Skip to main content

Junos OS EUVDEUVD-2026-101401

| CVE-2026-33789 CRITICAL
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-6wm5-v698-ppc6
9.2
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Establish or compromise a BGP peer session
  2. Delivery
    Enable/confirm BMP is active on target
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted BGP route updates
  4. Execution
    Overflow stack buffer in rpd daemon
  5. Persist
    Crash routing or execute code as root
  6. Impact
    Network-wide routing disruption

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two specific conditions stated in the advisory: (1) the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) feature must be enabled on the device, and (2) the attacker must be a BGP peer - i.e., have an established BGP session with the target, meaning a configured neighbor or a compromised/upstream peer rather than an arbitrary host. Limiting factors: BMP is not enabled in default configurations, and BGP sessions are normally established only with explicitly configured neighbors, so an attacker must occupy or compromise a peering position. No authentication beyond the BGP adjacency is required (PR:N). Affected releases span numerous Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved trains (e.g., below 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.4R2-S5, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2 and corresponding EVO builds); devices patched to the fixed versions are not exploitable.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue, not an inflated high-CVSS-but-low-risk case, though its exploitability is gated by real preconditions. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) scores 9.2 and reflects an unauthenticated, network-reachable flaw in the rpd routing daemon with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - consistent with the description's claim of denial of service plus potential root-level command execution. Two signals temper raw severity: the 4.0 'AT:P' (Attack Requirements: Present) metric encodes that exploitation is not against arbitrary targets but requires a specific condition - here, an established BGP peering relationship AND the BMP feature enabled - and the vector's AU:Y / R:A / V:C modifiers indicate user/automation interaction assumptions and a vulnerable, recoverable, concentrated condition. EPSS is not provided, KEV status is not listed (so NOT confirmed exploited), and no POC is referenced. The flaw is CWE-121 stack-based buffer overflow in an unauthenticated network parser, which historically trends toward exploitability, but 'potential root-level command execution' is stated as potential, not demonstrated. Net: patch urgently on devices where BMP is enabled and BGP peers are not fully trusted; the risk is real but conditional rather than ubiquitous drive-by exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

On a Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved device with BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) enabled, an attacker who controls or has compromised a BGP peer sends specially crafted BGP route updates that overflow a stack buffer in the rpd routing daemon. This crashes rpd (routing denial of service) and may allow root-level command execution on the device. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; exploitation requires an active BGP adjacency, so the attacker must be a configured/compromised neighbor rather than an arbitrary internet host.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Stack-based buffer overflow in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated BGP peer to cause a denial of service and potentially execute commands with root privileges via crafted BGP route updates when the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is enabled. Exploitation requires that BMP be explicitly enabled (not default) and that the attacker have an established BGP session, meaning a configured neighbor or compromised peer. No public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not known to be actively exploited; patched releases are available from Juniper.

RemediationAI

Juniper has released patches for this vulnerability. Upgrade to the fixed versions: Junos OS 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, or 26.2R1-S2 (or later); Junos OS Evolved 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, or 26.2R1-S2-EVO (or later); and for specific platforms, 25.2X100-D35-EVO and 25.4X300-D40-EVO. For Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100, no fixed version is listed; contact Juniper support for guidance. If patching is not immediately possible, disable the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) feature if it is not required-this removes the attack vector but loses BMP monitoring data. Additionally, restrict BGP peering to trusted neighbors and consider using BGP authentication (e.g., MD5 or TCP-AO) to reduce the risk of a compromised peer, though this does not eliminate the vulnerability. Refer to the vendor advisory at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187 for detailed instructions.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3
Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS 0 <23.2R2-S7.7
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 0 <23.2R2-S7.7-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability is a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved. rpd handles routing protocols including BGP, and when the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is enabled, it processes BMP messages that encapsulate BGP route updates. The overflow occurs when rpd parses crafted BGP route updates, likely due to insufficient bounds checking on a stack-allocated buffer. CWE-121 occurs when data written to a stack buffer exceeds its capacity, corrupting adjacent memory such as return addresses, which can lead to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the rpd process (typically root). The affected products are identified by CPE as cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved. BMP is a monitoring feature that is not enabled by default, and BGP sessions are established only with explicitly configured peers, which are prerequisites for exploitation. The vendor assigned a CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.2, while the independent assessment using CVSS 3.1 rates it as high severity with AC:H due to these prerequisites (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 9.2 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

AV:N and PR:N since an unauthenticated BGP peer triggers it remotely, but AC:H because exploitation depends on non-default BMP being enabled plus an established BGP adjacency; C/I/A:H reflect potential root code execution and rpd DoS.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
9.8 (CRITICAL) 9.2 (CRITICAL)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:58 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.2

DescriptionCVE.org

A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated BGP peer to cause a denial of service and potential root-level command execution via crafted BGP route updates when the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is enabled.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Juniper Networks has disclosed a critical flaw in the Junos routing daemon that could let a hostile or compromised BGP peer crash core routing services and, in the worst case, run commands with root privileges on carrier-grade and enterprise routers carrying production traffic. The affected surface is a subset of the Juniper fleet where BGP Monitoring Protocol has been deliberately turned on and where an external BGP session is already established, so externally exposed routing infrastructure and any peer relationships with lower-trust partners should be treated as the primary exposure. Because these devices sit in the path of customer and internal traffic, a successful attack could degrade or sever network connectivity and, if root access is obtained, hand an adversary deep control of the network fabric. The vendor has released fixes, and no public exploit or active exploitation has been observed, giving leadership a narrow window to remediate on a planned basis rather than under incident conditions.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 48% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Junos powers widely deployed enterprise and carrier routing/switching infrastructure
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy