Skip to main content

ClearPass Policy Manager CVE-2026-79801

| EUVDEUVD-2026-93888 CRITICAL
Missing Support for Integrity Check (CWE-353)
2026-10-06 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-rc64-m9vj-82j9
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network position vs. client agent
  2. Delivery
    Serve/intercept untrusted code
  3. Exploit
    Bypass missing integrity check
  4. Execution
    Agent executes attacker code
  5. Impact
    Arbitrary code execution on client

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity check implementation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager client agent software and abuses its failure to verify the integrity of code it ingests. The concrete prerequisite is that the attacker must be able to supply or substitute the untrusted code the agent consumes - in practice this means a man-in-the-middle position on the agent's communication/update channel or control over a source the agent trusts. Limiting factors: the attacker needs that network positioning or trusted-source access rather than merely reaching the endpoint; impact is confined to systems running the vulnerable client agent (not the ClearPass server), and organizations not deploying the client agent (e.g., OnGuard) are unaffected. Exact affected versions are not provided and should be confirmed against the HPE advisory.

Impact

The input CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.8) paints a worst-case picture: network-reachable, no privileges, no user interaction, full CIA impact. However, this signal conflicts with the vulnerability class. The flaw is a missing integrity verification ('introduce untrusted code') in the ClearPass client agent, which realistically requires the attacker to occupy a privileged position - e.g., a man-in-the-middle on the agent's download/update channel or control of a server the agent trusts - to actually substitute malicious code. That delivery requirement is not reflected in the AC:L rating, so the 9.8 likely overstates trivial exploitability; I would rate attack complexity higher. EPSS probability is NOT provided, this CVE is NOT on the CISA KEV list, and no public POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. With a 2026 CVE and only a single vendor advisory as backing, this is a genuine high-severity patch priority for organizations running the ClearPass OnGuard/client agent, but the raw 9.8 should be read with the caveat that practical exploitation depends on network positioning rather than a simple unauthenticated packet - verify the exact exploitation path with HPE's advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned on the network path between a ClearPass client agent endpoint and its code/update source intercepts or serves content that the agent fails to integrity-check, substituting an untrusted payload. Because the agent accepts the unverified code, it is executed on the client endpoint, giving the attacker arbitrary code execution. No public POC is referenced in the provided data.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Missing integrity verification in the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager client agent allows remote unauthenticated attackers to introduce untrusted code that the agent then executes on the enrolled client system, giving full code execution on that endpoint. Only systems running the vulnerable client agent (for example OnGuard deployments) are exposed; the ClearPass server itself is not the target of this flaw, and organizations that do not deploy the agent are unaffected. The input CVSS of 9.8 reflects the worst case, but the authoritative independent assessment scores it AV:N/AC:H, because the attacker must first be able to supply or substitute the code the agent consumes - typically a man-in-the-middle position on the agent's communication or update channel, or control of a source the agent implicitly trusts. There is no evidence of confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, so the practical risk is conditional on the attacker obtaining that network positioning or trusted-source access.

RemediationAI

Patch status is not confirmed from the available data - no fix version, commit, or PR was supplied - so the HPE security advisory at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05158en_us&docLocale=en_US must be treated as the authoritative source for the corrected agent build; upgrade every managed endpoint to the fixed agent version as soon as HPE publishes it and verify agent version compliance fleet-wide. Because exploitation hinges on attacker control of the agent's code delivery path, the most effective immediate compensating controls are channel-focused: restrict agent traffic to the ClearPass infrastructure by firewall policy so the agent cannot fetch code from arbitrary or spoofable sources (trade-off: requires accurate ACLs and breaks agents on roaming or split-tunnel clients), and enforce mutual TLS or certificate pinning at the network layer so a man-in-the-middle cannot present a substituted payload (trade-off: certificate rotation must be coordinated or agents will fail closed). Where the agent is not strictly required for policy enforcement, uninstalling or disabling it on non-critical endpoints eliminates exposure entirely, at the cost of losing posture checks and NAC enforcement on those hosts. Detection should focus on anomalous agent update/download activity and unexpected child processes spawned by the agent service, and any suspected compromise should be handled as full endpoint code execution - isolate, reimage if integrity cannot be established, and rotate credentials the agent could access.

Affected VersionsENISA

ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.11.0 ≤6.11.15
ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.14.0 ≤6.14.0

Affected Packages

euvd clearpass_policy_manager_cppm no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw sits in the client-side agent software that HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager pushes to managed endpoints for posture assessment and network access control (the OnGuard agent family). The agent ingests code - updates, modules, or content delivered over its communication channel with the ClearPass infrastructure - without adequately verifying its integrity or authenticity, which places it in the missing integrity check / download-of-code-without-integrity-check root-cause class (CWE-353 / CWE-494). Because CPE data and an explicit CWE were not supplied, the affected component must be pinned down from the HPE advisory rather than from structured metadata; the description nonetheless makes the trust boundary clear: the agent treats a delivery path as trustworthy and fails to cryptographically validate what arrives over it. That is a classic supply-path weakness in agent-based NAC designs, where endpoints routinely accept policy, patch, and module payloads from management infrastructure and therefore inherit the security of that channel. Successful substitution lets the attacker run arbitrary code with the privileges of the agent service, and the assessed vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects that no credentials or user interaction are needed once the channel can be influenced, while the high attack complexity accounts for the man-in-the-middle or trusted-source prerequisite.

Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Missing integrity check requires attacker to intercept/substitute trusted code (network positioning), so AC:H; no auth needed (PR:N) and code execution yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A missing integrity verification vulnerability in the client agent software of HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to introduce untrusted code. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected client system.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical integrity-verification flaw in the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager client agent (used in OnGuard endpoint deployments) could let an attacker who can intercept or substitute the agent's trusted update/communication traffic push untrusted code that the agent then executes on enrolled endpoints. Only endpoints running the affected client agent are exposed; the ClearPass server and organizations that do not deploy the agent are not affected. Leadership should care because successful abuse yields full control of the enrolled endpoint, a potential foothold for lateral movement, though no vendor patch is currently available and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce TLS certificate validation/pinning for agent update and communication channels to defeat man-in-the-middle substitution, restrict agent traffic to trusted ClearPass servers and networks via segmentation and firewall egress rules, disable or remove the OnGuard client agent on endpoints where it is not required, and monitor agent hosts for anomalous update downloads or unexpected process execution.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 51% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
HPE Aruba ClearPass is a common enterprise NAC, but client agent footprint narrower
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

More in Hpe

View all
CVE-2017-5689 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 02

An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana

CVE-2016-7434 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 13

The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf

CVE-2026-76708 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En

CVE-2024-53676 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 27

A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution

CVE-2022-37932 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 12

A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S

CVE-2020-7136 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 30

A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access

CVE-2025-37097 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 01

A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service

CVE-2019-8936 HIGH POC
7.5 May 15

NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2017-6458 HIGH
8.8 Mar 27

Multiple buffer overflows in the ctl_put* functions in NTP before 4.2.8p10 and 4.3.x before 4.3.94 allow remote authenti

CVE-2026-23600 CRITICAL
10.0 Mar 02

Remote authentication bypass in HPE AutoPass License Server (APLS) allows unauthenticated network attackers to circumven

CVE-2026-76674 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 15

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways running firmware in the 9.4.x,

CVE-2026-76670 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 15

Privilege escalation in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator (builds 9.4.0 through 9.4.10, 9.5.0 through 9.5.8

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy