Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessEstablish or compromise configured BGP peer
-
ExploitCraft malformed BGP VPLS signaling update
-
ExecutionTrigger improper input validation in rpd
-
ImpactCrash rpd and disrupt routing (DoS)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved device be running the BGP routing protocol with VPLS signaling enabled, and that the attacker be a CONFIGURED BGP peer of that device - meaning an established peering/trust relationship must already exist. The malicious trigger is a crafted BGP VPLS signaling update sent over that session. Limiting factors: the adjacent attack vector (AV:A) and the configured-peer prerequisite confine exploitation to devices that peer with the attacker (e.g. a malicious, misconfigured, or compromised peer), so devices with no VPLS signaling configuration or no untrusted BGP peers are not exposed; impact is limited to denial of service (rpd crash) with no confidentiality or integrity loss. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but bounded operational risk rather than an urgent emergency. The Juniper-assigned CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) scores 7.1 and reflects a pure availability impact (VA:H, with SA:L on subsequent systems; VC/VI/VA for confidentiality and integrity are N). The adjacent attack vector (AV:A) is the single most important limiter: exploitation is not internet-wide but requires the attacker to already be a configured BGP peer of the target, i.e. a pre-existing routing trust relationship. No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. No SSVC decision record was provided. The signals are internally consistent - a high-but-not-critical score, availability-only impact, and a trust-gated attack surface - so this reads as a real patch-management priority for operators running BGP VPLS signaling with external or lower-trust peers, but not a drop-everything issue for networks without that exposure. One nuance to verify: although CVSS marks PR:N (no system authentication), the description's 'configured BGP peer' prerequisite is a meaningful real-world access barrier not captured by the base metrics. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who controls or has compromised a device that is an established BGP peer of a Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved router sends a malformed BGP VPLS signaling update across the session. The improper input validation in the rpd process causes rpd to crash, disrupting routing on the target until the daemon restarts. No public proof-of-concept is known, and the adjacent (AV:A) vector means the attacker must already sit in the BGP peering relationship. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv3 – Oct 14, 2026
A malformed BGP VPLS signaling update can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, causing a denial of service on the affected device. The flaw is improper input validation (CWE-20) in rpd's handling of BGP signaling messages; the attack vector is adjacent and the CVSS 4.0 vector carries PR:N (no privileges required), but successful exploitation requires the target to be running BGP with VPLS signaling configured and to already have an established peering relationship with the attacking peer. Impact is limited to availability (rpd restart, routing churn, potential traffic loss) with no confidentiality or integrity impact; no public exploit code has been identified and there is no KEV confirmation of active exploitation at time of analysis, so this is a genuine but bounded operational risk rather than an urgent emergency.
Earlier versions of this analysis (2)
Crafted BGP VPLS signaling updates sent by a configured BGP peer can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, resulting in a denial of service. The improper input validation flaw (CWE-20) has a CVSS 4.0 score of 7.1 (CVSS 3.1: 7.1, AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), reflecting an adjacent, unauthenticated attack that requires an established BGP peering session with VPLS signaling enabled. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) is identified at time of analysis; impact is limited to availability (rpd restart) with no data exposure or modification.
Crashing the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible via a crafted BGP VPLS signaling update sent by an established BGP peer, causing a denial-of-service condition (CVSS 6.5, availability-only). The CVSS vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) indicates adjacent network access and no privileges required, though the attacker must already occupy a trusted BGP adjacency as a configured peer. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; a vendor advisory (JSA112187) is available.
RemediationAI
Apply the fixed Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved releases listed in Juniper's advisory JSA112187 (https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187); the exact patched version numbers are not enumerated in the provided data, so consult that advisory for the release train matching your platform before scheduling an upgrade, and note that rpd restarts during upgrade will cause a brief routing interruption. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, the most direct compensating control is to stop feeding the vulnerable parser: remove BGP-based VPLS signaling from affected routing instances (for example by disabling or de-configuring the l2vpn signaling family on the relevant BGP groups), accepting that this breaks VPLS auto-discovery and L2 VPN service until the upgrade is done. A second option is to harden the peering surface by enforcing BGP peer authentication (TCP-MD5 or TCP-AO) and filtering BGP on the loopback interface so only explicitly authorized peer addresses can open a session, which raises the bar for a spoofed or rogue peer but does not protect against a legitimately configured peer that is itself compromised or misbehaving. Operators should also consider rate-limiting BGP updates and logging/monitoring rpd restarts (core dumps, SNMP traps, syslog 'rpd' crashes) to detect an attempted or successful trigger, and should treat any unexpected rpd termination correlated with a BGP peer as a potential exploitation event requiring peer review or temporary session shutdown.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Junos OS routes BGP through the routing protocol daemon (rpd), a privileged process that parses BGP UPDATE messages and their path attributes, including the L2VPN address family used for VPLS auto-discovery and signaling. In a VPLS deployment, BGP carries NLRI that identifies VPLS instances along with associated label blocks, route targets and next-hop information; a peer that is configured for the l2vpn signaling family can therefore send structured data that rpd must validate field by field. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) describes the root cause: rpd fails to correctly validate one or more fields in an incoming BGP VPLS signaling update, and the unvalidated input drives the process into a fault that terminates rpd. Because rpd is the control-plane core of Junos, its crash disrupts routing and any service dependent on it, but the defect is a crash condition rather than memory corruption that has been shown to yield code execution, so the assessed impact is availability-only (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). The CPE data identifies the affected platforms as juniper_networks:junos_os and juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved (both recorded with wildcard versions, indicating the advisory's affected release list must be consulted for exact ranges).
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
Adjacent BGP session gives AV:A; no system auth needed once peered so PR:N (though a configured-peer trust relationship is required); impact is availability-only (A:H), with no confidentiality or integrity effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
An Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) process of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a configured BGP peer to cause an rpd crash via a BGP VPLS signaling update.
Executive ViewAI
Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved contain a high-severity input validation flaw in the routing protocol daemon that can cause a denial of service when processing malformed BGP VPLS signaling messages, disrupting routing and potentially causing traffic loss. Organizations with BGP VPLS signaling configured and established peering sessions are affected, but exploitation requires an existing peer relationship and no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified. Leadership should prioritize mitigation for critical network segments while treating this as a bounded operational risk.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict BGP peering to trusted peers, disable VPLS signaling where not required, apply ACLs to limit BGP traffic to known peers, and monitor rpd for crashes.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
EUVD-2026-101479
GHSA-2qg7-r2pq-p9x6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB