Skip to main content

Progress LoadMaster CVE-2026-8037

| EUVDEUVD-2026-34260 CRITICAL
Command Injection (CWE-77)
2026-06-04 ProgressSoftware GHSA-57pc-jm9r-hgj4
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach appliance management API
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted request to command endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Inject shell metacharacters into unsanitized input
  4. Execution
    Shell executes arbitrary commands
  5. Impact
    Full appliance compromise and traffic interception

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network access to the appliance's management/command API endpoints (the 'multiple command endpoints' named in the description) - no authentication, no user interaction, and low complexity per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), so default configurations of internet- or network-exposed Progress ADC management APIs are directly exploitable. The main limiting factor is reachability: the attacker must be able to route to the management API, so appliances whose admin/API interface is confined to an isolated management network are not exposed to arbitrary remote attackers. Exploitation is also bounded to the affected firmware ranges (7.2.60.0-<7.2.63.2, and LoadMaster 7.2.45.12-<7.2.54.18); patched builds 7.2.63.2 and 7.2.54.18 remove the condition. SSVC 'Automatable: no' suggests the attack is not trivially wormable despite the public PoC.

Impact

Signals are strong on impact but mixed on imminence. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) describes the worst case: network-reachable, low-complexity, no authentication, no user interaction, with total compromise of the appliance - consistent with SSVC's 'Technical Impact: total.' Countering this, SSVC records 'Exploitation: none' and 'Automatable: no,' and EPSS is only 0.30% (54th percentile), indicating no evidence yet of widespread or automated exploitation. Publicly available exploit code (GitHub PoC) raises the practical risk above the EPSS figure, since a working PoC lowers the barrier to opportunistic attacks against internet-facing ADC appliances. Note a conflict to resolve: one reference is hosted under CIRCL's 'known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog' path, which could imply KEV-style listing, yet the input's SSVC exploitation status is 'none' and no explicit KEV=YES flag was provided - do not treat this as confirmed active exploitation without corroboration. Net: given a pre-auth RCE on a perimeter appliance with a public PoC, this warrants priority patching despite the low EPSS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach the appliance's management API over the network sends a crafted request to one of the vulnerable command endpoints, embedding shell metacharacters in an unsanitized parameter; the appliance passes the input to a shell and executes the attacker's commands as the API's privileged context, no credentials required. With total technical impact this yields full compromise of the ADC/load balancer, enabling interception of proxied traffic, pivoting, or persistence. A public proof-of-concept is available on GitHub (HORKimhab/CVE-2026-8037), lowering the effort to reproduce.

Emergency Immediate action required. Why: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited), no patch available.
Exploited in the wild (CISA KEV) No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv3 – Jul 13, 2026

Unauthenticated OS command injection in the API of Progress ADC products - LoadMaster, ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF - allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the appliance by supplying unsanitized input to multiple command endpoints. The flaw carries a CVSS of 9.8 (pre-auth, network-reachable) and publicly available exploit code exists (a GitHub PoC and watchTowr Labs write-up), though EPSS remains low at 0.30% and CISA SSVC currently rates exploitation status as 'none'. Fixed builds (7.2.63.2 and 7.2.54.18) are available from Progress.

Earlier versions of this analysis (2)
v2 Jul 13, 2026 - 19:29 cvss changed CVSS 9.8

Unauthenticated OS command injection enables pre-authentication remote code execution on Progress Kemp LoadMaster ADC appliances (and the shared-codebase ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF products) across firmware branches 7.2.45.x and 7.2.60.x. Multiple management-API command endpoints fail to sanitize attacker-supplied input, letting a remote attacker with no credentials run arbitrary OS commands with the appliance's privileges. Publicly available exploit code exists (GitHub PoC plus a watchTowr Labs technical write-up), though EPSS remains low at 0.30% and SSVC lists exploitation status as none.

v1 Jun 04, 2026 - 14:15 CVSS 9.6

Unauthenticated remote command execution in Progress LoadMaster and related ADC products (ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, MoveIt WAF) allows adjacent-network attackers to run arbitrary OS commands via unsanitized input in multiple API command endpoints. With a CVSS of 9.6 and scope change (S:C), successful exploitation grants attacker control over the appliance and any backed services. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the vendor has issued a critical security bulletin.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade LoadMaster and the related products to V7.2.63.2 (from the 7.2.60.0-7.2.63.2 branch) or to V7.2.54.18 (for LoadMaster on the 7.2.45.12-7.2.54.18 branch), per the Progress LoadMaster Critical Security Bulletin June 2026 (https://community.progress.com/s/article/LoadMaster-Critical-Security-Bulletin-June-2026-CVE-2026-8037-CVE-2026-33691). Because the vulnerability is in the management API, the primary compensating control until patching is to restrict network reachability of the API and administrative interface: place the management interface on an isolated/management VLAN and block API/admin ports from untrusted and internet-facing networks via ACLs or upstream firewall rules, accepting that legitimate remote administration must then originate from that trusted segment. Additionally restrict source IPs allowed to reach the affected command endpoints and monitor appliance logs for anomalous command-endpoint requests; note these are containment measures only and do not remediate the underlying injection, so patching remains mandatory.

Affected VersionsENISA

ECS Connections Manager V7.2.60.0 <V7.2.63.2
MOVEit WAF V7.2.60.0 <V7.2.63.2
Object Scale Connection Manager V7.2.60.0 <V7.2.63.2
LoadMaster V7.2.60.0 <V7.2.63.2
LoadMaster V7.2.45.12 <V7.2.54.18

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected products are Progress ADC (Application Delivery Controller) appliances - most notably Kemp/Progress LoadMaster, a hardware/virtual load balancer and reverse proxy - plus the related ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF, which share the same management/API codebase. The root cause is CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command, i.e. command injection): the appliance's management API passes attacker-controlled input from multiple command endpoints into an underlying OS shell without adequate sanitization, so shell metacharacters are interpreted rather than treated as literal data. The watchTowr Labs analysis referenced by NVD characterizes the bug as an uninitialized-heap issue leading to pre-auth RCE, suggesting the injection may be reachable via a memory-state/parsing defect in the API front-end - worth verifying against the vendor bulletin. Affected CPEs are progress_software:loadmaster, ecs_connections_manager, object_scale_connection_manager, and moveit_waf.

Know when Loadmaster gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Pre-auth command injection reachable over the network via the management API with no user interaction, granting full command execution, so AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N and C/I/A all High.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Added to CISA KEV
Aug 07, 2026 - 17:17 CISA
Analysis Updated
Jul 13, 2026 - 19:30 vuln.today
v3 - CVSS changed
Analysis Updated
Jul 13, 2026 - 19:29 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
CVSS changed
Jul 13, 2026 - 19:07 NVD
9.6 (CRITICAL) 9.8 (CRITICAL)

DescriptionNVD

OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an un-authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in multiple command endpoints

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Progress ADC products (LoadMaster, ECS Connections Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF) contain a critical unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-8037, CVSS 9.8) enabling remote code execution on network-facing appliances without authentication or user interaction. Organizations rely on these application delivery controllers for core network services; full appliance compromise enables lateral network access and operational disruption. Publicly available exploit code exists, making rapid patching essential.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Vendor-released patch: versions 7.2.63.2 and 7.2.54.18

Threat Intelligence Overview

Threat Score
5.0/10
Composite threat intelligence
EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 46% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely used enterprise ADC/load balancer, common but not ubiquitous
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV Yes
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited), no patch available
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

119
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: +50
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2024-1212 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 21

Unauthenticated remote attackers can access the system through the LoadMaster management interface, enabling arbitrary s

CVE-2024-7591 HIGH POC
7.2 Sep 05

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Progress LoadMaster allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects: * LoadMas

CVE-2024-8755 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 11

Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows : OS Command Injection.This

CVE-2024-2448 HIGH
8.8 Mar 22

An OS command injection vulnerability has been identified in LoadMaster. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerabil

CVE-2026-59686 HIGH
8.4 Jul 27

OS command injection in Progress LoadMaster, ECS Connection Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF all

CVE-2026-59688 HIGH
8.4 Jul 27

OS command injection in the backup-restore functionality of Progress Software LoadMaster, ECS Connection Manager, Object

CVE-2026-59687 HIGH
8.4 Jul 27

OS command injection in Progress LoadMaster and related products allows authenticated high-privilege attackers to execut

CVE-2024-56135 HIGH
8.4 Feb 05

Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows : OS Command Injection. Rate

CVE-2024-56131 HIGH
8.4 Feb 05

Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows : OS Command Injection. Rate

CVE-2025-13447 HIGH
8.4 Jan 13

OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress LoadMaster allows an authenticated attacker

CVE-2024-56132 HIGH
8.4 Feb 05

Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows : OS Command Injection. Rate

CVE-2024-56134 HIGH
8.4 Feb 05

Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows : OS Command Injection. Rate

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy