Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttacker sends oversized upload to proxy endpoint
-
DeliveryApplication forwards data as stream via axios with httpVersion: 2
-
ExploitHTTP/2 adapter skips byte-counting wrapper due to maxRedirects gate
-
ExecutionFull stream piped unchecked to upstream service
-
ImpactUpstream bandwidth, storage, or API quota exhausted
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires all five conditions to be simultaneously true: (1) the axios call uses the Node.js HTTP adapter, not a browser (XHR/fetch) adapter; (2) the request is configured with the explicit option httpVersion: 2; (3) the request body is supplied as a Node.js Readable stream - String, Buffer, and ArrayBuffer bodies are pre-checked before transport selection and are not exploitable; (4) a finite positive numeric value is set for maxBodyLength - applications using the default maxBodyLength: -1 (unlimited) do not cross any configured boundary and are explicitly unaffected; and (5) the attacker controls or meaningfully influences the content length or volume of the stream passed to axios, typically by being the source of an upload forwarded by a proxy. Exploitation is further bounded by impact: only resource consumption and policy bypass are achievable. For axios >=1.15.1, adding maxRedirects: 0 to the affected call removes the bypass even before upgrading. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L) accurately captures the key characteristics: no confidentiality or integrity impact, limited availability impact only, and attack requirements present (AT:P) reflecting the specific configuration prerequisites required. No EPSS data was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The CVE is not in CISA KEV and no public proof-of-concept exploit code was identified in the available intelligence. Real-world priority is low-to-medium: the vulnerability is actionable only for upload-proxy architectures that deliberately configure a finite maxBodyLength as a hard enforcement boundary over HTTP/2 with streamed bodies - deployments using the default maxBodyLength: -1 (unlimited) or non-streaming bodies are entirely outside the attack surface. A significant data quality issue must be flagged: the intelligence tags include 'RCE', which directly contradicts the advisory's explicit statement that the vulnerability does not enable code execution, credential disclosure, or request-destination control - that tag is erroneous and should be disregarded when triaging. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker uploads an arbitrarily large file to a web application that proxies user uploads to an upstream storage or processing API over HTTP/2 using axios, with a finite maxBodyLength set to enforce a per-upload size cap. Because the HTTP/2 adapter bypasses the byte-counting wrapper, the full stream is forwarded to the upstream service regardless of size, consuming bandwidth, storage quota, or API rate limits far beyond the operator's intended policy. No public proof-of-concept exploit code has been identified; the GHSA advisory documents local verification transmitting 2 MB against a 1 KB maxBodyLength limit on the v1.x codebase. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 01, 2026
HTTP/2 streamed upload requests in axios 1.13.0-1.17.x bypass the configured maxBodyLength limit, allowing applications that proxy attacker-controlled streams to an upstream HTTP/2 service to transmit outbound data of arbitrary size. The flaw is constrained to upload-forwarding architectures that explicitly configure a finite maxBodyLength, use the Node.js HTTP adapter with httpVersion: 2, and accept streamed request bodies - conditions common in reverse-proxy and file-upload relay patterns. Impact is limited to resource exhaustion and policy bypass (excess egress costs, upstream quota consumption, limited availability); no public exploit has been identified and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Upgrade axios to version 1.18.0, which contains the upstream fix via commit 32fc489632377d214db55bfa4e2c48486a7d7ce2 (PR #11000 at https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/11000). For applications running axios >=1.15.1 that cannot immediately upgrade, setting maxRedirects: 0 explicitly on affected HTTP/2 upload calls activates the existing stream byte-counting wrapper and will reject streams that exceed maxBodyLength - note that this disables redirect following for those specific call sites, which is typically acceptable for proxy-to-upstream flows where redirects are not expected but should be verified per application. Applications relying on the default maxBodyLength: -1 or that use string, Buffer, or ArrayBuffer bodies do not require any action. The vendor advisory at https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-mwf2-3pr3-8698 should be consulted for authoritative guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in npm
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
axios is a promise-based HTTP client for Node.js and browsers, distributed via npm (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*). In its Node.js adapter (lib/adapters/http.js), when the request option httpVersion resolves to '2', axios routes through Node's native http2Transport rather than the follow-redirects-backed HTTP/1.1 path. The root cause (CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) is a logic gap between transport selection and enforcement: axios writes config.maxBodyLength to the options object, but Node's HTTP/2 request API silently ignores that field. The stream-level byte-counting wrapper that would otherwise enforce the limit is conditioned on config.maxBodyLength > -1 && config.maxRedirects === 0; because HTTP/2 calls bypass follow-redirects and default maxRedirects is non-zero, this wrapper is never entered, and uploadStream.pipe(req) forwards the full stream to the upstream service uncapped. String, Buffer, and ArrayBuffer bodies are pre-validated before transport selection and remain unaffected. The affected npm package range is >=1.13.0 <1.18.0.
Know when Axios gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
AC:H reflects the specific conjunction of HTTP/2 transport, stream body type, finite maxBodyLength, and attacker-controlled stream required; no confidentiality or integrity impact applies.
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
axios versions >=1.13.0 (Node.js HTTP adapter) fail to enforce the configured maxBodyLength limit on streamed request bodies when requests are sent with httpVersion: 2. Because Node's HTTP/2 request API does not honor the maxBodyLength option and axios's byte-counting stream wrapper is gated on maxRedirects === 0, an attacker who controls a stream passed to axios can cause the application to transmit outbound data exceeding the configured finite maxBodyLength. Impact is limited to resource consumption and policy bypass (excess egress, upstream quota consumption, limited availability); it does not enable code execution, credential disclosure, or request-destination control. Calls using the default maxBodyLength: -1 and browser adapters are not affected.
Blast Radius
ecosystem impact- 25 npm packages depend on axios (15 direct, 10 indirect)
Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 1.13.0.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
NO_PROXY protection bypass in Axios HTTP client (versions 1.0.0-1.15.0 and ≤0.31.0) lets an attacker who controls a requ
JSON response tampering in the Axios HTTP client (versions 1.0.0 up to but not including 1.15.2) lets an attacker who ca
Prototype pollution via the Node.js HTTP adapter in axios allows an attacker who controls `Object.prototype.proxy` to si
axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.7), this vulnerability is
Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is
Axios versions up to 0.30.3 is affected by improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions (CVSS 7.5).
axios 1.7.2 allows SSRF via unexpected behavior where requests for path relative URLs get processed as protocol relative
axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is
Axios up to and including 0.18.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by continuing to acce
Prototype pollution in Axios HTTP client versions before 1.15.1 and 0.31.1 enables silent interception and modification
Denial of service in Axios HTTP client before versions 1.15.1 and 0.31.1 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to cras
Prototype pollution in Axios library versions prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1 allows remote attackers to suppress HTTP error
Same weakness CWE-400 – Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-51826
GHSA-fqj3-h9pc-443h
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB