Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain network position vs. client agent
-
DeliveryServe/intercept untrusted code
-
ExploitBypass missing integrity check
-
ExecutionAgent executes attacker code
-
ImpactArbitrary code execution on client
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity check implementation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager client agent software and abuses its failure to verify the integrity of code it ingests. The concrete prerequisite is that the attacker must be able to supply or substitute the untrusted code the agent consumes - in practice this means a man-in-the-middle position on the agent's communication/update channel or control over a source the agent trusts. Limiting factors: the attacker needs that network positioning or trusted-source access rather than merely reaching the endpoint; impact is confined to systems running the vulnerable client agent (not the ClearPass server), and organizations not deploying the client agent (e.g., OnGuard) are unaffected. Exact affected versions are not provided and should be confirmed against the HPE advisory. |
| Impact | The input CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.8) paints a worst-case picture: network-reachable, no privileges, no user interaction, full CIA impact. However, this signal conflicts with the vulnerability class. The flaw is a missing integrity verification ('introduce untrusted code') in the ClearPass client agent, which realistically requires the attacker to occupy a privileged position - e.g., a man-in-the-middle on the agent's download/update channel or control of a server the agent trusts - to actually substitute malicious code. That delivery requirement is not reflected in the AC:L rating, so the 9.8 likely overstates trivial exploitability; I would rate attack complexity higher. EPSS probability is NOT provided, this CVE is NOT on the CISA KEV list, and no public POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. With a 2026 CVE and only a single vendor advisory as backing, this is a genuine high-severity patch priority for organizations running the ClearPass OnGuard/client agent, but the raw 9.8 should be read with the caveat that practical exploitation depends on network positioning rather than a simple unauthenticated packet - verify the exact exploitation path with HPE's advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned on the network path between a ClearPass client agent endpoint and its code/update source intercepts or serves content that the agent fails to integrity-check, substituting an untrusted payload. Because the agent accepts the unverified code, it is executed on the client endpoint, giving the attacker arbitrary code execution. No public POC is referenced in the provided data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Missing integrity verification in the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager client agent allows remote unauthenticated attackers to introduce untrusted code that the agent then executes on the enrolled client system, giving full code execution on that endpoint. Only systems running the vulnerable client agent (for example OnGuard deployments) are exposed; the ClearPass server itself is not the target of this flaw, and organizations that do not deploy the agent are unaffected. The input CVSS of 9.8 reflects the worst case, but the authoritative independent assessment scores it AV:N/AC:H, because the attacker must first be able to supply or substitute the code the agent consumes - typically a man-in-the-middle position on the agent's communication or update channel, or control of a source the agent implicitly trusts. There is no evidence of confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, so the practical risk is conditional on the attacker obtaining that network positioning or trusted-source access.
RemediationAI
Patch status is not confirmed from the available data - no fix version, commit, or PR was supplied - so the HPE security advisory at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05158en_us&docLocale=en_US must be treated as the authoritative source for the corrected agent build; upgrade every managed endpoint to the fixed agent version as soon as HPE publishes it and verify agent version compliance fleet-wide. Because exploitation hinges on attacker control of the agent's code delivery path, the most effective immediate compensating controls are channel-focused: restrict agent traffic to the ClearPass infrastructure by firewall policy so the agent cannot fetch code from arbitrary or spoofable sources (trade-off: requires accurate ACLs and breaks agents on roaming or split-tunnel clients), and enforce mutual TLS or certificate pinning at the network layer so a man-in-the-middle cannot present a substituted payload (trade-off: certificate rotation must be coordinated or agents will fail closed). Where the agent is not strictly required for policy enforcement, uninstalling or disabling it on non-critical endpoints eliminates exposure entirely, at the cost of losing posture checks and NAC enforcement on those hosts. Detection should focus on anomalous agent update/download activity and unexpected child processes spawned by the agent service, and any suspected compromise should be handled as full endpoint code execution - isolate, reimage if integrity cannot be established, and rotate credentials the agent could access.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw sits in the client-side agent software that HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager pushes to managed endpoints for posture assessment and network access control (the OnGuard agent family). The agent ingests code - updates, modules, or content delivered over its communication channel with the ClearPass infrastructure - without adequately verifying its integrity or authenticity, which places it in the missing integrity check / download-of-code-without-integrity-check root-cause class (CWE-353 / CWE-494). Because CPE data and an explicit CWE were not supplied, the affected component must be pinned down from the HPE advisory rather than from structured metadata; the description nonetheless makes the trust boundary clear: the agent treats a delivery path as trustworthy and fails to cryptographically validate what arrives over it. That is a classic supply-path weakness in agent-based NAC designs, where endpoints routinely accept policy, patch, and module payloads from management infrastructure and therefore inherit the security of that channel. Successful substitution lets the attacker run arbitrary code with the privileges of the agent service, and the assessed vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects that no credentials or user interaction are needed once the channel can be influenced, while the high attack complexity accounts for the man-in-the-middle or trusted-source prerequisite.
Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Missing integrity check requires attacker to intercept/substitute trusted code (network positioning), so AC:H; no auth needed (PR:N) and code execution yields full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).
CVSS VectorVendor: hpe
DescriptionCVE.org
A missing integrity verification vulnerability in the client agent software of HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to introduce untrusted code. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected client system.
Executive ViewAI
A critical integrity-verification flaw in the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager client agent (used in OnGuard endpoint deployments) could let an attacker who can intercept or substitute the agent's trusted update/communication traffic push untrusted code that the agent then executes on enrolled endpoints. Only endpoints running the affected client agent are exposed; the ClearPass server and organizations that do not deploy the agent are not affected. Leadership should care because successful abuse yields full control of the enrolled endpoint, a potential foothold for lateral movement, though no vendor patch is currently available and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce TLS certificate validation/pinning for agent update and communication channels to defeat man-in-the-middle substitution, restrict agent traffic to trusted ClearPass servers and networks via segmentation and firewall egress rules, disable or remove the OnGuard client agent on endpoints where it is not required, and monitor agent hosts for anomalous update downloads or unexpected process execution.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana
The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf
Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En
A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution
A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S
A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access
A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service
NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl
Multiple buffer overflows in the ctl_put* functions in NTP before 4.2.8p10 and 4.3.x before 4.3.94 allow remote authenti
Remote authentication bypass in HPE AutoPass License Server (APLS) allows unauthenticated network attackers to circumven
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways running firmware in the 9.4.x,
Privilege escalation in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator (builds 9.4.0 through 9.4.10, 9.5.0 through 9.5.8
EUVD-2026-93888
GHSA-rc64-m9vj-82j9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB