial, all consistent with a constrained but meaningful supply-chain risk. No KEV listing and no public POC exist. The real-world priority is elevated specifically for organizations running self-hosted Elastic Package Registry instances in environments where MITM is plausible (e.g., shared or untrusted network segments, compromised TLS termination). Organizations consuming only the official Elastic-hosted registry over standard HTTPS without network interception face materially lower risk. There is no conflict between data sources; all signals converge on a credible but non-widespread threat.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a MITM position on the network path between a Kibana or Elastic client and a self-hosted Elastic Package Registry intercepts a legitimate package download request and substitutes a crafted, malicious package in the response stream. Because the registry client's signature check fails open under this CWE-347 flaw, the tampered package is accepted and installed, potentially enabling code execution or data exfiltration within the Elastic Stack environment. No public POC is available, but the attack concept is well-understood within supply-chain security research.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 24, 2026

Cryptographic signature verification bypass in Elastic Package Registry versions 0.1.0 through 1.37.0 allows an adversary-in-the-middle, or an attacker with influence over a self-hosted registry's served content, to substitute tampered packages that are accepted without triggering integrity check failures. The flaw (CWE-347) undermines supply-chain integrity for organizations running self-hosted registry instances. No active exploitation is confirmed (SSVC: exploitation none; EPSS 0.02%), but the high integrity impact and zero-privilege-required vector make patching to 1.38.0 a priority for self-hosted deployments.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Elastic Package Registry to version 1.38.0, which resolves the signature verification flaw per the vendor advisory at https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-package-registry-1-38-0-security-update-esa-2026-27/386081. Note: the fix version 1.38.0 is inferred from the advisory thread title and should be confirmed against the official release notes prior to deployment. For organizations unable to upgrade immediately, restrict network access to the self-hosted registry to explicitly trusted client hosts using firewall rules or network segmentation, reducing MITM exposure - this adds operational overhead and does not address the root cause. Additionally, enforcing mutual TLS between registry clients and the server can reduce the feasibility of traffic interception, though this requires client-side certificate management. Neither compensating control remediates the underlying signature verification flaw.

Affected VersionsENISA

Elastic Package Registry 0.1.0 ≤1.37.0

Affected Packages

go github.com/elastic/package-registry fix: 1.38.0
euvd elastic_package_registry no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in go, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Elastic Package Registry is the distribution layer for Elastic Stack integration packages - it serves packages consumed by Kibana and related tooling, making it a supply-chain trust anchor. CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature) indicates the registry's package integrity check fails open rather than closed: when a tampered package is presented, the signature validation does not correctly reject it. The tags reference 'Jwt Attack', suggesting the signature mechanism may be JWT-based or token-based, which is consistent with improper verification of a signed assertion rather than a traditional asymmetric code-signing scheme. The full CPE cpe:2.3:a:elastic:elastic_package_registry:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* spans all versions up to 1.37.0, with EUVD-2026-26140 bounding the range explicitly at 0.1.0-1.37.0.

Know when Elastic Package Registry gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (elastic) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Network attack vector with AC:H for required MITM position; PR:N as no credentials needed; I:H for unchecked package substitution; C:N and A:N as no data disclosure or service disruption results.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (elastic).

CVSS VectorVendor: elastic

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) in Elastic Package Registry could allow an attacker positioned to intercept network traffic, or to otherwise influence the contents served to a self-hosted registry, to substitute a tampered package without the integrity check failing closed.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 94% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche Elastic Stack component, primarily self-hosted enterprise deployments
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 Affected
openSUSE Leap 15.5 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy