Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver malicious app to device
-
DeliveryUser installs and runs app
-
ExploitExploit logic/validation flaw (CWE-693)
-
ExecutionBypass data-access protection
-
ImpactRead sensitive user data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a malicious or compromised app to be installed and executed on the target Apple device (AV:L, UI:R) - there is no remote or network-based vector. The app leverages a validation/logic flaw to escape its sandbox data-access boundary and reach sensitive user data. Limiting factors: the attacker must first get a hostile app onto the device (App Store review, enterprise provisioning, or sideloading) and the user must run it; impact is confidentiality-only (no data modification or denial of service); and the device must be running an unpatched OS version below the fixed builds (iOS/iPadOS <26.7 or <27, macOS <15.8/<26.7/<27, tvOS <27, visionOS <27). |
| Impact | This is a moderate, genuinely-scored issue rather than an urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N = 5.5) makes the real constraint clear: exploitation is LOCAL - it requires a malicious or compromised app already running on the device, not a remote network attacker. Impact is confidentiality-only (C:H, I:N, A:N): a sandboxed app bypasses Apple's access controls (CWE-693, Protection Mechanism Failure) to read sensitive user data it should not reach. All exploitation signals point to low real-world urgency: EPSS is 0.18% (7th percentile - very low predicted exploitation), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code is identified. No signals conflict: the low EPSS, absent KEV, and modest CVSS are mutually consistent. One nuance worth flagging for verification: the vector lists PR:N (no privileges) together with AV:L and UI:R, which is Apple's common modeling for a 'malicious app' installed and run by the user - so 'unauthenticated' in the CVSS sense does not mean 'remote and trivial.' The practical gate is getting a hostile app onto the device (e.g., via the App Store review process or sideloading), which materially limits attacker reach. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker publishes or delivers a malicious app that, once installed and launched by the victim, abuses the logic flaw to escape its intended data-access boundary and read sensitive user data (e.g., data belonging to other apps or the system). No public proof-of-concept or active exploitation is known; the attack is entirely local and depends on the user first running the malicious app. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Sensitive user data can be read by a malicious or compromised app on unpatched Apple devices because a logic-validation flaw lets the app cross its data-access boundary. Affected platforms are iOS and iPadOS before 26.7 and before 27, macOS before Sequoia 15.8, before Tahoe 26.7 and before Golden Gate 27, tvOS before 27, and visionOS before 27; the assessed vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/C:H/I:N/A:N) shows the attacker must first get a hostile app onto the device and the user must run it, with confidentiality-only impact. Vendor patches are available for every platform, EPSS rates exploitation probability at roughly 0.18% (7th percentile), and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, and visionOS 27 - update each managed device to at least these builds, prioritizing iPhones/iPads and Macs that users routinely install third-party or sideloaded applications on. Apply updates through normal Apple channels (Settings > General > Software Update on iOS/iPadOS/tvOS/visionOS; System Settings > General > Software Update on macOS) or via MDM/DDM declarative device management if you manage fleets, and verify the installed build string after updating since Apple patches are cumulative and older minor branches receive the fix only in their own release line. No vendor workaround is documented for this logic-validation flaw; because exploitation requires the attacker to get a hostile app running locally (AV:L, UI:R, PR:N), the practical compensating controls while patching are MDM-enforced App Store-only install policies and blocking of sideloading/enterprise-sideloaded builds (trade-off: breaks legitimate internal app distribution and beta testing), tighter app-permission and privacy review for data-heavy apps (trade-off: operational overhead and reduced user capability), and network/EDR monitoring for unusual inter-app data access - none of which fully substitutes for the patched OS. Details and per-platform advisory URLs are available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/149034, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149036, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149038, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149041, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042 and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149043, with an aggregator entry at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-65406.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 4 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is classified as CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure): Apple's advisory states a logic issue was addressed with improved validation, meaning an OS-level access-control or sandbox boundary that normally prevents one app from reaching another app's or the system's protected data could be bypassed by malformed or unexpected input that the validation routine did not anticipate. CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:apple:ios_and_ipados, cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos, cpe:2.3:a:apple:tvos, cpe:2.3:a:apple:visionos) confirms the flaw exists in the shared Apple operating-system codebase rather than a single app, which is why fixes shipped simultaneously across all four platform families. Because the vector is local with user interaction and no privileges required (PR:N), the exposure model is a normal user-installed application abusing a validation gap to read data it should not be able to see, rather than a remote or pre-authentication network attack; there is no integrity, availability, or scope-change component in the assessed impact.
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local malicious-app vector (AV:L), no privileges needed but user must run the app (PR:N/UI:R); confidentiality-only data exposure (C:H, I:N, A:N), matching Apple's model.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, tvOS 27, visionOS 27. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-77972
GHSA-qmp5-w9cr-8vfv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB