Skip to main content

ClearPass OnGuard CVE-2026-76751

| EUVDEUVD-2026-93878 CRITICAL
Missing Support for Integrity Check (CWE-353)
2026-10-06 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-rpmp-r6c2-r27x
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network/MITM position to agent's update channel
  2. Delivery
    Deliver tampered payload to OnGuard agent
  3. Exploit
    Agent skips integrity verification
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary code with elevated agent privileges
  5. Impact
    Full compromise of managed endpoint

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity check implementation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets endpoints running the ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent and abuses the agent's failure to verify the integrity/authenticity of content it processes. The realistic practical precondition is an attacker able to intercept, modify, or impersonate the data/update channel the agent trusts (adversary-in-the-middle or a rogue/compromised server), allowing delivery of an unverified malicious payload that then runs with the agent's elevated privileges. Limiting factors: the attacker must be able to reach and influence that trusted channel, and the target must have the OnGuard agent deployed and active; no user interaction or authentication is required per the vendor vector (PR:N/UI:N).

Impact

All vendor-provided signals point to high severity: CVSS 3.1 base score 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) describes an unauthenticated, network-reachable, low-complexity path to full confidentiality/integrity/availability compromise on the endpoint running the OnGuard agent. However, several decision signals are MISSING from the input: there is no EPSS probability, no CISA KEV entry, no SSVC decision data, and no public POC - so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' A key tension exists between the CVSS vector and the vulnerability class: 'missing integrity verification' flaws typically require an adversary-in-the-middle or malicious-server position to deliver the unverified payload, which usually raises attack complexity (AC:H) rather than the AC:L the vendor assigned - verify the precise trigger with HPE bulletin hpesbnw05158en_us. Net: this is a genuine high-priority patching item for ClearPass OnGuard-managed fleets given the RCE-with-elevated-privileges impact, but the absence of EPSS/KEV/POC evidence means there is currently no indication of active or widespread exploitation, so it is a 'patch promptly' item rather than an 'emergency, under attack' item.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned to intercept or impersonate the server/content that the ClearPass OnGuard endpoint agent trusts delivers a malicious payload that the agent fails to integrity-check before processing. Because the agent runs with elevated privileges, the unverified code executes at high privilege on the endpoint, giving the attacker control of the managed host. No public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Missing integrity verification in the HPE ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with the agent's elevated privileges on managed endpoints. In practice, exploitation requires the attacker to intercept, modify, or impersonate the data/update channel the agent trusts (e.g., adversary-in-the-middle or rogue server), meaning the vendor's low-complexity rating (CVSS 9.8) is tempered by this positioning requirement. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and there is no indication of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV).

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch as described in HPE advisory hpesbnw05158en_us; no specific fix version is given in the available data, so check the advisory for the exact patched release. As an interim compensating control, restrict outbound network traffic from OnGuard agents to only trusted ClearPass Policy Manager servers using host-based or network firewalls, and consider network segmentation to prevent adversary-in-the-middle positioning; the trade-off is that overly restrictive rules may block legitimate policy or software updates, requiring careful allowlisting. If the agent supports TLS certificate pinning or strict server identity validation, enable it; otherwise, monitor agent logs for unexpected process execution or unusual server communications. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, so immediate patching remains the primary recommendation.

Affected VersionsENISA

ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.11.0 ≤6.11.15
ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.14.0 ≤6.14.0

Affected Packages

euvd clearpass_policy_manager_cppm no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability stems from the OnGuard agent failing to verify the integrity or authenticity of content it processes, such as policy updates or configuration data. This omission, conceptually CWE-345 or CWE-494, lets an attacker who can influence the agent's trusted communication channel substitute malicious content that then executes with the agent's privileges, typically SYSTEM or root on the endpoint. The HPE ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent is endpoint software that enforces network access policies; because it runs with elevated rights, successful code execution yields full compromise of the endpoint (confidentiality, integrity, availability). The vendor CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) reflects a worst-case path, while the independent assessment rates complexity as high (AC:H) because the attacker must first achieve a man-in-the-middle or rogue-server position relative to the agent's update or data channel. No specific CPE identifiers or affected version ranges are provided in the available data; consult HPE advisory hpesbnw05158en_us.

Know when Hpe gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Unauthenticated network RCE with full endpoint impact, but 'missing integrity verification' typically needs an adversary-in-the-middle/malicious-server position, so AC:H rather than the vendor's AC:L.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A missing integrity verification vulnerability exists in the OnGuard agent of ClearPass Policy Manager. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected endpoint with the elevated privileges of the agent.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

HPE ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agents deployed on managed endpoints lack integrity verification of their trusted data/update channel, allowing an attacker who can intercept or impersonate that channel to execute arbitrary code with the agent's elevated privileges. This affects organizations relying on ClearPass for network access control, potentially enabling broad endpoint compromise and lateral movement. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, but the critical severity and lack of patch warrant immediate leadership attention to protect managed endpoints.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include enforcing mutual TLS with certificate pinning for the OnGuard agent's data/update channel, restricting agent communication to trusted internal servers via network segmentation and firewall rules, disabling automatic updates from untrusted sources, monitoring for rogue DHCP/DNS or ARP spoofing, and implementing endpoint detection and response (EDR) to detect anomalous code execution with elevated privileges.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 57% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely-used enterprise NAC, but OnGuard agent on a vendor-specific subset
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

More in Hpe

View all
CVE-2017-5689 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 02

An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Mana

CVE-2016-7434 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 13

The read_mru_list function in NTP before 4.2.8p9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a craf

CVE-2026-76708 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Default, hard-coded credentials shipped on several administrative and system accounts in HPE's Analytics and Location En

CVE-2024-53676 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 27

A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution

CVE-2022-37932 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 12

A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820, 1850, and 1920S

CVE-2020-7136 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 30

A security vulnerability in HPE Smart Update Manager (SUM) prior to version 8.5.6 could allow remote unauthorized access

CVE-2025-37097 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 01

A vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) prior to v7.15.0.646 may allow an unauthenticated denial of service

CVE-2019-8936 HIGH POC
7.5 May 15

NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2017-6458 HIGH
8.8 Mar 27

Multiple buffer overflows in the ctl_put* functions in NTP before 4.2.8p10 and 4.3.x before 4.3.94 allow remote authenti

CVE-2026-23600 CRITICAL
10.0 Mar 02

Remote authentication bypass in HPE AutoPass License Server (APLS) allows unauthenticated network attackers to circumven

CVE-2026-76674 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 15

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways running firmware in the 9.4.x,

CVE-2026-76670 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 15

Privilege escalation in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator (builds 9.4.0 through 9.4.10, 9.5.0 through 9.5.8

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy