Skip to main content

Juniper Junos OS EUVDEUVD-2026-101479

| CVE-2026-101992 HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-2qg7-r2pq-p9x6
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Establish or compromise configured BGP peer
  2. Exploit
    Craft malformed BGP VPLS signaling update
  3. Execution
    Trigger improper input validation in rpd
  4. Impact
    Crash rpd and disrupt routing (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved device be running the BGP routing protocol with VPLS signaling enabled, and that the attacker be a CONFIGURED BGP peer of that device - meaning an established peering/trust relationship must already exist. The malicious trigger is a crafted BGP VPLS signaling update sent over that session. Limiting factors: the adjacent attack vector (AV:A) and the configured-peer prerequisite confine exploitation to devices that peer with the attacker (e.g. a malicious, misconfigured, or compromised peer), so devices with no VPLS signaling configuration or no untrusted BGP peers are not exposed; impact is limited to denial of service (rpd crash) with no confidentiality or integrity loss.

Impact

This is a genuine but bounded operational risk rather than an urgent emergency. The Juniper-assigned CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) scores 7.1 and reflects a pure availability impact (VA:H, with SA:L on subsequent systems; VC/VI/VA for confidentiality and integrity are N). The adjacent attack vector (AV:A) is the single most important limiter: exploitation is not internet-wide but requires the attacker to already be a configured BGP peer of the target, i.e. a pre-existing routing trust relationship. No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. No SSVC decision record was provided. The signals are internally consistent - a high-but-not-critical score, availability-only impact, and a trust-gated attack surface - so this reads as a real patch-management priority for operators running BGP VPLS signaling with external or lower-trust peers, but not a drop-everything issue for networks without that exposure. One nuance to verify: although CVSS marks PR:N (no system authentication), the description's 'configured BGP peer' prerequisite is a meaningful real-world access barrier not captured by the base metrics.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who controls or has compromised a device that is an established BGP peer of a Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved router sends a malformed BGP VPLS signaling update across the session. The improper input validation in the rpd process causes rpd to crash, disrupting routing on the target until the daemon restarts. No public proof-of-concept is known, and the adjacent (AV:A) vector means the attacker must already sit in the BGP peering relationship.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv3 – Oct 14, 2026

A malformed BGP VPLS signaling update can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, causing a denial of service on the affected device. The flaw is improper input validation (CWE-20) in rpd's handling of BGP signaling messages; the attack vector is adjacent and the CVSS 4.0 vector carries PR:N (no privileges required), but successful exploitation requires the target to be running BGP with VPLS signaling configured and to already have an established peering relationship with the attacking peer. Impact is limited to availability (rpd restart, routing churn, potential traffic loss) with no confidentiality or integrity impact; no public exploit code has been identified and there is no KEV confirmation of active exploitation at time of analysis, so this is a genuine but bounded operational risk rather than an urgent emergency.

Earlier versions of this analysis (2)
v2 Oct 14, 2026 - 18:01 cvss changed CVSS 7.1

Crafted BGP VPLS signaling updates sent by a configured BGP peer can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, resulting in a denial of service. The improper input validation flaw (CWE-20) has a CVSS 4.0 score of 7.1 (CVSS 3.1: 7.1, AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), reflecting an adjacent, unauthenticated attack that requires an established BGP peering session with VPLS signaling enabled. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) is identified at time of analysis; impact is limited to availability (rpd restart) with no data exposure or modification.

v1 Oct 14, 2026 - 17:08 CVSS 6.5

Crashing the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible via a crafted BGP VPLS signaling update sent by an established BGP peer, causing a denial-of-service condition (CVSS 6.5, availability-only). The CVSS vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) indicates adjacent network access and no privileges required, though the attacker must already occupy a trusted BGP adjacency as a configured peer. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; a vendor advisory (JSA112187) is available.

RemediationAI

Apply the fixed Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved releases listed in Juniper's advisory JSA112187 (https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187); the exact patched version numbers are not enumerated in the provided data, so consult that advisory for the release train matching your platform before scheduling an upgrade, and note that rpd restarts during upgrade will cause a brief routing interruption. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, the most direct compensating control is to stop feeding the vulnerable parser: remove BGP-based VPLS signaling from affected routing instances (for example by disabling or de-configuring the l2vpn signaling family on the relevant BGP groups), accepting that this breaks VPLS auto-discovery and L2 VPN service until the upgrade is done. A second option is to harden the peering surface by enforcing BGP peer authentication (TCP-MD5 or TCP-AO) and filtering BGP on the loopback interface so only explicitly authorized peer addresses can open a session, which raises the bar for a spoofed or rogue peer but does not protect against a legitimately configured peer that is itself compromised or misbehaving. Operators should also consider rate-limiting BGP updates and logging/monitoring rpd restarts (core dumps, SNMP traps, syslog 'rpd' crashes) to detect an attempted or successful trigger, and should treat any unexpected rpd termination correlated with a BGP peer as a potential exploitation event requiring peer review or temporary session shutdown.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 0 <23.2R2-S7.7-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 0 <23.2R2-S7.7
Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Junos OS routes BGP through the routing protocol daemon (rpd), a privileged process that parses BGP UPDATE messages and their path attributes, including the L2VPN address family used for VPLS auto-discovery and signaling. In a VPLS deployment, BGP carries NLRI that identifies VPLS instances along with associated label blocks, route targets and next-hop information; a peer that is configured for the l2vpn signaling family can therefore send structured data that rpd must validate field by field. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) describes the root cause: rpd fails to correctly validate one or more fields in an incoming BGP VPLS signaling update, and the unvalidated input drives the process into a fault that terminates rpd. Because rpd is the control-plane core of Junos, its crash disrupts routing and any service dependent on it, but the defect is a crash condition rather than memory corruption that has been shown to yield code execution, so the assessed impact is availability-only (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). The CPE data identifies the affected platforms as juniper_networks:junos_os and juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved (both recorded with wildcard versions, indicating the advisory's affected release list must be consulted for exact ranges).

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 7.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Adjacent BGP session gives AV:A; no system auth needed once peered so PR:N (though a configured-peer trust relationship is required); impact is availability-only (A:H), with no confidentiality or integrity effect.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
Severity Changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM) 7.1 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:31 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

An Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) process of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a configured BGP peer to cause an rpd crash via a BGP VPLS signaling update.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved contain a high-severity input validation flaw in the routing protocol daemon that can cause a denial of service when processing malformed BGP VPLS signaling messages, disrupting routing and potentially causing traffic loss. Organizations with BGP VPLS signaling configured and established peering sessions are affected, but exploitation requires an existing peer relationship and no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified. Leadership should prioritize mitigation for critical network segments while treating this as a bounded operational risk.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict BGP peering to trusted peers, disable VPLS signaling where not required, apply ACLs to limit BGP traffic to known peers, and monitor rpd for crashes.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Juniper Junos OS is widely deployed enterprise and carrier networking equipment
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy