Skip to main content
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

This vulnerability presents HIGH real-world risk across multiple dimensions: (1) CVSS 8.8 with network-adjacent attack vector (AV:A) and zero privilege requirements (PR:N) indicates significant exploitability; (2) the vulnerability affects critical infrastructure (EV charging networks), which are high-value targets; (3) lack of authentication requirement (UI:N) dramatically reduces attack complexity; (4) heap-based buffer overflow is reliably exploitable for RCE; (5) ZDI designation (ZDI-CAN-26327) indicates coordinated disclosure and likely POC development by security researchers. The AC:L (Low Complexity) rating confirms this is trivial to exploit once the message format is known. While specific EPSS and KEV status data were not provided, the combination of unauthenticated network access, infrastructure targeting, and RCE capability classify this as critical priority. This is NOT a high-CVSS-but-low-risk issue—this is a genuine critical vulnerability requiring immediate attention.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker on the same network segment as an Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial device crafts a malicious DLB_SlaveRegister message with a length field indicating a payload larger than the internal fixed-length heap buffer. Upon receipt, the device firmware copies this oversized payload without validation, triggering a heap buffer overflow. The attacker carefully structures the payload to overwrite heap metadata or adjacent function pointers, redirecting code execution to attacker-controlled shellcode. Since the attack vector is network-adjacent (AV:A) rather than network (AV:N), the attacker must be on the same network segment (e.g., same building's WiFi or wired network), or have compromised an intermediate network device. No authentication is required, making this exploitable by any network-adjacent device without credentials. The attacker gains complete code execution on the charging station, potentially disrupting EV charging services, exfiltrating payment or user data, or using the device as a pivot point for further network attacks. A proof-of-concept likely exists given the ZDI designation and researcher involvement.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 15, 2026

CVE-2025-5830 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers affecting the DLB_SlaveRegister message handler. Network-adjacent attackers can execute arbitrary code without authentication due to insufficient input validation on user-supplied data length before copying to a fixed-length buffer. This is a critical vulnerability affecting critical infrastructure (EV charging stations) with a CVSS score of 8.8 and high real-world exploitability due to the unauthenticated, network-adjacent attack vector.

Affected VersionsENISA

Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial 1.36.00

Affected Packages

euvd autel_maxicharger_ac_wallbox_commercial no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the DLB_SlaveRegister message processing logic within Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial firmware. The root cause is CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow), a classic memory safety issue where user-supplied message data is copied to a fixed-length heap buffer without prior length validation. This occurs in a network-accessible protocol handler, likely part of the device's management or diagnostic interface. The Modbus-like naming (DLB_SlaveRegister) suggests this may be related to industrial control protocol message handling. The heap allocation context makes exploitation potentially more reliable than stack overflows, as attackers can predict heap layout and craft payloads to overwrite adjacent heap metadata or function pointers. No specific CPE string was provided in the source data, but affected devices are identified as: Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial (model/version specifics would be found in vendor advisories).

Know when Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial DLB_SlaveRegister Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.

The specific flaw exists within the handling of DLB_SlaveRegister messages. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-26327.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability affects Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers, allowing attackers on the network to gain complete control of charging infrastructure without credentials. Organizations operating these devices face operational disruption, data breach, and potential supply chain compromise risks until remediation is available.

Recommended Action

Within 24 hours: Inventory all Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial installations and isolate affected devices to segregated network segments with restricted access. Within 7 days: Implement network-level controls (firewall rules, WAF blocking DLB_SlaveRegister traffic patterns) and disable remote management features if operationally feasible. Within 30 days: Monitor vendor advisories for patch availability and establish expedited deployment procedures; consider alternative charging vendor solutions for future procurement.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Implement network segmentation to restrict DLB_SlaveRegister protocol traffic; deploy intrusion detection signatures for malicious DLB_SlaveRegister message patterns; restrict device management interfaces to authorized networks only; disable remote administration capabilities if business operations permit; monitor device logs for unusual network connections or process execution; consider temporary service reduction on non-critical charging stations pending patch availability.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 78% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2025-5827 HIGH
8.8 Jun 25

CVE-2025-5827 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the ble_process_esp32_msg function of Autel MaxiCharger

CVE-2025-5822 HIGH
8.8 Jun 25

CVE-2025-5822 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial Technician API that

CVE-2024-23958 HIGH
8.8 Sep 28

Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE Hardcoded Credentials Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. Rated high severi

CVE-2024-23957 HIGH
8.8 Sep 28

Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 DLB_HostHeartBeat Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilit

CVE-2024-7795 HIGH
8.8 Aug 21

Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 AppAuthenExchangeRandomNum Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vul

CVE-2024-23967 HIGH
8.0 Sep 28

Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 WebSocket Base64 Decoding Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vuln

CVE-2024-23959 HIGH
8.0 Sep 28

Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnera

CVE-2025-6678 HIGH
7.5 Jun 25

CVE-2025-6678 is an unauthenticated remote information disclosure vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commerci

CVE-2025-5825 HIGH
7.5 Jun 25

CVE-2025-5825 is a firmware downgrade remote code execution vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial cha

CVE-2025-5824 HIGH
7.5 Jun 25

CVE-2025-5824 is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial that allows network-a

CVE-2025-5829 MEDIUM
6.8 Jun 25

Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial autocharge Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This

CVE-2025-5828 MEDIUM
6.8 Jun 25

Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial wLength Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy